Chem. Senses 27: 123-131,
2002
© Oxford University Press 2002
Cross-adaptation and Bitterness Inhibition of L-Tryptophan, L-Phenylalanine and Urea
Further Support for Shared Peripheral Physiology
Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Paul A.S. Breslin, Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. e-mail: breslin{at}monell.org
A previous study investigating individuals' bitterness sensitivities found a close association among three compounds: L-tryptophan (L-trp), L-phenylalanine (L-phe) and urea (Delwiche et al., 2001, Percept. Psychophys. 63, 761-776). In the present experiment, psychophysical cross-adaptation and bitterness inhibition experiments were performed on these three compounds to determine whether the bitterness could be differentially affected by either technique. If the two experimental approaches failed to differentiate L-trp, L-phe and urea's bitterness, then we may infer they share peripheral physiological mechanisms involved in bitter taste. All compounds were intensity matched in each of 13 subjects, so the judgments of adaptation or bitterness inhibition would be based on equal initial magnitudes and, therefore, directly comparable. In the first experiment, cross-adaptation of bitterness between the amino acids was high (>80%) and reciprocal. Urea and quinine-HCl (control) did not cross-adapt with the amino acids symmetrically. In a second experiment, the sodium salts, NaCl and Na gluconate, did not differentially inhibit the bitterness of L-trp, L-phe and urea, but the control compound, MgSO4, was differentially affected. The bitter inhibition experiment supports the hypothesis that L-trp, L-phe and urea share peripheral bitter taste mechanisms, while the adaptation experiment revealed subtle differences between urea and the amino acids indicating that urea and the amino acids activate only partially overlapping bitter taste mechanisms.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Grover and M. E. Frank Regional Specificity of Chlorhexidine Effects on Taste Perception Chem Senses, April 1, 2008; 33(4): 311 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. I. Glendinning How Do Predators Cope With Chemically Defended Foods? Biol. Bull., December 1, 2007; 213(3): 252 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. S.J. Keast and J. Roper A Complex Relationship among Chemical Concentration, Detection Threshold, and Suprathreshold Intensity of Bitter Compounds Chem Senses, March 1, 2007; 32(3): 245 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Rodgers, J. Busch, H. Peters, and E. Christ-Hazelhof Building a Tree of Knowledge: Analysis of Bitter Molecules Chem Senses, September 1, 2005; 30(7): 547 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Kuhn, B. Bufe, M. Winnig, T. Hofmann, O. Frank, M. Behrens, T. Lewtschenko, J. P. Slack, C. D. Ward, and W. Meyerhof Bitter Taste Receptors for Saccharin and Acesulfame K J. Neurosci., November 10, 2004; 24(45): 10260 - 10265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. S.J. Keast, T. M. Canty, and P. A.S. Breslin The Influence of Sodium Salts on Binary Mixtures of Bitter-tasting Compounds Chem Senses, June 1, 2004; 29(5): 431 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. S.J. Keast, M. M.E. Bournazel, and P. A.S. Breslin A Psychophysical Investigation of Binary Bitter-compound Interactions Chem Senses, May 1, 2003; 28(4): 301 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. I. Glendinning, A. Davis, and S. Ramaswamy Contribution of Different Taste Cells and Signaling Pathways to the Discrimination of "Bitter" Taste Stimuli by an Insect J. Neurosci., August 15, 2002; 22(16): 7281 - 7287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|