Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laska, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saito, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laska, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saito, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 25: 189-197, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

Olfactory Discrimination Ability for Aliphatic Odorants as a Function of Oxygen Moiety

Matthias Laska1, Saho Ayabe-Kanamura2,3, Fabienne Hübener1 and Sachiko Saito2

1 Department of Medical Psychology, University of Munich Medical School, Goethestraße 31, D-80336 Munich, Germany, 2 National Institute of Bioscience and Human Technology, AIST, MITI and 3 Institute of Psychology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305, Japan

Correspondence to be sent to: Matthias Laska, Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Goethestraße 31, D-80336 München, Germany. e-mail: Laska{at}imp.med.uni-muenchen.de

We tested the ability of human subjects to distinguish between aliphatic odorants sharing the same number of carbon atoms but differing in their functional groups. 1-Alcohols, n-aldehydes, 2-ketones and n-carboxylic acids of four, six and eight carbon atoms, respectively, were employed. In a forced-choice triangular test procedure 20 subjects were repeatedly presented with 18 odor pairs and asked to identify the bottle containing the odd stimulus. We found (i) that as a group, the subjects performed significantly above chance level in all tasks and thus were clearly able to discriminate between all odor pairs presented; (ii) marked interindividual differences in discrimination performance, ranging from subjects who were able to significantly distinguish between all 18 odor pairs to subjects who failed to do so with 1/3 of the tasks; (iii) a lack of significant differences in performance between male and female, and between Japanese and German subjects; (iv) that odor pairs that involved 2-ketones and/or n-carboxylic acids were significantly easier to discriminate compared to odor pairs that involved 1-alcohols and/or n-aldehydes, and thus a clear dependence of discriminability on type of functional group; and (v) that aliphatic odorants with eight carbon atoms (irrespective of their oxygen moiety) were significantly more difficult to discriminate from each other compared to substances with four or six carbon atoms. The results suggest that functional groups may be an important determinant of the interaction between stimulus molecule and olfactory receptor in aliphatic substances, and thus may be a molecular property affecting odor quality in a substance class-specific manner.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. Laska
Olfactory Discrimination Ability for Aliphatic C6 Alcohols as a Function of Presence, Position, and Configuration of a Double Bond
Chem Senses, November 1, 2005; 30(9): 755 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. C. Daly, G. A. Wright, and B. H. Smith
Molecular Features of Odorants Systematically Influence Slow Temporal Responses Across Clusters of Coordinated Antennal Lobe Units in the Moth Manduca sexta
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 236 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. E. Reisenman, T. A. Christensen, W. Francke, and J. G. Hildebrand
Enantioselectivity of Projection Neurons Innervating Identified Olfactory Glomeruli
J. Neurosci., March 17, 2004; 24(11): 2602 - 2611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. Laska
Olfactory Discrimination Ability of Human Subjects for Enantiomers with an Isopropenyl Group at the Chiral Center
Chem Senses, February 1, 2004; 29(2): 143 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. Laska and N. Grimm
SURE, Why Not? The SUbstitution-REciprocity Method for Measurement of Odor Quality Discrimination Thresholds: Replication and Extension to Nonhuman Primates
Chem Senses, February 1, 2003; 28(2): 105 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. Laska
Olfactory Discrimination Ability for Aromatic Odorants as a Function of Oxygen Moiety
Chem Senses, January 1, 2002; 27(1): 23 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. Laska
Perception of Trigeminal Chemosensory Qualities in the Elderly
Chem Senses, July 1, 2001; 26(6): 681 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.