Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sobel, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gabrieli, J. D.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sobel, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gabrieli, J. D.E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 25: 1-8, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

Sniffing Longer rather than Stronger to Maintain Olfactory Detection Threshold

Noam Sobel1, Rehan M. Khan2, Catherine A. Hartley3, Edith V. Sullivan1,4 and John D.E. Gabrieli1,2

1 Program in Neuroscience and Departments of 2 Psychology, 3 Symbolic Systems and 4 Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Noam Sobel, Jordan Hall Bldg 420, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. e-mail: nsobel{at}leland.stanford.edu

Air flow-rate is usually higher in one nostril in comparison to the other. Also, within bounds, higher nasal flow-rate improves odorant detection. It follows from the above that odorant detection should be better in the nostril with higher flow-rate in comparison to the nostril with lower flow-rate. Paradoxically, previous research has shown that odorant detection thresholds are equal for the high and low flow-rate nostrils. Here we resolve this apparent paradox by showing that when detecting through the nostril with lower air flow-rate, humans sniffed longer than when detecting through the nostril with higher air flow-rate, thus equalizing performance between the nostrils. When this compensatory mechanism was blocked, a pronounced advantage in odorant detection was seen for the nostril with higher air flow-rate over the nostril with lower air flow-rate. Finally, we show that normal birhinal sniff duration may enable only one nostril to reach optimal threshold. This finding implies that during each sniff, each nostril conveys to the brain a slightly different image of the olfactory world. It remains to be shown how the brain combines these images into a single olfactory percept.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Lecoq, P. Tiret, and S. Charpak
Peripheral Adaptation Codes for High Odor Concentration in Glomeruli
J. Neurosci., March 11, 2009; 29(10): 3067 - 3072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. W. Wesson, J. V. Verhagen, and M. Wachowiak
Why Sniff Fast? The Relationship Between Sniff Frequency, Odor Discrimination, and Receptor Neuron Activation in the Rat
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 1089 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. Frasnelli, G. Charbonneau, O. Collignon, and F. Lepore
Odor Localization and Sniffing
Chem Senses, February 1, 2009; 34(2): 139 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. A. Boyle, J. Djordjevic, M. J. Olsson, J. N. Lundstrom, and M. Jones-Gotman
The Human Brain Distinguishes between Single Odorants and Binary Mixtures
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2009; 19(1): 66 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
D. W. Wesson, T. N. Donahou, M. O. Johnson, and M. Wachowiak
Sniffing Behavior of Mice during Performance in Odor-Guided Tasks
Chem Senses, September 1, 2008; 33(7): 581 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. N. Lundstrom, J. A. Boyle, and M. Jones-Gotman
Body Position-Dependent Shift in Odor Percept Present Only for Perithreshold Odors
Chem Senses, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 23 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. A. Lowry and L. M. Kay
Chemical Factors Determine Olfactory System Beta Oscillations in Waking Rats
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 394 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Kepecs, N. Uchida, and Z. F. Mainen
Rapid and Precise Control of Sniffing During Olfactory Discrimination in Rats
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 205 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. W. Scott, H. P. Acevedo, and L. Sherrill
Effects of Concentration and Sniff Flow Rate on the Rat Electroolfactogram
Chem Senses, July 1, 2006; 31(6): 581 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
R. A. Frank, R. C. Gesteland, J. Bailie, K. Rybalsky, A. Seiden, and M. F. Dulay
Characterization of the sniff magnitude test.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 2006; 132(5): 532 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
N. Buonviso, C. Amat, and P. Litaudon
Respiratory Modulation of Olfactory Neurons in the Rodent Brain
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 145 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. Mainland and N. Sobel
The Sniff Is Part of the Olfactory Percept
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 181 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. A. Schoenfeld and T. A. Cleland
Anatomical Contributions to Odorant Sampling and Representation in Rodents: Zoning in on Sniffing Behavior
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 131 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
K. Zhao, P. Dalton, G. C. Yang, and P. W. Scherer
Numerical Modeling of Turbulent and Laminar Airflow and Odorant Transport during Sniffing in the Human and Rat Nose
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. W. Scott
Sniffing and Spatiotemporal Coding in Olfaction
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 119 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. D. Mainland, B. N. Johnson, R. Khan, R. B. Ivry, and N. Sobel
Olfactory Impairments in Patients with Unilateral Cerebellar Lesions Are Selective to Inputs from the Contralesional Nostril
J. Neurosci., July 6, 2005; 25(27): 6362 - 6371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. Bensafi, S. Pouliot, and N. Sobel
Odorant-specific Patterns of Sniffing during Imagery Distinguish 'Bad' and 'Good' Olfactory Imagers
Chem Senses, July 1, 2005; 30(6): 521 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J.-P. Royet and J. Plailly
Lateralization of Olfactory Processes
Chem Senses, October 1, 2004; 29(8): 731 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. N. Johnson, J. D. Mainland, and N. Sobel
Rapid Olfactory Processing Implicates Subcortical Control of an Olfactomotor System
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2003; 90(2): 1084 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. A. Dade, R. J. Zatorre, and M. Jones-Gotman
Olfactory learning: convergent findings from lesion and brain imaging studies in humans
Brain, January 1, 2002; 125(1): 86 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Sobel, M. E. Thomason, I. Stappen, C. M. Tanner, J. W. Tetrud, J. M. Bower, E. V. Sullivan, and J. D. E. Gabrieli
An impairment in sniffing contributes to the olfactory impairment in Parkinson's disease
PNAS, March 16, 2001; (2001) 71061598.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Sobel, M. E. Thomason, I. Stappen, C. M. Tanner, J. W. Tetrud, J. M. Bower, E. V. Sullivan, and J. D. E. Gabrieli
An impairment in sniffing contributes to the olfactory impairment in Parkinson's disease
PNAS, March 27, 2001; 98(7): 4154 - 4159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.