Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on July 13, 2006
Chemical Senses 2006 31(7):689-697; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl010
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evaluation of Copper Speciation and Water Quality Factors That Affect Aqueous Copper Tasting Response
1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0246, USA 2 Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0418, USA
Correspondence to be sent to: Andrea M. Dietrich, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0246, USA. e-mail: andread{at}vt.edu
This study determined taste thresholds for copper as its speciation was varied among free cupric ion, complexed cupric ion, and precipitated cupric particles. The impact of copper chemistry on taste is important as copper is added to many beverages and can be present in drinking water as a natural mineral or due to corrosion of copper plumbing. A one-of-five test was used to define thresholds with solutions containing 0.0258 mg/l Cu (from copper sulfate) in distilled or mineralized water of varying pH. The mineralized water was designed to mimic the composition of a typical tap water. Group thresholds for copper in either distilleddeionized water or mineralized water were not significantly different and ranged from 0.4 to 0.8 mg/l Cu. A difference from control test was used to assess the impact of soluble and particulate copper on taste. Soluble copper species, including free cupric ion and complexed copper species, were readily tasted, while particulate copper was poorly tasted.
Key words: copper, speciation, taste, threshold, water