Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by White, T. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chemical Senses 23: 433-441,
© 1998 Oxford University Press

Olfactory Memory: the Long and Short of It

Theresa L. White

SUNY Health Science Center at Syracuse Syracuse, NY, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Theresa L. White, SUNY Health Science Center Room 3232 Weiskotten Hall, 766 living Avenue, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. e-mail whitet{at}vax.cs.hscsyredu


   Abstract

It has been proposed that memory for odors does not have a short-term (or working) memory system. The distinction between short- and long-term memory in other sensory modalities has been generally supported by three main lines of evidence: capacity differences between the proposed systems, evidence of differential coding, and differential memory losses in neuropsychological patients. The present paper examines these issues in an effort to establish a similar distinction for the memory of olfactory stimuli. Each of these lines of evidence is examined in relation to the literature on olfactory memory. Based on this examination, it seems that there is at least preliminary support from each of these lines of evidence to advocate a distinction between a long- and short-term memory for olfactory stimuli. Emphasis is placed upon the qualitative similarity of olfactory memory to other memory systems. This similarity is further highlighted through an examination of the literature pertinent to serial position effects in memory for olfactory stimuli.

Accepted 9 March 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
B. C. Sun and B. P. Halpern
Identification of Air Phase Retronasal and Orthonasal Odorant Pairs
Chem Senses, October 1, 2005; 30(8): 693 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E.P. Koster
Does Olfactory Memory Depend on Remembering Odors?
Chem Senses, January 1, 2005; 30(suppl_1): i236 - i237.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. N. Lundstrom, T. Hummel, and M. J. Olsson
Individual Differences in Sensitivity to the Odor of 4,16-Androstadien-3-one
Chem Senses, September 1, 2003; 28(7): 643 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E. P. Koster, J. Degel, and D. Piper
Proactive and Retroactive Interference in Implicit Odor Memory
Chem Senses, March 1, 2002; 27(3): 191 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S. Chu and J. J. Downes
Odour-evoked Autobiographical Memories: Psychological Investigations of Proustian Phenomena
Chem Senses, February 1, 2000; 25(1): 111 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.