Chem. Senses 24: 263-270,
1999
© Oxford University Press
Olfactory Discrimination Ability for Homologous Series of Aliphatic Alcohols and Aldehydes
Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Goethestraße 31, D-80336 München, Germany
Correspondence to be sent to: Matthias Laska, Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Goethestraße 31, D-80336 München, Germany. e-mail:laska{at}imp.med.uni-muenchen.de
We tested the ability of human subjects to distinguish between members of homologous series of aliphatic alcohols (ethanol to n-octanol) and aldehydes (n-butanal to n-decanal). In a forced-choice triangular test procedure 20 subjects per series were repeatedly presented with all 21 binary combinations of the seven stimuli and asked to identify the bottle containing the odd stimulus. We found (i) that as a group, the subjects performed significantly above chance level in all tasks but two with the alcohols and all tasks but four with the aldehydes, and thus were clearly able to discriminate between most of the odor pairs presented; (ii) marked interindividual differences in discrimination performance, ranging from subjects who were able to significantly distinguish between all 21 odor pairs of a series to subjects who failed to do so with the majority of tasks; and (iii) a significant negative correlation between discrimination performance and structural similarity of odorants in terms of differences in carbon chain length for both homologous series. This suggests that carbon chain length may be one of presumably several determinants of the interaction between stimulus molecule and receptor, and thus may be a molecular property affecting odor quality of aliphatic alcohols and aldehydes.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. C. Daly, L. A. Carrell, and E. Mwilaria Characterizing Psychophysical Measures of Discrimination Thresholds and the Effects of Concentration on Discrimination Learning in the Moth Manduca sexta Chem Senses, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 95 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Khan, C.-H. Luk, A. Flinker, A. Aggarwal, H. Lapid, R. Haddad, and N. Sobel Predicting Odor Pleasantness from Odorant Structure: Pleasantness as a Reflection of the Physical World J. Neurosci., September 12, 2007; 27(37): 10015 - 10023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Wise, T. Miyazawa, M. Gallagher, and G. Preti Human Odor Detection of Homologous Carboxylic Acids and Their Binary Mixtures Chem Senses, June 1, 2007; 32(5): 475 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Laska Olfactory Discrimination Ability for Aliphatic C6 Alcohols as a Function of Presence, Position, and Configuration of a Double Bond Chem Senses, November 1, 2005; 30(9): 755 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Wright and B. H. Smith Different Thresholds for Detection and Discrimination of Odors in the Honey bee (Apis mellifera) Chem Senses, February 1, 2004; 29(2): 127 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Laska Olfactory Discrimination Ability of Human Subjects for Enantiomers with an Isopropenyl Group at the Chiral Center Chem Senses, February 1, 2004; 29(2): 143 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Xu, N. Liu, I. Kida, D. L. Rothman, F. Hyder, and G. M. Shepherd Odor maps of aldehydes and esters revealed by functional MRI in the glomerular layer of the mouse olfactory bulb PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 11029 - 11034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Laska and N. Grimm SURE, Why Not? The SUbstitution-REciprocity Method for Measurement of Odor Quality Discrimination Thresholds: Replication and Extension to Nonhuman Primates Chem Senses, February 1, 2003; 28(2): 105 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Meiners, F. Wackers, and W. J. Lewis The Effect of Molecular Structure on Olfactory Discrimination by the Parasitoid Microplitis croceipes Chem Senses, November 1, 2002; 27(9): 811 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Laska Olfactory Discrimination Ability for Aromatic Odorants as a Function of Oxygen Moiety Chem Senses, January 1, 2002; 27(1): 23 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Linster, B. A. Johnson, E. Yue, A. Morse, Z. Xu, E. E. Hingco, Y. Choi, M. Choi, A. Messiha, and M. Leon Perceptual Correlates of Neural Representations Evoked by Odorant Enantiomers J. Neurosci., December 15, 2001; 21(24): 9837 - 9843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Laska Perception of Trigeminal Chemosensory Qualities in the Elderly Chem Senses, July 1, 2001; 26(6): 681 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Olsson and W. S. Cain Psychometrics of Odor Quality Discrimination: Method for Threshold Determination Chem Senses, October 1, 2000; 25(5): 493 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Wise, M. J. Olsson, and W. S. Cain Quantification of Odor Quality Chem Senses, August 1, 2000; 25(4): 429 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Laska, S. Ayabe-Kanamura, F. Hubener, and S. Saito Olfactory Discrimination Ability for Aliphatic Odorants as a Function of Oxygen Moiety Chem Senses, April 1, 2000; 25(2): 189 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kaluza and H Breer Responsiveness of olfactory neurons to distinct aliphatic aldehydes J. Exp. Biol., January 3, 2000; 203(5): 927 - 933. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Laska, C. G. Galizia, M. Giurfa, and R. Menzel Olfactory Discrimination Ability and Odor Structure–Activity Relationships in Honeybees Chem Senses, August 1, 1999; 24(4): 429 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



