Chemical Senses 22: 287-293,
© 1997
research-article |
Broad Tuning of Rat Taste Cells for Four Basic Taste Stimuli
Department of Physiology, Nagasaki University School of Dentistry 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852, Japan 1Department of Biological Science, Florida State University Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Toshihide Sato, Department of Physiology, Nagasaki University School of Dentistry, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852, Japan
The breadth of responsiveness of rat taste cells to the four basic taste stimuli was studied using the entropy measure (H) proposed by Smith and Travers. H values range from 0.0 for narrow tuning to 1.0 for broad tuning. Based on the responses of depolarizing receptor potentials of 26 rat taste cells to the four basic taste stimuli, taste cells were classified into nine NaCl-best, four Q-HCI (quinine-HCI)-best, 10 HCL-best and three sucrose-best cells. NaCl-best cells were narrowly tuned to the four basic taste stimuli, but the other three stimuli-best cells were broadly tuned to the stimuli. In all, 85% of the taste cells responded to more than one of four basic taste stimuli. The mean H values for NaCl-best, Q-HCI-best, HCI-best and sucrose-best cells were 0.285, 0.832, 0.781 and 0.796 respectively. The mean H value for all 26 taste cells was 0.621. This was larger than H in rat gustatory fibers. Transformation of large H values in taste cells into small H values in taste fibers may be due to a non-random interaction between taste cells and taste fibers during the synaptic formation. Broad tuning properties of rat taste cells suggest that the across-taste cell response pattern may play an important role in taste quality coding mechanisms. Chem. Senses 22: 287–293, 1997.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. I. Glendinning How Do Predators Cope With Chemically Defended Foods? Biol. Bull., December 1, 2007; 213(3): 252 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Breza, K. S. Curtis, and R. J. Contreras Monosodium Glutamate but not Linoleic Acid Differentially Activates Gustatory Neurons in the Rat Geniculate Ganglion Chem Senses, November 1, 2007; 32(9): 833 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Tomchik, S. Berg, J. W. Kim, N. Chaudhari, and S. D. Roper Breadth of Tuning and Taste Coding in Mammalian Taste Buds J. Neurosci., October 3, 2007; 27(40): 10840 - 10848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Yoshida, N. Shigemura, K. Sanematsu, K. Yasumatsu, S. Ishizuka, and Y. Ninomiya Taste Responsiveness of Fungiform Taste Cells With Action Potentials J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3088 - 3095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. H. Lemon and D. V. Smith Neural Representation of Bitter Taste in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3719 - 3729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. C. Spector and S. P. Travers The representation of taste quality in the Mammalian nervous system. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, September 1, 2005; 4(3): 143 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Caicedo, K.-N. Kim, and S. D Roper Individual mouse taste cells respond to multiple chemical stimuli J. Physiol., October 15, 2002; 544(2): 501 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Rogers and P. L. Newland Gustatory Processing in Thoracic Local Circuits of Locusts J. Neurosci., September 15, 2002; 22(18): 8324 - 8333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Gilbertson, J. D. Boughter Jr, H. Zhang, and D. V. Smith Distribution of Gustatory Sensitivities in Rat Taste Cells: Whole-Cell Responses to Apical Chemical Stimulation J. Neurosci., July 1, 2001; 21(13): 4931 - 4941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Varkevisser, D. Peterson, T. Ogura, and S. C. Kinnamon Neural Networks Distinguish between Taste Qualities Based on Receptor Cell Population Responses Chem Senses, June 1, 2001; 26(5): 499 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|