Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanamori, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanamori, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 26: 897-903, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Effects of Various Ion Transport Inhibitors on the Water Response in the Superior Laryngeal Nerve in Rats

Takamitsu Hanamori

Department of Physiology, Miyazaki Medical College, Kiyotake, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan

Correspondence to be sent to: Takamitsu Hanamori, Department of Physiology, Miyazaki Medical College, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake-cho, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan. e-mail: thanamo{at}post1.miyazaki-med.ac.jp

The effects of inhibitors [acetazolamide, an inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase; amiloride, an inhibitor of the Na channel; furosemide, an inhibitor of the Na/K/2Cl transporter; 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (DIDS), an inhibitor of the Cl channel] on the water response in the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) were investigated using whole nerve recordings from the SLN of anesthetized and paralyzed rats. Changes in spontaneous activity in the SLN after i.v. injection of a hypo- or hypertonic solution were also investigated. The water response to higher concentration amiloride solutions (0.1, 1, 5 and 10 mM) were significantly smaller in comparison with the control, i.e. the water response to deionized water (88–59% of the control, Fisher’s PLSD, P < 0.05). DIDS suppressed the water response significantly at concentrations of 0.5 and 2 mM by 18 and 33%, respectively (P < 0.05). Likewise, acetazolamide (2 mM) and furosemide (5 mM) significantly suppressed the water response by 9 and 40%, respectively (P < 0.05). An i.v. bolus injection of a hypertonic solution (1 ml of 1.5 M NaCl or 1.0 M mannitol) depressed spontaneous activity of the SLN. In contrast, an i.v. injection of a hypotonic solution (0.015 M NaCl) increased spontaneous activity. These results suggest that several ion transporters and ion channels, as well as carbonic anhydrase, that may exist in the dorsal surface in the epiglottis may regulate the water response in the SLN and that osmotic changes in the dorsal surface of the epiglottis and in the interstitial space can affect nerve activity in the SLN.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
S. I. Sollars and D. L. Hill
In vivo recordings from rat geniculate ganglia: taste response properties of individual greater superficial petrosal and chorda tympani neurones
J. Physiol., May 1, 2005; 564(3): 877 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.