Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on March 1, 2005
Chemical Senses 2005 30(3):185-194; doi:10.1093/chemse/bji014
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metallic Taste from Electrical and Chemical Stimulation
1 Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA, 2 Hiatt School of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA and 3 Department of Chemistry, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 13323, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Harry Lawless, Department of Food Science, Stocking Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. E-mail: htl1{at}cornell.edu
A series of three experiments investigated the nature of metallic taste reports after stimulation with solutions of metal salts and after stimulation with metals and electric currents. To stimulate with electricity, a device was fabricated consisting of a small battery affixed to a plastic handle with the anode side exposed for placement on the tongue or oral tissues. Intensity of taste from metals and batteries was dependent upon the voltage and was more robust in areas dense in fungiform papillae. Metallic taste was reported from stimulation with ferrous sulfate solutions, from metals and from electric stimuli. However, reports of metallic taste were more frequent when the word ‘metallic’ was presented embedded in a list of choices, as opposed to simple free-choice labeling. Intensity decreased for ferrous sulfate when the nose was occluded, consistent with a decrease in retronasal smell, as previously reported. Intensity of taste evoked by copper metal, bimetallic stimuli (zinc/copper) or small batteries (1.5–3 V) was not affected by nasal occlusion. This difference suggests two distinct mechanisms for evocation of metallic taste reports, one dependent upon retronasal smell and a second mediated by oral chemoreceptors.
Key words: electric taste, electrogustometry, ferrous sulfate, metallic taste
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. E. Riera, H. Vogel, S. A. Simon, S. Damak, and J. le Coutre Sensory Attributes of Complex Tasting Divalent Salts Are Mediated by TRPM5 and TRPV1 Channels J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2654 - 2662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Stevens, D. Baker, E. Cutroni, A. Frey, D. Pugh, and H. T. Lawless A Direct Comparison of the Taste of Electrical and Chemical Stimuli Chem Senses, June 1, 2008; 33(5): 405 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Cuppett, S. E. Duncan, and A. M. Dietrich Evaluation of Copper Speciation and Water Quality Factors That Affect Aqueous Copper Tasting Response Chem Senses, September 1, 2006; 31(7): 689 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Lim and H. T. Lawless Qualitative Differences of Divalent Salts: Multidimensional Scaling and Cluster Analysis Chem Senses, November 1, 2005; 30(9): 719 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|