Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harder, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Whitney, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harder, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Whitney, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chemical Senses 14: 547-564,
© 1989


research-article

Assessing gustatory detection capabilities using preference procedures

David B. Harder, John C. Maggio and Glayde Whitney

Department of Psychology, Florida State University Tallahassee, FL 32306-1051, USA

Two-bottle preference tests have often been used to make inferences about gustatory thresholds. The validity of such inferences depends on the extent to which taste differences produce differential fluid consumptions from the bottles. If equal amounts are consumed despite perceived gustatory dissimilarity, inaccurate threshold estimates result. Modifications of common preference-test procedures, interacting with tastant properties and genetic variation, disclosed instances of such non-discrimination among inbred strains of mice. With an hedonically neutral to mildly unpalatable tastant (sodium cyclamate), taste-aversion conditioning yielded lower thresholds. With a palatable tastant (maltose), testing without prior conditioning usually indicated lower thresholds. Descending concentration series produced lower thresholds than ascending concentration series, for both palatable (sucrose) and neutral (cyclamate) tastants. Previous experience with the tastants elevated preference scores, yielding lower thresholds with palatable tastants (sucrose, maltose) and higher thresholds with an unpalatable tastant (sucrose octaacetate). Within-strain discrepancies between thresholds indicated by the different methods were often large (2–3 log molar concentration steps). Amongstrain differences of comparable magnitude, both in preferences and threshold estimates, were found for sucrose, maltose and cyclamate.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S. J. St. John and J. D. Boughter Jr
Orosensory Responsiveness to and Preference for Hydroxide-Containing Salts in Mice
Chem Senses, July 1, 2009; 34(6): 487 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
Y. Ishiwatari and A. A. Bachmanov
A High-Throughput Method to Measure NaCl and Acid Taste Thresholds in Mice
Chem Senses, May 1, 2009; 34(4): 277 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. L. Youngentob and J. I. Glendinning
From the Cover: Fetal ethanol exposure increases ethanol intake by making it smell and taste better
PNAS, March 31, 2009; 106(13): 5359 - 5364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
J. I. Glendinning
How Do Predators Cope With Chemically Defended Foods?
Biol. Bull., December 1, 2007; 213(3): 252 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
B. K. Smith, J. Volaufova, and D. B. West
Increased flavor preference and lick activity for sucrose and corn oil in SWR/J vs. AKR/J mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): R596 - R606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. I. Glendinning, H. Brown, M. Capoor, A. Davis, A. Gbedemah, and E. Long
A Peripheral Mechanism for Behavioral Adaptation to Specific "Bitter" Taste Stimuli in an Insect
J. Neurosci., May 15, 2001; 21(10): 3688 - 3696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Ming, Y. Ninomiya, and R. F. Margolskee
Blocking taste receptor activation of gustducin inhibits gustatory responses to bitter compounds
PNAS, August 17, 1999; 96(17): 9903 - 9908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Glendinning, S Ensslen, M. Eisenberg, and P Weiskopf
Diet-induced plasticity in the taste system of an insect: localization to a single transduction pathway in an identified taste cell
J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 1999; 202(15): 2091 - 2102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
G.T. Wong, L. Ruiz-Avila, D. Ming, K.S. Gannon, and R.F. Margolskee
Biochemical and Transgenic Analysis of Gustducin's Role in Bitter and Sweet Transduction
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 1996; 61(0): 173 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.