Chem. Senses 27: 759-768,
2002
© Oxford University Press 2002
Influence of Test Duration on the Sensitivity of the Two-bottle Choice Test
Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Michael G. Tordoff, Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19103-3308, USA. e-mail: tordoff{at}monell.org.
The long-term two-bottle choice test is commonly used as a simple screen to examine the acceptance of taste solutions by rodents. As part of an investigation of factors influencing the sensitivity of the two-bottle choice test, we determined the extent to which test duration influenced test sensitivity. C57BL6/J and 129X1/SvJ mice received four series of eight two-bottle tests, with each test lasting 1, 2, 4 or 6 days. Each series involved sequential tests with water, 2 mM saccharin, 5 and 50 mM citric acid, 30 and 300 µM quinine hydrochloride, 75 mM NaCl and 10% ethanol. There were significant differences between the strains in intake of saccharin, 5 and 50 mM citric acid, NaCl and ethanol in 4 and 6 day tests, but only saccharin and ethanol in 2 day tests, and 5 mM citric acid and ethanol in 1 day tests. To compare the sensitivity of the tests, we developed an analytical approach based on the comparison of deviations of individual 129X1/SvJ mice from the C57BL6/J strain mean. Our results suggest that to discriminate between strains or treatments when using `standard' laboratory conditions and methods, 1 day tests are generally inadequate and 2 day tests are useful only if large effects are anticipated. Tests lasting 4 or 6 days are more sensitive, but conducting 6 day tests provides little additional benefit and sometimes is detrimental relative to conducting 4 day tests.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. G. Tordoff Taste Solution Preferences of C57BL/6J and 129X1/SvJ Mice: Influence of Age, Sex, and Diet Chem Senses, September 1, 2007; 32(7): 655 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Inoue, D. R. Reed, X. Li, M. G. Tordoff, G. K. Beauchamp, and A. A. Bachmanov Allelic Variation of the Tas1r3 Taste Receptor Gene Selectively Affects Behavioral and Neural Taste Responses to Sweeteners in the F2 Hybrids between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J Mice J. Neurosci., March 3, 2004; 24(9): 2296 - 2303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Smith Richards, B. N. Belton, B. York, and J. Volaufova Mice bearing Acads mutation display altered postingestive but not 5-s orosensory response to dietary fat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): R311 - R319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Tordoff and A. A. Bachmanov Mouse Taste Preference Tests: Why Only Two Bottles? Chem Senses, May 1, 2003; 28(4): 315 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


