Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on April 13, 2005
Chemical Senses 2005 30(5):393-400; doi:10.1093/chemse/bji034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/5/393    most recent
bji034v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chee, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hamdy, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chee, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hamdy, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

The Influence of Chemical Gustatory Stimuli and Oral Anaesthesia on Healthy Human Pharyngeal Swallowing

Carolyn Chee1, Shoaib Arshad1, Salil Singh2, Satish Mistry2 and Shaheen Hamdy2

1 Manchester Medical School, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK and 2 Department of GI Sciences, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD, UK

Correspondence to be sent to: Dr Shaheen Hamdy, Lecturer in GI Science, Clinical Sciences Building, Hope Hospital, Eccles Old Road, Salford M6 8HD, UK. e-mail: shaheen.hamdy{at}manchester.ac.uk

This study explored the effects of taste and oral anaesthesia on human sequential swallowing. Subjects were healthy adults (n = 42, mean age 28 years, 21 females), investigated by means of a water swallow test. Taste stimuli comprised quinine, glucose, citrus and saline solutions compared with neutral water. Oral anaesthesia comprised topical lidocaine at doses of 10, 20 and 40 mg and compared with placebo. Data were collected on swallowing speed (volume per second), inter-swallow interval and swallowing capacity (volume per swallow). Compared with water, glucose, citrus and saline reduced swallowing speed (10.94 ± 0.89 versus 9.56 ± 0.79, 9.33 ± 1.19, 9.37 ± 0.92 ml/s respectively, P < 0.05). Inter-swallow interval was increased only by quinine and saline (1.47 ± 1.11 versus 2.13 ± 0.34 and 1.92 ± 0.31 s, P < 0.04). Swallowing capacity was only marginally increased by quinine (P = 0.0759). Compared with the placebo, only 40 mg of lidocaine altered swallowing, immediately reducing the swallowing speed (7.89 ± 2.34 versus 10.11 ± 3.26 ml/s, P < 0.05) and increasing inter-swallow interval (1.67 ± 0.38 versus 1.45 ± 0.29 s, P < 0.01) without affecting capacity. By 15 min all measures except sensory thresholds had returned to baseline values. Thus, swallowing function is highly influenced by chemosensory input, providing insight into how oral sensation regulates pharyngeal swallowing.

Key words: anaesthesia, deglutition, gustatory, sensation, taste, water swallow test


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
L. Leow, M-L Huckabee, S Sharma, and T. Tooley
The Influence of Taste on Swallowing Apnea, Oral Preparation Time, and Duration and Amplitude of Submental Muscle Contraction
Chem Senses, February 1, 2007; 32(2): 119 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
S. Mistry, J. C. Rothwell, D. G. Thompson, and S. Hamdy
Modulation of human cortical swallowing motor pathways after pleasant and aversive taste stimuli
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): G666 - G671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.