Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eylam, S.
Right arrow Articles by Spector, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eylam, S.
Right arrow Articles by Spector, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 28: 447-458, 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003

Oral Amiloride Treatment Decreases Taste Sensitivity to Sodium Salts in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J Mice

Shachar Eylam and Alan C. Spector

Department of Psychology and the Center for Smell and Taste, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Alan C. Spector, Department of Psychology, PO Box 112250, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2250, USA. e-mail: spector{at}ufl.edu

Sodium taste transduction is thought to occur via an amiloride-sensitive, sodium-selective pathway and an amiloride-insensitive, cation nonselective, anion-dependent pathway(s). It has been shown by others that amiloride, an epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) blocker, significantly reduces the chorda tympani nerve response to lingually applied NaCl in C57BL/6 (B6) mice but not in DBA/2 (D2) mice, suggesting that the latter strain might not possess functional ENaCs in taste receptor cells. We psychophysically measured and compared taste detection thresholds of NaCl and sodium gluconate (NaGlu) prepared with and without 100 µM amiloride in these two strains (eight/strain). Mice were trained and tested in a two-response operant signal detection procedure conducted in a gustometer. Surprisingly, no strain effect was found for the detection thresholds of both salts (~0.05–0.06 M). Moreover, these thresholds were increased by almost an order of magnitude by amiloride adulteration of the solutions. This marked effect of amiloride on sodium detection thresholds suggests that ENaCs are necessary for normal sensitivity to sodium salts in both strains. In addition, because NaGlu is thought to stimulate primarily the amiloride-sensitive pathway, especially at low concentrations, the similarity of NaCl and NaGlu thresholds (r > 0.81 both strains) suggests that ENaCs are also sufficient to support the detection of sodium in weak solutions by B6 and D2 mice.

Key words: animal psychophysics, epithelial sodium channels, gustatory system, inbred mice, sodium chloride


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
Y. Ishiwatari and A. A. Bachmanov
A High-Throughput Method to Measure NaCl and Acid Taste Thresholds in Mice
Chem Senses, May 1, 2009; 34(4): 277 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. D. Dotson and A. C. Spector
Behavioral Discrimination between Sucrose and Other Natural Sweeteners in Mice: Implications for the Neural Coding of T1R Ligands
J. Neurosci., October 17, 2007; 27(42): 11242 - 11253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
Y. Treesukosol, V. Lyall, G. L. Heck, J. A. DeSimone, and A. C. Spector
A psychophysical and electrophysiological analysis of salt taste in Trpv1 null mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): R1799 - R1809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. Ohkuri, K. Yasumatsu, N. Shigemura, R. Yoshida, and Y. Ninomiya
Amiloride Inhibition on NaCl Responses of the Chorda Tympani Nerve in Two 129 Substrains of Mice, 129P3/J and 129X1/SvJ
Chem Senses, July 1, 2006; 31(6): 565 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E.R. Delay, N.P. Hernandez, K. Bromley, and R.F. Margolskee
Sucrose and Monosodium Glutamate Taste Thresholds and Discrimination Ability of T1R3 Knockout Mice
Chem Senses, May 1, 2006; 31(4): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Cogn Neurosci RevHome page
A. C. Spector and S. P. Travers
The representation of taste quality in the Mammalian nervous system.
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, September 1, 2005; 4(3): 143 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. I. Glendinning, L. D. Bloom, M. Onishi, K. H. Zheng, S. Damak, R. F. Margolskee, and A. C. Spector
Contribution of {alpha}-Gustducin to Taste-guided Licking Responses of Mice
Chem Senses, May 1, 2005; 30(4): 299 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. Eylam and A. C. Spector
Taste discrimination between NaCl and KCl is disrupted by amiloride in inbred mice with amiloride-insensitive chorda tympani nerves
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): R1361 - R1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S. Eylam and A. C. Spector
Stimulus Processing of Glycine is Dissociable from that of Sucrose and Glucose Based on Behaviorally Measured Taste Signal Detection in Sac 'Taster' and 'Non-taster' Mice
Chem Senses, September 1, 2004; 29(7): 639 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
S. Eylam, T. Tracy, M. Garcea, and A. C. Spector
Amiloride is an Ineffective Conditioned Stimulus in Taste Aversion Learning in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J Mice
Chem Senses, October 1, 2003; 28(8): 681 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. M. Nelson, S. D. Munger, and J. D. Boughter Jr
Taste Sensitivities to PROP and PTC Vary Independently in Mice
Chem Senses, October 1, 2003; 28(8): 695 - 704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.