Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vosshall, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vosshall, L. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 26: 207-213, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001


SYMPOSIUM: AChemS XXII Symposium

The Molecular Logic of Olfaction in Drosophila

Leslie B. Vosshall

Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, 701 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA

Correspondence to be sent to current address: Leslie B. Vosshall, Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior, Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, Box 63, New York, NY 10021, USA. e-mail: leslie{at}mail.rockefeller.edu

Abstract

Drosophila fruit flies display robust olfactory-driven behaviors with an olfactory system far simpler than that of vertebrates. Endowed with ~1300 olfactory receptor neurons, these insects are able to recognize and discriminate between a large number of distinct odorants. Candidate odorant receptor molecules were identified by complimentary approaches of differential cloning and genome analysis. The Drosophila odorant receptor (DOR) genes encode a novel family of proteins with seven predicted membrane-spanning domains, unrelated to vertebrate or nematode chemosensory receptors. There are on the order of 60 or more members of this gene family in the Drosophila genome, far fewer than the hundreds to thousands of receptors found in vertebrates or nematodes. DOR genes are selectively expressed in small subsets of olfactory neurons, in expression domains that are spatially conserved between individuals, bilaterally symmetric and not sexually dimorphic. Double in situ RNA hybridization with a number of pairwise combinations of DOR genes fails to reveal any overlap in gene expression, suggesting that each olfactory neuron expresses one or a small number of receptor genes and is therefore functionally distinct. How is activation of such a subpopulation of olfactory receptor neurons in the periphery sensed by the brain? In the mouse, all neurons expressing a given receptor project with precision to two of 1800 olfactory bulb glomeruli, creating a spatial map of odor quality in the brain. We have employed DOR promoter transgenes that recapitulate expression of endogenous receptor to visualize the projections of individual populations of receptor neurons to subsets of the 43 glomeruli in the Drosophila antennal lobe. The results suggest functional conservation in the logic of olfactory discrimination from insects to mammals.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S. Ulland, E. Ian, A.-K. Borg-Karlson, and H. Mustaparta
Discrimination between Enantiomers of Linalool by Olfactory Receptor Neurons in the Cabbage Moth Mamestra brassicae (L.)
Chem Senses, May 1, 2006; 31(4): 325 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
N. Chaline, J.-C. Sandoz, S. J. Martin, F. L.W. Ratnieks, and G. R. Jones
Learning and Discrimination of Individual Cuticular Hydrocarbons by Honeybees (Apis mellifera)
Chem Senses, May 1, 2005; 30(4): 327 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
T. Nakagawa, T. Sakurai, T. Nishioka, and K. Touhara
Insect Sex-Pheromone Signals Mediated by Specific Combinations of Olfactory Receptors
Science, March 11, 2005; 307(5715): 1638 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. M. Grozinger, N. M. Sharabash, C. W. Whitfield, and G. E. Robinson
Pheromone-mediated gene expression in the honey bee brain
PNAS, November 25, 2003; 100(suppl_2): 14519 - 14525.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. L. Roelofs and A. P. Rooney
Molecular genetics and evolution of pheromone biosynthesis in Lepidoptera
PNAS, August 5, 2003; 100(16): 9179 - 9184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
I. Ganguly, T. F. C. Mackay, and R. R. H. Anholt
Scribble Is Essential for Olfactory Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1447 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
S. Scherer, R. F. Stocker, and B. Gerber
Olfactory Learning in Individually Assayed Drosophila Larvae
Learn. Mem., May 1, 2003; 10(3): 217 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. C. Stensmyr, E. Giordano, A. Balloi, A.-M. Angioy, and B. S. Hansson
Novel natural ligands for Drosophila olfactory receptor neurones
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2003; 206(4): 715 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
D. S. Hekmat-Scafe, C. R. Scafe, A. J. McKinney, and M. A. Tanouye
Genome-Wide Analysis of the Odorant-Binding Protein Gene Family in Drosophila melanogaster
Genome Res., September 1, 2002; 12(9): 1357 - 1369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. G. Vogt, M. E. Rogers, M.-d. Franco, and M. Sun
A comparative study of odorant binding protein genes: differential expression of the PBP1-GOBP2 gene cluster in Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera) and the organization of OBP genes in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera)
J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2002; 205(6): 719 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.