Chemical Senses 23: 453-457,
© 1998 Oxford University Press
Bilateral Detection Thresholds in Dextrals and Sinistrals Reflect the More Sensitive Side of the Nose, Which Is Not Lateralized
Smell and Taste Center and Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Dr R.L. Doty Smell and Taste Centei University of Pennsylvania Medical Centec 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Several fundamental questions remain enigmatic concerning human olfactory sensitivity, including (i) whether detection threshold differences exist between the two sides of the nose (and, if so, whether such differences are influenced by handedness) and (ii) whether bilateral (i.e. binasal) stimulation leads to lower thresholds than unilateral stimulation (and, if so, whether the degree of facilitation is inversely related to general olfactory ability). In this study, a reliable and well-validated single staircase procedure was used to establish bilateral and unilateral detection thresholds for the cranial nerve I stimulant phenyl ethyl alcohol in 130 right- and 33 left-handed subjects. No differences in sensitivity between the left and right sides of the nose were observed in either group. Bilateral thresholds were lower, on average, than unilateral thresholds when the latter were categorized in terms of left and right nares. However, the bilateral thresholds did not differ significantly from those of the side of the nose with the lower threshold. Overall smell ability, as measured by the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, did not interact with any of the test measures. These data imply that (i) the left and right sides of the nose do not systematically differ in detection threshold sensitivity for either dextrals or sinistrals and (ii) if central integration of left:right olfactory threshold sensitivity occurs, its effects do not exceed the function of the better side of the nose.
Accepted 19 April 1998
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Frasnelli, G. Charbonneau, O. Collignon, and F. Lepore Odor Localization and Sniffing Chem Senses, February 1, 2009; 34(2): 139 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Haehner, A. Rodewald, J. C. Gerber, and T. Hummel Correlation of Olfactory Function With Changes in the Volume of the Human Olfactory Bulb Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, June 1, 2008; 134(6): 621 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. A. Tourbier and R. L. Doty Sniff Magnitude Test: Relationship to Odor Identification, Detection, and Memory Tests in a Clinic Population Chem Senses, July 1, 2007; 32(6): 515 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. S. Choudhury, P. Moberg, and R. L. Doty Influences of Age and Sex on a Microencapsulated Odor Memory Test Chem Senses, November 1, 2003; 28(9): 799 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Broman, M. J. Olsson, and S. Nordin Lateralization of Olfactory Cognitive Functions: Effects of Rhinal Side of Stimulation Chem Senses, November 1, 2001; 26(9): 1187 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A Welge-Luessen, A Temmel, C Quint, B Moll, S Wolf, and T Hummel Olfactory function in patients with olfactory groove meningioma J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2001; 70(2): 218 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Olsson and M. Friden Evidence of Odor Priming: Edibility Judgements are Primed Differently between the Hemispheres Chem Senses, February 1, 2001; 26(2): 117 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Sobel, R. M. Khan, C. A. Hartley, E. V. Sullivan, and J. D.E. Gabrieli Sniffing Longer rather than Stronger to Maintain Olfactory Detection Threshold Chem Senses, February 1, 2000; 25(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|