Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on August 10, 2006
Chemical Senses 2006 31(9):785-793; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/9/785    most recent
bjl020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manita, S.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manita, S.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Is Glycine "Sweet" to Mice? Mouse Strain Differences in Perception of Glycine Taste

Satoshi Manita1, Alexander A. Bachmanov2, Xia Li2, Gary K. Beauchamp2,3 and Masashi Inoue1,2

1 Laboratory of Cellular Neurobiology, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Science, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392, Japan 2 Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 3 Department of Psychology and School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Masashi Inoue, Laboratory of Cellular Neurobiology, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Science, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392, Japan. e-mail: inou{at}ls.toyaku.ac.jp

Glycine is an amino acid tasting sweet to humans. In 2-bottle tests, C57BL/6ByJ (B6) mice strongly prefer glycine solutions, whereas 129P3/J (129) mice do not, suggesting that they differ in perception of glycine taste. We examined this question using the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) generalization technique. CTA was achieved by injecting LiCl after drinking glycine, and next its generalization to 10 taste solutions (glycine, sucrose, saccharin, D-tryptophan, L-tryptophan, L-alanine, L-proline, L-glutamine, NaCl, and HCl) was examined by video recording licking behavior. Both B6 and 129 mice generalized the aversion to sucrose, saccharin, L-alanine, and L-proline and did not generalize it to NaCl, HCl, and L-tryptophan. This indicates that both B6 and 129 mice perceive the sweetness (i.e., a sucrose-like taste) of glycine. Thus, the lack of a glycine preference by 129 mice cannot be explained by their inability to perceive its sweetness. Strain differences were observed for CTA generalization to 2 amino acids: 129 mice generalized aversion to L-glutamine but not D-tryptophan, whereas B6 mice generalized it to D-tryptophan but not L-glutamine. 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice with 2 genotypes of the Tas1r3 locus (B6/129 heterozygotes and 129/129 homozygotes) did not differ in aversion generalization, suggesting that the differences between 129 and B6 strains are not attributed to the Tas1r3 allelic variants and that other, yet unknown, genes are involved in taste perception of amino acids.

Key words: amino acid, D-tryptophan, L-glutamine, Sac locus, sweet taste, Tas1r3 gene


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E. Jiang, G. Blonde, M. Garcea, and A. C. Spector
Greater Superficial Petrosal Nerve Transection in Rats does not Change Unconditioned Licking Responses to Putatively Sweet Taste Stimuli
Chem Senses, October 1, 2008; 33(8): 709 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Hacker, A. Laskowski, L. Feng, D. Restrepo, and K. Medler
Evidence for Two Populations of Bitter Responsive Taste Cells in Mice
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1503 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
H. Ji and A. A. Bachmanov
Differences in postingestive metabolism of glutamate and glycine between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice
Physiol Genomics, November 14, 2007; 31(3): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. A. McCaughey
Taste-Evoked Responses to Sweeteners in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J Mice
J. Neurosci., January 3, 2007; 27(1): 35 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.