Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slotnick, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brosvic, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Slotnick, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brosvic, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chemical Senses 12: 333-339,
© 1987


research-article

Failure of rats to acquire a taste reversal learning set

Burton M. Slotnick and Gary M. Brosvic1

Department of Psychology, The American University Washington, DC 20016, USA 1Present address: Department of Psychology, Glassboro State College, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA

Rats were trained using operant conditioning to discriminate either 0.9% NaCl from 0.1% saccharin or 0.75% NaCl from 1% sucrose and were tested on a series of seven successive discrimination reversal problems. Most animals made many more errors on the first reversal than on original learning (negative transfer) and none demonstrated acquisition of a reversal learning set. These results, together with those of prior studies in this laboratory, indicate that on reversal learning tasks the performance of rats trained with taste cues is inferior to those trained with odors and is quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those trained with visual or auditory cues. These results are in marked contrast to those obtained in respondent conditioning of aversions where taste cues are much more effective than olfactory, visual or auditory cues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.