Chem. Senses 25: 761-768,
2000
© Oxford University Press 2000
Effects of Air Flow on Rat Electroolfactogram
1 Department of Psychology, Spelman College, Atlanta, GA 30314-4399 and 2 Department of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322-3030, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: John W. Scott, Department of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1648 Pierce Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322-3030, USA. e-mail: johns{at}cellbio.emory.edu
The electroolfactogram (EOG) previously has been used to demonstrate the regional distribution of rat olfactory epithelial odorant responses. Here, we evaluated the effects of airflow parameters on EOGs in two preparations: one where odorants were directly applied to the epithelium (opened preparation) and one where odorants were drawn through the nasal passages by an artificial sniff (closed preparation). EOG rise times served as one measure of odorant access. For isoamyl acetate (but not for limonene), rise times were slower in the lateral recesses of the closed (but not the opened) preparation. Polar odorants (amyl acetate, carvone and benzaldehyde) evoked smaller responses in the closed preparation than in the opened preparation, and these responses were particularly depressed in the lateral regions of the closed preparation. Responses to nonpolar hydrocarbon odorants (limonene and benzene) were equal in the lateral regions of both preparations, but were somewhat depressed in the medial region of the closed preparation. The responses to some polar odorants in the closed preparation were sensitive to changes in airflow parameters. These data suggest that the sorptive properties of the nose contribute substantially to determining the response of the epithelium and act to increase differences produced by inherent receptor mechanisms.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. Oka, Y. Takai, and K. Touhara Nasal Airflow Rate Affects the Sensitivity and Pattern of Glomerular Odorant Responses in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb J. Neurosci., September 30, 2009; 29(39): 12070 - 12078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M. Carey, J. V. Verhagen, D. W. Wesson, N. Pirez, and M. Wachowiak Temporal Structure of Receptor Neuron Input to the Olfactory Bulb Imaged in Behaving Rats J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 1073 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. C. Cheung, R. M. Carey, and M. Wachowiak A Method for Generating Natural and User-Defined Sniffing Patterns in Anesthetized or Reduced Preparations Chem Senses, January 1, 2009; 34(1): 63 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Scott, H. P. Acevedo, L. Sherrill, and M. Phan Responses of the Rat Olfactory Epithelium to Retronasal Air Flow J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 1941 - 1950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Slotnick Olfactory Performance of Rats after Selective Deafferentation of the Olfactory Bulb by 3-Methyl Indole Chem Senses, February 1, 2007; 32(2): 173 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. McBride and B. Slotnick Discrimination between the Enantiomers of Carvone and of Terpinen-4-ol Odorants in Normal Rats and Those with Lesions of the Olfactory Bulbs J. Neurosci., September 27, 2006; 26(39): 9892 - 9901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Scott, H. P. Acevedo, and L. Sherrill Effects of Concentration and Sniff Flow Rate on the Rat Electroolfactogram Chem Senses, July 1, 2006; 31(6): 581 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Schoenfeld and T. A. Cleland Anatomical Contributions to Odorant Sampling and Representation in Rodents: Zoning in on Sniffing Behavior Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 131 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Scott Sniffing and Spatiotemporal Coding in Olfaction Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 119 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|