Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (44)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prescott, J.
Right arrow Articles by Swain-Campbell, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prescott, J.
Right arrow Articles by Swain-Campbell, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 25: 239-246, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

Responses to Repeated Oral Irritation by Capsaicin, Cinnamaldehyde and Ethanol in PROP Tasters and Non-tasters

John Prescott and Nicola Swain-Campbell

Sensory Science Research Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Correspondence to be sent to: John Prescott, Sensory Science Research Centre, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand. e-mail: john.prescott{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz

Both increases (sensitization) and decreases (desensitization) in oral irritation have been reported in response to repeated short-term stimulation by compounds such as capsaicin, zingerone and menthol. It is unclear why one irritant would show sensitization and another desensitization, and this is further complicated by substantial inter-individual variation in response patterns. These variations may be the result of individual differences such as that represented by sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), which has been associated with variation in the overall intensity of irritation. In addition, comparisons between irritants have almost always involved inter-study comparisons, entailing different subject groups and frequently different methods. In the studies reported here, responses to three irritants—capsaicin, cinnamaldehyde and ethanol—were examined as a function of PROP taster status. A common core of subjects also received all three irritants, allowing an assessment of the extent to which different response patterns between irritants seen previously were the result of different properties of the irritants themselves. Over a series of ten stimuli presented at 1 min intervals, PROP taster status differentiated subject responses on the basis of overall intensity, but not the pattern of responses over repeated stimulation. The group response to ethanol and cinnamaldehyde was desensitization, a pattern also shown by most of the individual subjects. In contrast, the group response to capsaicin was neither clear sensitization nor desensitization, reflecting much greater individual variability in response patterns. It is suggested that the time course to a single irritant stimulus largely determines between irritant response variations, while the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) used for a given irritant will have critical values for showing predominantly sensitization or desensitization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. L. Youngentob and J. I. Glendinning
From the Cover: Fetal ethanol exposure increases ethanol intake by making it smell and taste better
PNAS, March 31, 2009; 106(13): 5359 - 5364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. Lim, L. Urban, and B. G. Green
Measures of Individual Differences in Taste and Creaminess Perception
Chem Senses, July 1, 2008; 33(6): 493 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. E. Hayes, L. M. Bartoshuk, J. R. Kidd, and V. B. Duffy
Supertasting and PROP Bitterness Depends on More Than the TAS2R38 Gene
Chem Senses, March 1, 2008; 33(3): 255 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. W. Merrill, J. M. Cuellar, J. H. Judd, M. I. Carstens, and E. Carstens
Effects of TRPA1 Agonists Mustard Oil and Cinnamaldehyde on Lumbar Spinal Wide-Dynamic Range Neuronal Responses to Innocuous and Noxious Cutaneous Stimuli in Rats
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 415 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
K. C. Albin, M. I. Carstens, and E. Carstens
Modulation of Oral Heat and Cold Pain by Irritant Chemicals
Chem Senses, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 3 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. L. Zanotto, A. W. Merrill, M. I. Carstens, and E. Carstens
Neurons in Superficial Trigeminal Subnucleus Caudalis Responsive to Oral Cooling, Menthol, and Other Irritant Stimuli
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 966 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
L. M Bartoshuk, V. B Duffy, J. E Hayes, H. R Moskowitz, and D. J Snyder
Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives
Phil Trans R Soc B, July 29, 2006; 361(1471): 1137 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
G. Brand and L. Jacquot
Sensitization and Desensitization to Allyl Isothiocyanate (Mustard Oil) in the Nasal Cavity
Chem Senses, September 1, 2002; 27(7): 593 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
C. T. Simons, M. O'Mahony, and E. Carstens
Taste Suppression Following Lingual Capsaicin Pre-treatment in Humans
Chem Senses, May 1, 2002; 27(4): 353 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.