Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on December 6, 2006
Chemical Senses 2007 32(2):173-181; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl046
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/2/173    most recent
bjl046v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slotnick, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slotnick, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Olfactory Performance of Rats after Selective Deafferentation of the Olfactory Bulb by 3-Methyl Indole

Burton Slotnick

Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Burton Slotnick, Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA. e-mail: slotnic{at}american.edu


  Abstract

Rats trained to detect propyl acetate and valeric acid and to discriminate between propyl acetate and amyl acetate and between valeric acid and butyric acid were injected with a low dose of 3-methyl indole, a treatment that produces well-defined and selective deafferentation of the olfactory bulbs. Treatment completely deafferented most but not all bulbar loci for aliphatic acids and at least disrupted those for propyl and amyl acetate. In posttreatment tests, experimental rats performed somewhat but not significantly more poorly than controls and about as well on the acid detection and discrimination tasks as on the corresponding acetate tests.

Key words: axonal transport, glomerular deafferentation, 3-methyl indole, odor detection, olfactory bulb, odor discrimination


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Chem SensesHome page
S. Zukerman, K. Touzani, R. F. Margolskee, and A. Sclafani
Role of Olfaction in the Conditioned Sucrose Preference of Sweet-Ageusic T1R3 Knockout Mice
Chem Senses, October 1, 2009; 34(8): 685 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. W. Wesson, J. V. Verhagen, and M. Wachowiak
Why Sniff Fast? The Relationship Between Sniff Frequency, Odor Discrimination, and Receptor Neuron Activation in the Rat
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 1089 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Chem SensesHome page
B. Slotnick
Response Accuracy and Odor Sampling Time in Mice Trained to Discriminate between Enantiomers of Carvone and Those of Terpinen-4-ol
Chem Senses, September 1, 2007; 32(7): 721 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.