Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laska, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laska, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 25: 47-53, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

‘Microsmatic’ Primates Revisited: Olfactory Sensitivity in the Squirrel Monkey

Matthias Laska, Alexandra Seibt and Andreas Weber

Department of Medical Psychology, University of Munich Medical School, Goethestraße 31, D-80336 Munich, Germany

Correspondence to be sent to: Matthias Laska, Department of Medical Psychology, University of Munich Medical School, Goethestraße 31, D-80336 Munich, Germany. e-mail: laska{at}imp.med.uni-muenchen.de

Using a conditioning paradigm, the olfactory sensitivity of three squirrel monkeys to nine odorants representing different chemical classes as well as members of a homologous series of substances was investigated. The animals significantly discriminated dilutions as low as 1:10 000 n-propionic acid, 1:30 000 n-butanoic acid and n-pentanoic acid, 1:100 000 n-hexanoic acid, 1:1Mio n-heptanoic acid, 1:30 000 1-pentanol, 1:300 000 1,8-cineole, 1:1Mio n-heptanal and 1:30Mio amyl acetate from the near-odorless solvent, with single individuals scoring even slightly better. The results showed (i) the squirrel monkey to have an unexpectedly high olfactory sensitivity, which for some substances matches or even is better than that of species such as the rat or the dog, and (ii) a significant negative correlation between perceptibility in terms of olfactory detection thresholds and carbon chain length of carboxylic acids. These findings support the assumptions that olfaction may play a significant and hitherto underestimated role in the regulation of primate behavior, and that the concept of primates as primarily visual and ‘microsmatic’ animals needs to be revised.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Lab AnimHome page
M Jennings, M J Prescott, Members of the Joint Working Group on Refinement (, H. M Buchanan-Smith, M. R Gamble, M. Gore, P. Hawkins, R. Hubrecht, S. Hudson, M. Jennings, et al.
Refinements in husbandry, care and common procedures for non-human primates: Ninth report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement
Lab Anim, April 1, 2009; 43(suppl_1): 1 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
H. Saito, Q. Chi, H. Zhuang, H. Matsunami, and J. D. Mainland
Odor Coding by a Mammalian Receptor Repertoire
Sci. Signal., March 3, 2009; 2(60): ra9 - ra9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Laska, R. M. R. Bautista, D. Hofelmann, V. Sterlemann, and L. T. H. Salazar
Olfactory sensitivity for putrefaction-associated thiols and indols in three species of non-human primate
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2007; 210(23): 4169 - 4178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
P. M. Wise, T. Miyazawa, M. Gallagher, and G. Preti
Human Odor Detection of Homologous Carboxylic Acids and Their Binary Mixtures
Chem Senses, June 1, 2007; 32(5): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E. Palagi and L. Dapporto
Beyond Odor Discrimination: Demonstrating Individual Recognition by Scent in Lemur Catta
Chem Senses, June 1, 2006; 31(5): 437 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
R. G. Vogt
How Sensitive Is a Nose?
Sci. Signal., February 14, 2006; 2006(322): pe8 - pe8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. Laska, A. Wieser, and L. T. Hernandez Salazar
Olfactory Responsiveness to Two Odorous Steroids in Three Species of Nonhuman Primates
Chem Senses, July 1, 2005; 30(6): 505 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
G. M. Shepherd
Outline of a Theory of Olfactory Processing and its Relevance to Humans
Chem Senses, January 1, 2005; 30(suppl_1): i3 - i5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. Laska, A. Wieser, R. M. Rivas Bautista, and L. T. Hernandez Salazar
Olfactory Sensitivity for Carboxylic Acids in Spider Monkeys and Pigtail Macaques
Chem Senses, February 1, 2004; 29(2): 101 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. Laska and N. Grimm
SURE, Why Not? The SUbstitution-REciprocity Method for Measurement of Odor Quality Discrimination Thresholds: Replication and Extension to Nonhuman Primates
Chem Senses, February 1, 2003; 28(2): 105 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Laska and A. Seibt
Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic alcohols in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2002; 205(11): 1633 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. E. Smith, A. J. Tomlinson, J. A. Mlotkiewicz, and D. H. Abbott
Female Marmoset Monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) Can Be Identified from the Chemical Composition of their Scent Marks
Chem Senses, June 1, 2001; 26(5): 449 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
D. Giorgi and S. Rouquier
LETTER TO THE EDITORS
Chem Senses, October 1, 2000; 25(5): 591 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.