Chem. Senses 29: 127-135,
2004
© Oxford University Press 2004
Different Thresholds for Detection and Discrimination of Odors in the Honey bee (Apis mellifera)
Department of Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Department of Entomology, 318 West 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. e-mail: wright.571{at}osu.edu
Naturally occurring odors used by animals for mate recognition, food identification and other purposes must be detected at concentrations that vary across several orders of magnitude. Olfactory systems must therefore have the capacity to represent odors over a large range of concentrations regardless of dramatic changes in the salience, or perceived intensity, of a stimulus. The stability of the representation of an odor relative to other odors across concentration has not been extensively evaluated. We tested the ability of honey bees to discriminate pure odorants across a range of concentrations at and above their detection threshold. Our study showed that pure odorant compounds became progressively easier for honey bees to discriminate with increasing concentration. Discrimination is, therefore, a function of odorant concentration. We hypothesize that the recruitment of sensory cell populations across a range of concentrations may be important for odor coding, perhaps by changing its perceptual qualities or by increasing its salience against background stimuli, and that this mechanism is a general property of olfactory systems.
Key words: coding, concentration, discrimination, honey bee, invariance, olfaction
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. C. Fernandez, F. F. Locatelli, N. Person-Rennell, G. Deleo, and B. H. Smith Associative Conditioning Tunes Transient Dynamics of Early Olfactory Processing J. Neurosci., August 19, 2009; 29(33): 10191 - 10202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. A. Wright, A. F. Choudhary, and M. A. Bentley Reward quality influences the development of learned olfactory biases in honeybees Proc R Soc B, July 22, 2009; 276(1667): 2597 - 2604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. C. Daly, L. A. Carrell, and E. Mwilaria Characterizing Psychophysical Measures of Discrimination Thresholds and the Effects of Concentration on Discrimination Learning in the Moth Manduca sexta Chem Senses, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 95 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. A. Wright, J. A. Mustard, S. M. Kottcamp, and B. H. Smith Olfactory memory formation and the influence of reward pathway during appetitive learning by honey bees J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2007; 210(22): 4024 - 4033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Cunningham, C. J Moore, M. P Zalucki, and B. W Cribb Insect odour perception: recognition of odour components by flower foraging moths Proc R Soc B, August 22, 2006; 273(1597): 2035 - 2040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A Wright, M. G.A Thomson, and B. H Smith Odour concentration affects odour identity in honeybees Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2005; 272(1579): 2417 - 2422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. T. Skiri, M. Stranden, J. C. Sandoz, R. Menzel, and H. Mustaparta Associative learning of plant odorants activating the same or different receptor neurones in the moth Heliothis virescens J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2005; 208(4): 787 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|