Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lugaz, O.
Right arrow Articles by Faurion, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lugaz, O.
Right arrow Articles by Faurion, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 27: 105-115, 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

A New Specific Ageusia

Some Humans Cannot Taste L-Glutamate

O. Lugaz, A.-M. Pillias and A. Faurion

Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Sensorielle, 1 avenue des Olympiades, F-91744 Massy cedex and EA 359, Université Paris VII, France

Correspondence to be sent to: Dr Annick Faurion, Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Sensorielle, 1 avenue des Olympiades, F-91744 Massy cedex, France. e-mail: faurion{at}ccr.jussieu.fr

A new specific ageusia was found in human subjects for monosodium L-glutamate (MSG). Four tests were successively applied to discriminate non-tasters and hypotasters from tasters. (i) NaCl and MSG thresholds, and (ii) suprathreshold sensitivity were evaluated using the up-and-down procedure. Only 73% of 109 subjects common to both tests demonstrated a sensitivity for MSG significantly higher than their sensitivity to NaCl, and hence a specific sensitivity to L-glutamate. The remaining 27% who showed no significant difference in sensitivity to MSG and NaCl solutions were considered as putative hypotasters. (iii) Perception profiles (time—intensity) for MSG and NaCl were tested in 58 subjects and appeared significantly different in 47 tasters (81%). This technique helped in identifying among putative hypotasters of tests 1 and 2 a few tasters who perceived equal intensity for isoconcentration of NaCl and MSG but who could discriminate isomolar solutions on other cues. Thus, 19% of subjects, for whom no significant differences were found between MSG and NaCl time—intensity profiles, remained in the hypotaster group. (iv) A discrimination task including 24 triangular presentations per subject of NaCl and MSG 29 mM applied to the eight most severe hypotasters showed that two subjects at least (two of 58; 3.5%) could not discriminate between both stimuli. Moreover, these subjects probably perceived identical sensations for MSG and NaCl solutions. The six other hypotasters (10.3%) could discriminate both stimuli at the limit of significance. None of these eight subjects were able to identify the typical umami taste in 29 mM MSG.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
U.-k. Kim, S. Wooding, N. Riaz, L. B. Jorde, and D. Drayna
Variation in the Human TAS1R Taste Receptor Genes
Chem Senses, September 1, 2006; 31(7): 599 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. Lim and H. T. Lawless
Qualitative Differences of Divalent Salts: Multidimensional Scaling and Cluster Analysis
Chem Senses, November 1, 2005; 30(9): 719 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
U.-K. Kim, P.A.S. Breslin, D. Reed, and D. Drayna
Genetics of Human Taste Perception
Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 2004; 83(6): 448 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.