Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Opiekun, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fiedler, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Opiekun, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fiedler, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 25: 395-400, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

A Controlled Short-term Exposure Study to Investigate the Odor Differences Among Three Different Formulations of Gasoline

Richard E. Opiekun1,2, Kathie Kelly-McNeil1, Susan Knasko3,4, Paul Lioy1 and Nancy Fiedler1

1 Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute of Rutgers University and the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 170 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, 2 Joint PhD Program in Exposure Measurement and Assessment, Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey and The UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ and 3 Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA 4 Present address: Unilever Research USA, 45 River Road, Edgewater, NJ 07020, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Nancy Fiedler, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Room 210, 170 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. e-mail: nfiedler{at}eohsi.rutgers.edu

Control subjects (CON) and self-reported methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)-sensitive subjects (SRS) were evaluated to distinguish between the following gasoline blends: gasoline versus gasoline + MTBE (15% MTBE v/v); and gasoline versus gasoline + MTBE + reodorant. The study also investigated the ability of a reodorant to conceal the odor of MTBE in a gasoline mixture. In each of two separate sessions, seven men (four CON, three SRS) and seven women (four CON, three SRS) were asked, in a forced-choice format, to sniff 28 randomized bottle pairs to determine if the odors in each pair were the same or different. Chi-square analyses revealed that, with the exception of one male CON, subjects were unable to distinguish between gasoline and gasoline with MTBE or gasoline with MTBE and the reodorant. Thus, a reodorant is of limited value as an additive which alters the ability of an individual to detect MTBE in a blended gasoline. The results suggest that at the level used in the experiment, no mask would be required to blind a participant from the odor of MTBE if that level is used in a controlled human health effects study of the additive.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.