Chem. Senses 28: 691-694,
2003
© Oxford University Press 2003
Ratings of Overall Olfactory Function
1 Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Dresden, Germany 2 Unité de Rhinologie-Olfactologie, Clinique et Policlinique d’ORL, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
Correspondence to be sent to: Basile N. Landis, MD; Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany. e-mail: Basile.Landis{at}hcuge.ch
The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of self-reported ratings of olfactory function in 83 healthy subjects. Such ratings were compared with quantitative measures of olfactory function, as well as with ratings of nasal patency. In experiment 1 subjects rated olfactory function and nasal patency before olfactory testing, whereas in experiment 2 the reverse was the case. No feedback regarding test results were provided until after completion of the testing. The principal findings were: (i) when ratings preceded measurements of olfactory function, there was no significant correlation between the two parameters. However, ratings of olfactory function correlated significantly with ratings of nasal airway patency. (ii) In contrast, when measurements of olfactory function preceded the ratings, this constellation switched. Now ratings of olfactory function correlated significantly with measured olfactory function, whereas there was no significant correlation between ratings of nasal airway patency and ratings of olfactory function. In conclusion, these data suggest that ratings of olfactory function are unreliable in healthy, untrained subjects. The ratings seem to reflect changes of nasal airway patency to a larger degree than measurable olfactory function. The results further indicate that this is mainly due to the limited attention the sense of smell receives in daily life.
Key words: nasal airflow sensation, self-rating, smell
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. P. Schumm, M. McClintock, S. Williams, S. Leitsch, J. Lundstrom, T. Hummel, and S. T. Lindau Assessment of Sensory Function in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, November 1, 2009; 64B(suppl_1): i76 - i85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Gudziol and T. Hummel Effects of Pentoxifylline on Olfactory Sensitivity: A Postmarketing Surveillance Study Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, March 1, 2009; 135(3): 291 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. N. Landis, P. R. Burkhard, J. H. Friedman, K. L. Chou, and M. M. Amick RHINORRHEA AND OLFACTION IN PARKINSON DISEASE Neurology, September 23, 2008; 71(13): 1041 - 1042. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Frank, R. C. Gesteland, J. Bailie, K. Rybalsky, A. Seiden, and M. F. Dulay Characterization of the sniff magnitude test. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 2006; 132(5): 532 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Reden, A. Mueller, C. Mueller, I. Konstantinidis, J. Frasnelli, B. N. Landis, and T. Hummel Recovery of olfactory function following closed head injury or infections of the upper respiratory tract. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, March 1, 2006; 132(3): 265 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Bonfils, P. Avan, P. Faulcon, and D. Malinvaud Distorted Odorant Perception: Analysis of a Series of 56 Patients With Parosmia Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, February 1, 2005; 131(2): 107 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Lotsch, C. Lange, and T. Hummel A Simple and Reliable Method for Clinical Assessment of Odor Thresholds Chem Senses, May 1, 2004; 29(4): 311 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|