Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Degel, J.
Right arrow Articles by Köster, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Degel, J.
Right arrow Articles by Köster, E. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 24: 317-325, 1999
© Oxford University Press

Odors: Implicit Memory and Performance Effects

Joachim Degel and Egon Peter Köster

Centre Européen Des Sciences Du Goût, Dijon, France

Correspondence to be sent to: Joachim Degel, Allmendring 12, D-75203 Königsbach, Germany

In order to assess the influence of odors on human performance and implicit memory for odors, 108 subjects completed a variety of tests in weakly scented (jasmine, lavender or odorless) rooms without having been made aware of the odor. After a 30 min interval the subjects were shown slides of different surroundings, including the room they had been in, and were requested to rate how well a set of 12 odors, including a blank, would fit to these surroundings. Half of these contexts contained visual cues related to two of the presented odors (leather and coffee). After the rating of fit the subjects had to rate the odors for pleasantness, were asked to identify the odors with their correct names and to tell where and when they had last smelled these odors. One subject remembered smelling the odor (jasmine) in the room and was discarded from the analysis of the results for the rating of fit. None of the others reported recollection of the experimental odors. The results showed that in general jasmine had a negative and lavender a positive effect on test performance. If an odor-related visual cue was present in the context, the related odor was always rated highest in fit to that context. Furthermore, the subjects working in rooms with an odor subsequently assigned this odor to the visual context of that room to a significantly higher degree than subjects working in rooms with different odors. Since none of the subjects reported that they had smelled the odor in the rooms where performance testing took place, it was concluded that the memory for these odors was implicit. Further analysis showed that such memory was only found in subjects who were unable to supply the right name for the odor. The possible consequences of this latter finding for understanding the relationship between sensory (episodic) and semantic odor memory are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
P. J. Bulsing, M. A.M. Smeets, and M. A. Van den Hout
The Implicit Association between Odors and Illness
Chem Senses, February 1, 2009; 34(2): 111 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
C. Chrea, D. Grandjean, S. Delplanque, I. Cayeux, B. Le Calve, L. Aymard, M. I. Velazco, D. Sander, and K. R. Scherer
Mapping the Semantic Space for the Subjective Experience of Emotional Responses to Odors
Chem Senses, January 1, 2009; 34(1): 49 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
D. E. Gaygen and A. Hedge
Effect of Acute Exposure to a Complex Fragrance on Lexical Decision Performance
Chem Senses, January 1, 2009; 34(1): 85 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. L. Dematte, D. Sanabria, R. Sugarman, and C. Spence
Cross-Modal Interactions Between Olfaction and Touch
Chem Senses, May 1, 2006; 31(4): 291 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
R. Sakamoto, K. Minoura, A. Usui, Y. Ishizuka, and S. Kanba
Effectiveness of Aroma on Work Efficiency: Lavender Aroma during Recesses Prevents Deterioration of Work Performance
Chem Senses, October 1, 2005; 30(8): 683 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
J. J. Gedney, T. L. Glover, and R. B. Fillingim
Sensory and Affective Pain Discrimination After Inhalation of Essential Oils
Psychosom Med, July 1, 2004; 66(4): 599 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
C. Holmes and C. Ballard
Aromatherapy in dementia
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., July 1, 2004; 10(4): 296 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M.A. Koster, J. Prescott, and E.P. Koster
Incidental Learning and Memory for Three Basic Tastes in Food
Chem Senses, June 1, 2004; 29(5): 441 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
B. Danuser, D. Moser, T. Vitale-Sethre, R. Hirsig, and H. Krueger
Performance in a Complex Task and Breathing under Odor Exposure
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, January 1, 2003; 45(4): 549 - 562.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
H. N.J. Schifferstein and S. T. Blok
The Signal Function of Thematically (In)congruent Ambient Scents in a Retail Environment
Chem Senses, July 1, 2002; 27(6): 539 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E. P. Koster, J. Degel, and D. Piper
Proactive and Retroactive Interference in Implicit Odor Memory
Chem Senses, March 1, 2002; 27(3): 191 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. Degel, D. Piper, and E. P. Koster
Implicit Learning and Implicit Memory for Odors: the Influence of Odor Identification and Retention Time
Chem Senses, April 1, 2001; 26(3): 267 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.