Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on December 14, 2005
Chemical Senses 2006 31(2):119-130; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjj013
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sniffing and Spatiotemporal Coding in Olfaction
Department of Cell Biology, Emory University, 405N Whitehead Biomedical Research Center, 615 Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: John W. Scott, Department of Cell Biology, Emory University, 405N Whitehead Biomedical Research Center, 615 Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. e-mail: johns{at}cellbio.emory.edu
The act of sniffing increases the air velocity and changes the duration of airflow in the nose. It is not yet clear how these changes interact with the intrinsic timing within the olfactory bulb, but this is a matter of current research activity. An action of sniffing in generating a high velocity that alters the sorption of odorants onto the lining of the nasal cavity is expected from the established work on odorant properties and sorption in the frog nose. Recent work indicates that the receptor properties in the olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb are correlated with the receptor gene expression zones. The responses in both the epithelium and the olfactory bulb are predictable to a considerable extent by the hydrophobicity of odorants. Furthermore, receptor expression in both rodent and salamander nose interacts with the shapes of the nasal cavity to place the receptor sensitivity to odorants in optimal places according to the aerodynamic properties of the nose.
Key words: electroolfactogram, flow rate, odorant hydrophobicity, sorption
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Cheung, R. M. Carey, and M. Wachowiak A Method for Generating Natural and User-Defined Sniffing Patterns in Anesthetized or Reduced Preparations Chem Senses, January 1, 2009; 34(1): 63 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Griff, M. Mafhouz, and M. A. Chaput Comparison of Identified Mitral and Tufted Cells in Freely Breathing Rats: II. Odor-Evoked Responses Chem Senses, November 1, 2008; 33(9): 793 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Wesson, T. N. Donahou, M. O. Johnson, and M. Wachowiak Sniffing Behavior of Mice during Performance in Odor-Guided Tasks Chem Senses, September 1, 2008; 33(7): 581 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Nawroth, C. A. Greer, W. R. Chen, S. B. Laughlin, and G. M. Shepherd An Energy Budget for the Olfactory Glomerulus J. Neurosci., September 5, 2007; 27(36): 9790 - 9800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Scott, H. P. Acevedo, L. Sherrill, and M. Phan Responses of the Rat Olfactory Epithelium to Retronasal Air Flow J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 1941 - 1950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Scott, H. P. Acevedo, and L. Sherrill Effects of Concentration and Sniff Flow Rate on the Rat Electroolfactogram Chem Senses, July 1, 2006; 31(6): 581 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


