Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on January 6, 2007
Chemical Senses 2007 32(3):237-244; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl051
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/3/237    most recent
bjl051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bensafi, M
Right arrow Articles by Rouby, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bensafi, M
Right arrow Articles by Rouby, C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Individual Differences in Odor Imaging Ability Reflect Differences in Olfactory and Emotional Perception

M Bensafi1,2 and C Rouby1,2,3

1 Laboratoire de Neurosciences et Systèmes Sensoriels, UMR 5020 CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 50 avenue Tony Garnier, 69366 Lyon cedex 07, France, 2 Institut Fédératif des Neurosciences de Lyon, Bât B13 Groupement Hospitalier Est 59, boulevard Pinel 69677 BRON cedex, France and 3 UMR FLAVIC, Flaveur, Vision et Comportement du consommateur, Centre INRA de Dijon, 17 rue Sully, BP86510, 21065 Dijon cedex, France

Correspondence to be sent to: M. Bensafi, Laboratoire de Neurosciences et Systèmes Sensoriels, UMR 5020 CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 50 avenue Tony Garnier, 69366 Lyon cedex 07, France. e-mail: bensafi{at}olfac.univ-lyon1.fr


   Abstract

We asked whether the large variability in odor imaging ability is underlain by interindividual differences in the processing of smells and emotion. Olfactory imaging ability, anhedonia level, and odor perception were measured in 40 subjects, using the Vividness of Olfactory Imagery Questionnaire (VOIQ), the Physical Anhedonia Scale, and the European Test of Olfactory Capabilities. "Good" olfactory imagers, defined primarily on the basis of the VOIQ, rated pleasant smells as more familiar and had lower anhedonia scores than "bad" olfactory imagers. Based on self-reported measures, these results suggest that, like olfactory perception, the mental imagery of smells is related to emotion and that, beyond their differences in vividness, good and bad olfactory imagers differ in their experience of emotion and long-term memory of smells.

Key words: anhedonia, emotion, individual differences, mental imagery, olfaction

Accepted 7 December 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
A.M. Kleemann, R. Kopietz, J. Albrecht, V. Schopf, O. Pollatos, T. Schreder, J. May, J. Linn, H. Bruckmann, and M. Wiesmann
Investigation of Breathing Parameters during Odor Perception and Olfactory Imagery
Chem Senses, January 1, 2009; 34(1): 1 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Transcultural PsychiatryHome page
D. E. Hinton, D. Howes, and L. J. Kirmayer
Toward a Medical Anthropology of Sensations: Definitions and Research Agenda
Transcultural Psychiatry, June 1, 2008; 45(2): 142 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Bensafi, N. Sobel, and R. M. Khan
Hedonic-Specific Activity in Piriform Cortex During Odor Imagery Mimics That During Odor Perception
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3254 - 3262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.