Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on March 9, 2006
Chemical Senses 2006 31(5):403-413; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjj044
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heritability and Genetic Covariation of Sensitivity to PROP, SOA, Quinine HCl, and Caffeine
1 Genetic Epidemiology Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia, 2 School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia and 3 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Jonathan Hansen, Genetic Epidemiology Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia. e-mail: Jonathan.Hansen{at}qimr.edu.au
The perceived bitterness intensity for bitter solutions of propylthiouracil (PROP), sucrose octa-acetate (SOA), quinine HCl and caffeine were examined in a genetically informative sample of 392 females and 313 males (mean age of 17.8 ± 3.1 years), including 62 monozygotic and 131 dizygotic twin pairs and 237 sib pairs. Broad-sense heritabilities were estimated at 0.72, 0.28, 0.34, and 0.30 for PROP, SOA, quinine, and caffeine, respectively, for perceived intensity measures. Modeling showed 1) a group factor which explained a large amount of the genetic variation in SOA, quinine, and caffeine (2228% phenotypic variation), 2) a factor responsible for all the genetic variation in PROP (72% phenotypic variation), which only accounted for 1% and 2% of the phenotypic variation in SOA and caffeine, respectively, and 3) a modest specific genetic factor for quinine (12% phenotypic variation). Unique environmental influences for all four compounds were due to a single factor responsible for 722% of phenotypic variation. The results suggest that the perception of PROP and the perception of SOA, quinine, and caffeine are influenced by two distinct sets of genes.
Key words: bitter taste, propylthiouracil, quinine hydrochloride, sucrose octa-acetate, twin
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.-F. Wang, L. E. Marks, and M. E. Frank Taste Coding after Selective Inhibition by Chlorhexidine Chem Senses, October 1, 2009; 34(8): 653 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cicerale, P. A.S. Breslin, G. K. Beauchamp, and R. S.J. Keast Sensory Characterization of the Irritant Properties of Oleocanthal, a Natural Anti-Inflammatory Agent in Extra Virgin Olive Oils Chem Senses, May 1, 2009; 34(4): 333 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Keskitalo, H. Tuorila, T. D Spector, L. F Cherkas, A. Knaapila, K. Silventoinen, and M. Perola Same genetic components underlie different measures of sweet taste preference Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2007; 86(6): 1663 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. White, L. V. Dishaw, P. R. Sheehe, and S. L. Youngentob The Relationship between PROP and Ethanol Preferences: An Evaluation of 4 Inbred Mouse Strains Chem Senses, November 1, 2007; 32(9): 847 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Wise, J. L. Hansen, D. R. Reed, and P. A.S. Breslin Twin Study of the Heritability of Recognition Thresholds for Sour and Salty Taste Chem Senses, October 1, 2007; 32(8): 749 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Keskitalo, A. Knaapila, M. Kallela, A. Palotie, M. Wessman, S. Sammalisto, L. Peltonen, H. Tuorila, and M. Perola Sweet taste preferences are partly genetically determined: identification of a trait locus on chromosome 16 Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2007; 86(1): 55 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S.J. Keast and J. Roper A Complex Relationship among Chemical Concentration, Detection Threshold, and Suprathreshold Intensity of Bitter Compounds Chem Senses, March 1, 2007; 32(3): 245 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

