Chem. Senses 25: 517-523,
2000
© Oxford University Press 2000
Right-nostril Dominance in Discrimination of Unfamiliar, but Not Familiar, Odours
Departments of 1 Neuroscience, 2 Neurology and 3 Cardiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Correspondence to be sent to: Ivanka Savic, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Doktorsringen 12, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden. e-mail ivanka.savic-berglund{at}neuro.ki.se
In a recent PET study on processing of unfamiliar odours we observed that odour discrimination performance was superior during right compared with left nostril presentations, and that mainly the right cerebral hemisphere was activated. In the present study we investigated whether the asymmetric performance is present also during the processing of familiar odours. Seventy-one right-handed healthy subjects (age 21–49 years, 40 females) with normal nasal anatomy and olfactory thresholds participated. Forty pairs of odours (20 familiar and 20 unfamiliar) were presented in the same/different paradigm, alternating nostrils and balancing the order. The number of errors during the discrimination task was compared with respect to nostril and odour familiarity. The overall odour discrimination performance was superior on the right side. However, this difference was valid only for unfamiliar odours, whereas the performance for familiar odours was symmetrical. Familiar odours were easier to discriminate than unfamiliar ones. The present data are congruent with the idea of a semantic influence on odour processing. Odours seem to be processed with a right sided preponderance when not clearly familiar, and symmetrically when language becomes involved. Future studies on odour processing should therefore take into account odour familiarity and side of presentation.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. A. Levitan, M. Zampini, R. Li, and C. Spence Assessing the Role of Color Cues and People's Beliefs About Color-Flavor Associations on the Discrimination of the Flavor of Sugar-Coated Chocolates Chem Senses, June 1, 2008; 33(5): 415 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Chen and B. P. Halpern Retronasal but Not Oral-Cavity-Only Identification of "Purely Olfactory" Odorants Chem Senses, February 1, 2008; 33(2): 107 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P.-M. Lledo, G. Gheusi, and J.-D. Vincent Information Processing in the Mammalian Olfactory System Physiol Rev, January 1, 2005; 85(1): 281 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. I Rupp, W. W. Fleischhacker, G. Kemmler, H. Oberbauer, A. W Scholtz, C. Wanko, and H. Hinterhuber Various Bilateral Olfactory Deficits in Male Patients With Schizophrenia Schizophr Bull, January 1, 2005; 31(1): 155 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Small, J. Voss, Y. E. Mak, K. B. Simmons, T. Parrish, and D. Gitelman Experience-Dependent Neural Integration of Taste and Smell in the Human Brain J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1892 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. V. Parr, D. Heatherbell, and K. G. White Demystifying Wine Expertise: Olfactory Threshold, Perceptual Skill and Semantic Memory in Expert and Novice Wine Judges Chem Senses, October 1, 2002; 27(8): 747 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Cerf-Ducastel, P.-F. Van de Moortele, P. MacLeod, D. Le Bihan, and A. Faurion Interaction of Gustatory and Lingual Somatosensory Perceptions at the Cortical Level in the Human: a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Chem Senses, May 1, 2001; 26(4): 371 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|