Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on December 14, 2005
Chemical Senses 2006 31(2):107-118; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjj008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/2/107    most recent
bjj008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scherer, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, K.
Right arrow Articles by Scherer, P. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Numerical Modeling of Turbulent and Laminar Airflow and Odorant Transport during Sniffing in the Human and Rat Nose

Kai Zhao1,2, Pamela Dalton1, Geoffery C. Yang2,3 and Peter W. Scherer1,2

1 Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, 2 Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, RM 120, Hayden Hall, 3320 Smith Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA and 3 Affymetrix, Inc., 3380 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Peter W. Scherer, Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, RM 120, Hayden Hall, 3320 Smith Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. e-mail: scherer{at}seas.upenn.edu

Human sniffing behavior usually involves bouts of short, high flow rate inhalation (>300 ml/s through each nostril) with mostly turbulent airflow. This has often been characterized as a factor enabling higher amounts of odorant to deposit onto olfactory mucosa than for laminar airflow and thereby aid in olfactory detection. Using computational fluid dynamics human nasal cavity models, however, we found essentially no difference in predicted olfactory odorant flux (g/cm2 s) for turbulent versus laminar flow for total nasal flow rates between 300 and 1000 ml/s and for odorants of quite different mucosal solubility. This lack of difference was shown to be due to the much higher resistance to lateral odorant mass transport in the mucosal nasal airway wall than in the air phase. The simulation also revealed that the increase in airflow rate during sniffing can increase odorant uptake flux to the nasal/olfactory mucosa but lower the cumulative total uptake in the olfactory region when the inspired air/odorant volume was held fixed, which is consistent with the observation that sniff duration may be more important than sniff strength for optimizing olfactory detection. In contrast, in rats, sniffing involves high-frequency bouts of both inhalation and exhalation with laminar airflow. In rat nose odorant uptake simulations, it was observed that odorant deposition was highly dependent on solubility and correlated with the locations of different types of receptors.

Key words: laminar nasal airflow, odorant uptake modeling during sniff, olfactory odorant uptake, turbulent nasal airflow


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J R Soc InterfaceHome page
B. A. Craven, E. G. Paterson, and G. S. Settles
The fluid dynamics of canine olfaction: unique nasal airflow patterns as an explanation of macrosmia
J R Soc Interface, December 9, 2009; (2009) rsif.2009.0490v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Lapid, H.-S. Seo, B. Schuster, E. Schneidman, Y. Roth, D. Harel, N. Sobel, and T. Hummel
Odorant Concentration Dependence in Electroolfactograms Recorded From the Human Olfactory Epithelium
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2121 - 2130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
S. Ishikawa, T. Nakayama, M. Watanabe, and T. Matsuzawa
Flow Mechanisms in the Human Olfactory Groove: Numerical Simulation of Nasal Physiological Respiration During Inspiration, Expiration, and Sniffing
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, February 1, 2009; 135(2): 156 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
V. Chen and B. P. Halpern
Retronasal but Not Oral-Cavity-Only Identification of "Purely Olfactory" Odorants
Chem Senses, February 1, 2008; 33(2): 107 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Scott, H. P. Acevedo, L. Sherrill, and M. Phan
Responses of the Rat Olfactory Epithelium to Retronasal Air Flow
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 1941 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
G. C. Yang, P. W. Scherer, and M. M. Mozell
Modeling Inspiratory and Expiratory Steady-State Velocity Fields in the Sprague-Dawley Rat Nasal Cavity
Chem Senses, March 1, 2007; 32(3): 215 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
G. C. Yang, P. W. Scherer, K. Zhao, and M. M. Mozell
Numerical Modeling of Odorant Uptake in the Rat Nasal Cavity
Chem Senses, March 1, 2007; 32(3): 273 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
B. N. Johnson, C. Russell, R. M. Khan, and N. Sobel
A Comparison of Methods for Sniff Measurement Concurrent with Olfactory Tasks in Humans
Chem Senses, November 1, 2006; 31(9): 795 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. W. Scott, H. P. Acevedo, and L. Sherrill
Effects of Concentration and Sniff Flow Rate on the Rat Electroolfactogram
Chem Senses, July 1, 2006; 31(6): 581 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.