Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaissling, K.-E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kaissling, K.-E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chemical Senses 23: 385-395,
© 1998 Oxford University Press

Pheromone Deactivation Catalyzed by Receptor Molecules: a Quantitative Kinetic Model

Karl-Ernst Kaissling

Max-Planck-Institut für Verhaltensphysiologie Seewiesen 82319 Starnberg, Germany

Correspondence to be sent to: Dr Karl-Ernst Kaissling, api. Prof., Max-Planck-Institut für Verhaltensphysiologie Seewiesen, Postfach 1564, D-82305 Starnberg, Germany e-mail: kaissling{at}mpi-seewiesen.mpg.de


   Abstract

A quantitative model of pheromone-receptor interaction and pheromone deactivation, the supposed rate-limiting processes underlying the receptor potential kinetics, is worked out for the moth Antheraea poiyphemus. In this model, the pheromone interacts with the receptor molecule while bound to the reduced form of the pheromone binding protein. The receptor molecules—besides their receptor function—catalyze the observed shift of the pheromone-binding protein from the reduced to the oxidized form (Ziegelberger, G., Eur. J. Biochem., 232, 706–711, 1995), which deactivates the pheromone bound to pheromone binding protein. With the following parameters, the model fits morphological, radiometric, electrophysiological and biochemical data: a maximum estimate of 1.7 x 107 receptor molecules/cell (with 40 000 units/µm2 of receptor cell membrane), rate constants k1 = 0.2/(s. µM) for the association, k2 = 10/s for the dissociation of the ternary complex of binding protein, pheromone and receptor, and k3 10/s for the deactivation via the redox shift. With these parameters, the duration of elementary receptor potentials elicited by single pheromone molecules (~50 ms) reflects the lifetime of the ternary complex, {tau} {approx} 1/(k2 + k3). The receptor occupancy produced by the model for threshold stimuli fits the sensitivity of the receptor cell to single pheromone molecules.

Accepted 17 March 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S. Zhang, Y.-J. Zhang, H.-H. Su, X.-W. Gao, and Y.-Y. Guo
Identification and Expression Pattern of Putative Odorant-Binding Proteins and Chemosensory Proteins in Antennae of the Microplitis mediator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
Chem Senses, July 1, 2009; 34(6): 503 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
K. Tsuchihara, K. Fujikawa, M. Ishiguro, T. Yamada, C. Tada, K. Ozaki, and M. Ozaki
An Odorant-binding Protein Facilitates Odorant Transfer from Air to Hydrophilic Surroundings in the Blowfly
Chem Senses, September 1, 2005; 30(7): 559 - 564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
B. Pophof
Pheromone-binding Proteins Contribute to the Activation of Olfactory Receptor Neurons in the Silkmoths Antheraea polyphemus and Bombyx mori
Chem Senses, February 1, 2004; 29(2): 117 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J.-P. Rospars, P. Lansky, and V. Krivan
Extracellular Transduction Events Under Pulsed Stimulation in Moth Olfactory Sensilla
Chem Senses, July 1, 2003; 28(6): 509 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. Ozaki, T. Takahara, Y. Kawahara, A. Wada-Katsumata, K. Seno, T. Amakawa, R. Yamaoka, and T. Nakamura
Perception of Noxious Compounds by Contact Chemoreceptors of the Blowfly, Phormia regina: Putative Role of an Odorant-binding Protein
Chem Senses, May 1, 2003; 28(4): 349 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E. Jacquin-Joly, R. G. Vogt, M.-C. Francois, and P. Nagnan-Le Meillour
Functional and Expression Pattern Analysis of Chemosensory Proteins Expressed in Antennae and Pheromonal Gland of Mamestra brassicae
Chem Senses, September 1, 2001; 26(7): 833 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S.-g. Zhang, R. Maida, and R. A. Steinbrecht
Immunolocalization of Odorant-binding Proteins in Noctuid Moths (Insecta, Lepidoptera)
Chem Senses, September 1, 2001; 26(7): 885 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J.-P. Rospars, V. Krivan, and P. Lansky
Perireceptor and Receptor Events in Olfaction. Comparison of Concentration and Flux Detectors: a Modeling Study
Chem Senses, June 1, 2000; 25(3): 293 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Wojtasek and W. S. Leal
Conformational Change in the Pheromone-binding Protein from Bombyx mori Induced by pH and by Interaction with Membranes
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 1999; 274(43): 30950 - 30956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
R.G. Vogt, F.E. Callahan, M.E. Rogers, and J.C. Dickens
Odorant Binding Protein Diversity and Distribution among the Insect Orders, as Indicated by LAP, an OBP-related Protein of the True Bug Lygus lineolaris (Hemiptera, Heteroptera)
Chem Senses, October 1, 1999; 24(5): 481 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
W. M. Getz
A Kinetic Model of the Transient Phase in the Response of Olfactory Receptor Neurons
Chem Senses, October 1, 1999; 24(5): 497 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Rogers, M. Jani, and R. Vogt
An olfactory-specific glutathione-S-transferase in the sphinx moth Manduca sexta
J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 1999; 202(12): 1625 - 1637.
[Abstract]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.