Skip Navigation

Chemical Senses 2004 29(8):721-729; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh081
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heyer, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Delay, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heyer, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Delay, E. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chemical Senses Vol. 29 No. 8 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Monosodium Glutamate and Sweet Taste: Discrimination between the Tastes of Sweet Stimuli and Glutamate in Rats

Beth R. Heyer, Carol C. Taylor-Burds, Jeremiah D. Mitzelfelt and Eugene R. Delay

Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Regis University, Denver, CO 80221, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Eugene R. Delay, Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Regis University, 3333 Regis Blvd, Denver, CO 80221, USA. e-mail: edelay{at}regis.edu

Generalization of a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) is based on similarities in taste qualities shared by the aversive substance and another taste substance. CTA experiments with rats have found that an aversion to a variety of sweet stimuli will cross-generalize with monosodium glutamate (MSG) when amiloride, a sodium channel blocker, is added to all solutions to reduce the taste of sodium. These findings suggest that the glutamate anion elicits a sweet taste sensation in rats. CTA experiments, however, generally do not indicate whether two substances have different taste qualities. In this study, discrimination methods in which rats focused on perceptual differences were used to determine if they could distinguish between the tastes of MSG and four sweet substances. As expected, rats readily discriminated between two natural sugars (sucrose, glucose) and two artificial sweeteners (saccharin, SC45647). Rats also easily discriminated between MSG and glucose, saccharin and, to a lesser extent, SC45647 when the taste of the sodium ion of MSG was reduced by the addition of amiloride to all solutions, or the addition of amiloride to all solutions and NaCl to each sweet stimulus to match the concentration of Na+ in the MSG solutions. In contrast, reducing the cue function of the Na+ ion significantly decreased their ability to discriminate between sucrose and MSG. These results suggest that the sweet qualities of glutamate taste is not as dominate a component of glutamate taste as CTA experiments suggest and these qualities are most closely related to the taste qualities of sucrose. The findings of this study, in conjunction with other research, suggest that sweet and umami afferent signaling may converge through a taste receptor with a high affinity for glutamate and sucrose or a downstream transduction mechanism. These data also suggest that rats do not necessarily perceive the tastes of these sweet stimuli as similar and that these sweet stimuli are detected by multiple sweet receptors.

Key words: glucose, MSG, saccharin, SC45647, SC45647 threshold, sucrose


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
N. K. Dess, C. D. Chapman, and D. Monroe
Consumption of SC45647 and Sucralose by Rats Selectively Bred for High and Low Saccharin Intake
Chem Senses, March 1, 2009; 34(3): 211 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. M. Breza, K. S. Curtis, and R. J. Contreras
Monosodium Glutamate but not Linoleic Acid Differentially Activates Gustatory Neurons in the Rat Geniculate Ganglion
Chem Senses, November 1, 2007; 32(9): 833 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. D. Dotson and A. C. Spector
Behavioral Discrimination between Sucrose and Other Natural Sweeteners in Mice: Implications for the Neural Coding of T1R Ligands
J. Neurosci., October 17, 2007; 27(42): 11242 - 11253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
L. M. Stone, J. Barrows, T. E. Finger, and S. C. Kinnamon
Expression of T1Rs and Gustducin in Palatal Taste Buds of Mice
Chem Senses, March 1, 2007; 32(3): 255 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. Wifall, T. Faes, C. Taylor-Burds, J. Mitzelfelt, and E. Delay
An Analysis of 5'-Inosine and 5'-Guanosine Monophosphate Taste in Rats
Chem Senses, February 1, 2007; 32(2): 161 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. H. Lemon and D. V. Smith
Influence of response variability on the coding performance of central gustatory neurons.
J. Neurosci., July 12, 2006; 26(28): 7433 - 7443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E.R. Delay, N.P. Hernandez, K. Bromley, and R.F. Margolskee
Sucrose and Monosodium Glutamate Taste Thresholds and Discrimination Ability of T1R3 Knockout Mice
Chem Senses, May 1, 2006; 31(4): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
C. C. Taylor-Burds, A. M. Westburg, T. C. Wifall, and E. R. Delay
Behavioral Comparisons of the Tastes of L-Alanine and Monosodium Glutamate in Rats
Chem Senses, November 1, 2004; 29(9): 807 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.