Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsukatani, T.
Right arrow Articles by Costanzo, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsukatani, T.
Right arrow Articles by Costanzo, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 28: 25-32, 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003

Detection Thresholds for Phenyl Ethyl Alcohol Using Serial Dilutions in Different Solvents

Toshiaki Tsukatani1,2, Takaki Miwa2, Mitsuru Furukawa2 and Richard M. Costanzo1

1 Department of Physiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0551, USA 2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8640, Japan

Correspondence to be sent to: Richard M. Costanzo, Department of Physiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0551, USA. e-mail: rcostanz{at}mail2.vcu.edu

Detection thresholds are typically obtained by presenting a subject with serial dilutions of an odorant. Many factors, including the solvent used to dilute the odorant, can influence the measurement of detection thresholds. Differences have been reported in detection thresholds for phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA) when different solvents are used. In this study we used gas chromatography (GC) to investigate further the effect of solvent on odor detection thresholds. We used a single ascending method and serial dilutions of PEA in four different solvents—liquid paraffin (LP), mineral oil (MO), propylene glycol (PG) and dipropylene glycol (DPG)—to determine the PEA thresholds for 31 adult subjects. For each solvent, we prepared eight serial log base 10 step dilutions (1-8), with corresponding liquid PEA concentrations of 6.3 x 101-6.3 x 10-6 (% v/v). We found that the threshold concentrations for PEA in LP (step 6.5) and PEA in MO (step 5.5) were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than for PEA in PG (step 4.0) and DPG (step 4.0) We then used GC to measure both the liquid and gas PEA concentrations for the dilution steps prepared with LP and PG. Although there were large threshold differences in the liquid concentrations of PEA in LP and PG, the headspace gas concentrations of PEA were the same. These results demonstrate the importance of determining the gas concentration of odorant stimuli when performing odor threshold measurements, in particular when comparing odor detection thresholds obtained using different solvents.

Key words: gas chromatography, headspace gas, human detection threshold, olfaction, partition coefficient


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. D. Mainland, B. N. Johnson, R. Khan, R. B. Ivry, and N. Sobel
Olfactory Impairments in Patients with Unilateral Cerebellar Lesions Are Selective to Inputs from the Contralesional Nostril
J. Neurosci., July 6, 2005; 25(27): 6362 - 6371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. E. Cometto-Muniz, W. S. Cain, and M. H. Abraham
Quantification of Chemical Vapors in Chemosensory Research
Chem Senses, July 1, 2003; 28(6): 467 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.