Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Otero-Losada, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Otero-Losada, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 24: 245-253, 1999
© Oxford University Press

A Kinetic Study on Benzoic Acid Pungency and Sensory Attributes of Benzoic Acid

Matilde E. Otero-Losada

Laboratorio de Investigaciones Sensoriales (LIS)-CONICET, M. T. de Alvear 2202 4° P°, CP 1122, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Correspondence to be sent to: M.E. Otero-Losada, Laboratorio de Investigaciones Sensoriales (LIS)-CONICET, M. T. de Alvear 2202 4° P°, CP 1122, Buenos Aires, Argentina. e-mail: mol{at}fibertel.com.ar

Aqueous solutions of benzoic acid (BA) were evaluated by two methods: (i) sensory profile: a descriptive test of sensory attributes combined with semiquantitative analysis; and (ii) pungency intensity measures as a function of time: a computerized recording using specific software. Kinetic parameters evaluated were maximal intensity (IMAX), total time of pungency (Ttot), rates of increase (V1) and decrease (V2), half-life (T½), area under curve (AUC) and time to maximal intensity (TIMAX). Results were analyzed by ANOVA, LSD test, iterative calculations and adjustment to equations according to mathematical models, regression analysis, principal component analysis (PCA) and clusters analysis. Pungency was the main sensory attribute of BA (3–36 mM) in the tongue and epiglottis. The seven kinetic parameters showed concentration-dependency (P < 0.001) and were described by different functions: (i) lineal: IMAX = 2.24 ± 0.14C 3.06 ± 2.58, R2 = 0.98; TIMAX = 0.19 ± 0.02C + 6.87 ± 0.47, R2 = 0.92; V1 = 0.68 ± 0.03C + 0.10 ± 0.69, R2 = 0.99; AUC = 49.10 ± 3.17C 230.78 ± 59.66, R2 = 0.98; (ii) potency: T½ = 6.62 ± 0.61C0.39±0.03, R2 = 0.97; V2 = 1.07 ± 0.11C0.53±0.04, R2 = 0.98; Ttot = 8.08 ± 1.01C0.43±0.04, R2 = 0.96. PCA revealed high correlation between (i) TIMAX and Ttot; (ii) T½ and V2; and (iii) IMAX and V1. Stimuli grouped across three main clusters: (i) 3 and 6 mM; (ii) 9, 12 and 18 mM; and (iii) 24 and 36 mM. Maximal pungency intensity best correlated with both concentration and persistence among kinetic parameters. Prototypical prickling of BA was observed at 12 and 18 mM.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.