Chem. Senses 26: 993-1003,
2001
© Oxford University Press 2001
Binary Taste Mixture Interactions in PROP Non-tasters, Medium-tasters and Super-tasters
Sensory Science Research Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 1 Qi Statistics, King's Lynn, Norfolk, UK
Correspondence to be sent to: John Prescott, Sensory Science Research Centre, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand. e-mail: john.prescott{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz
It is generally assumed that the mutual, but asymmetric, suppression of the components in binary taste mixtures is an invariant property of the human psychophysical response to such mixtures. However, taste intensities have been shown to vary as a function of individual differences in sensitivity, indexed by the perceived bitterness of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). To determine if these variations in taste perception influence taste mixture interactions, groups of PROP super-, medium- and non-tasters assessed four binary taste mixtures: sweet-bitter [sucrose/quinine hydrochloride (QHCl)], sweet-sour (sucrose/citric acid), salty-bitter (NaCl/QHCl) and salty-sour (NaCl/citric acid). In each experiment, subjects received factorial combinations of four levels of each of two tastants and rated individual taste intensities and overall mixture intensity. For each taste quality, super-tasters typically gave higher ratings than either medium- or non-tasters, who tended not to differ. There were also group differences in the interactions of the mixtures' components. Super-tasters rated the overall intensity of the mixtures, most likely reflecting integration of the taste components, as greater than medium- and non-tasters, who again showed few differences. In sweet-bitter mixtures, non-tasters failed to show the suppression of sweetness intensity by the highest QHCl concentration that was evident in super- and medium-tasters. These data show that the perception of both tastes and binary taste mixture interactions varies as a function of PROP taster status, but that this may only be evident when three taster groups are clearly distinguished from one another.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Talavera, K. Yasumatsu, R. Yoshida, R. F. Margolskee, T. Voets, Y. Ninomiya, and B. Nilius The taste transduction channel TRPM5 is a locus for bitter-sweet taste interactions FASEB J, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1343 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Hayes and V. B. Duffy Revisiting Sugar-Fat Mixtures: Sweetness and Creaminess Vary with Phenotypic Markers of Oral Sensation Chem Senses, March 1, 2007; 32(3): 225 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Mojet, J. Heidema, and E. Christ-Hazelhof Effect of Concentration on Taste-Taste Interactions in Foods for Elderly and Young Subjects Chem Senses, October 1, 2004; 29(8): 671 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. G. Green and P. George 'Thermal Taste' Predicts Higher Responsiveness to Chemical Taste and Flavor Chem Senses, September 1, 2004; 29(7): 617 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|