Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on January 13, 2007
Chemical Senses 2007 32(3):245-253; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjl052
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Complex Relationship among Chemical Concentration, Detection Threshold, and Suprathreshold Intensity of Bitter Compounds
1 School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia 2 RMIT University, PVC Science Engineering & Technology Applied Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001, Australia
Correspondence to be sent to: Russell S.J. Keast, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. e-mail: russell.keast{at}deakin.edu.au
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Detection thresholds and psychophysical curves were established for caffeine, quinine-HCl (QHCl), and propylthiouracil (PROP) in a sample of 33 subjects (28 female mean age 24 ± 4). The mean detection threshold (±standard error) for caffeine, QHCl, and PROP was 1.2 ± 0.12, 0.0083 ± 0.001, and 0.088 ± 0.07 mM, respectively. Pearson product–moment analysis revealed no significant correlations between detection thresholds of the compounds. Psychophysical curves were constructed for each bitter compound over 6 concentrations. There were significant correlations between incremental points of the individual psychophysical curves for QHCl and PROP. Regarding caffeine, there was a specific concentration (6 mM) below and above which the incremental steps in bitterness were correlated. Between compounds, analysis of psychophysical curves revealed no correlations with PROP, but there were significant correlations between the bitterness of caffeine and QHCl at higher concentrations on the psychophysical curve (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis of detection threshold and suprathreshold intensity within a compound revealed a significant correlation between PROP threshold and suprathreshold intensity (r = 0.46–0.4, P < 0.05), a significant negative correlation for QHCl (r = –0.33 to –0.4, P < 0.05), and no correlation for caffeine. The results suggest a complex relationship between chemical concentration, detection threshold, and suprathreshold intensity.
Key words: bitter taste, caffeine, individual differences, propylthiouracil, threshold
Accepted 8 December 2006
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. Kaji, S.-i. Karaki, Y. Fukami, M. Terasaki, and A. Kuwahara Secretory effects of a luminal bitter tastant and expressions of bitter taste receptors, T2Rs, in the human and rat large intestine Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): G971 - G981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F.-l. Zhao and S. Herness Resynthesis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate mediates adaptation of the caffeine response in rat taste receptor cells J. Physiol., January 15, 2009; 587(2): 363 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Lim, L. Urban, and B. G. Green Measures of Individual Differences in Taste and Creaminess Perception Chem Senses, July 1, 2008; 33(6): 493 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Talavera, K. Yasumatsu, R. Yoshida, R. F. Margolskee, T. Voets, Y. Ninomiya, and B. Nilius The taste transduction channel TRPM5 is a locus for bitter-sweet taste interactions FASEB J, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1343 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|