| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chemical Senses 23: 371-378,
© 1998 Oxford University Press
The Influence of Acid on Astringency of Alum and Phenolic Compounds
Hebrew University Jerusalem, Israel 2 Chateau Morrisette Meadows of Dan, VA 24120 USA 3 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, CA 95616, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: A.C. Noble, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. e-mail: acnoble{at}ucdavis.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
Astringency of aqueous solutions of phenolic compounds (grape seed tannins, tannic acid, catechin and gallic acid) increased upon addition of citric acid, whereas the astringency of alum was reduced. Astringency of alum was decreased equivalently by addition of equi-sour levels of lactic acid, citric acid or hydrochloric acid. The difference between alum and the phenolic compounds is speculated to result from chemical modifications affecting binding of the astringents with oral proteins rather than cognitive differences. Chelation of the aluminum ion in alum by acids reduces its availability for interacting with salivary proteins or epithelial proteins. In contrast, the increased astringency produced upon acidification of phenolic compounds is speculated to result from the pH driven increase in the affinity of the phenols for binding with proteins. These results suggest that alum cannot be used interchangeably with phenolic astringents in psychophysical studies.
1 Present address: Box 690, Magdiel, Hod Hasharon, Israel
Accepted 22 December 1997
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W. Beecher, M. A. Drake, P. J. Luck, and E. A. Foegeding Factors Regulating Astringency of Whey Protein Beverages J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2553 - 2560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Landon, K. Weller, J. F. Harbertson, and C. F. Ross Chemical and Sensory Evaluation of Astringency in Washington State Red Wines Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2008; 59(2): 153 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Cortell, H. K. Sivertsen, J. A. Kennedy, and H. Heymann Influence of Vine Vigor on Pinot noir Fruit Composition, Wine Chemical Analysis, and Wine Sensory Attributes Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2008; 59(1): 1 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Lesschaeve and A. C Noble Polyphenols: factors influencing their sensory properties and their effects on food and beverage preferences Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 330S - 335S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Cerf-Ducastel, P.-F. Van de Moortele, P. MacLeod, D. Le Bihan, and A. Faurion Interaction of Gustatory and Lingual Somatosensory Perceptions at the Cortical Level in the Human: a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Chem Senses, May 1, 2001; 26(4): 371 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



