Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on March 14, 2007
Chemical Senses 2007 32(5):423-431; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/5/423    most recent
bjm007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chalé-Rush, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mattes, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chalé-Rush, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mattes, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Evidence for Human Orosensory (Taste?) Sensitivity to Free Fatty Acids

Angela Chalé-Rush, John R. Burgess and Richard D. Mattes

Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, 700 West State Street, Lafayette, IN 47907-1264, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Richard D. Mattes, Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, 700 West State Street, Lafayette, IN 47907-1264, USA. e-mail: mattes{at}purdue.edu


   Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests dietary fatty acids (FAs) may be sensed in the oral cavity. However, the effective cues have not been characterized. In particular, influences from other sensory cues have hampered identification of an independent gustatory contribution. Experiment 1 examined techniques to minimize the formation of FA oxidation products and improve the homogeneity of water/lipid emulsions to be used as stimuli in Experiment 2, a psychophysical study to determine FA detection thresholds in humans. Through sonication of chilled samples held in polypropylene labware and the addition of 0.01% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, calcium disodium salt, homogenous emulsions of unoxidized linoleic and oleic FAs were obtained. Spectrophotometric analysis revealed no oxidation product formation over a 24-h period. Coupled with these techniques, a masking approach was used to minimize other sensory cues imparted from linoleic, oleic, and stearic FAs. Concentration ranges from 0.00028% to 5% (w/v) were prepared in mixtures with 5% mineral oil (w/v) and 5% gum acacia (w/v) to mask lubricity and viscosity effects, respectively. Testing was conducted under red light with nares blocked to eliminate visual and olfactory cues. Oral rinses with 20 ppm capsaicin were administered to desensitize participants to selected irritation effects prior to remeasuring linoleic acid detection thresholds. To determine if the effective stimulus was an oxidation product, oxidized linoleic acid was included among the test stimuli. Detection thresholds were obtained using a 3-alternative, forced-choice ascending-concentration presentation procedure. The mean detection threshold for linoleic acid pre-desensitization was 0.034 ± 0.008%, for linoleic acid post-desensitization was 0.032 ± 0.007%, for oleic 0.022 ± 0.003%, for stearic 0.032 ± 0.005%, and oxidized linoleic 0.025 ± 0.005%. The results suggest that linoleic, oleic, stearic, and oxidized linoleic acids are detectable in the oral cavity of humans with minimal input from the olfactory, capsaicin, and viscosity-assessing tactile systems.

Key words: detection thresholds, free fatty acids, human, orosensory, taste

Accepted 5 February 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
D. W. Pittman, K. R. Smith, M. E. Crawley, C. H. Corbin, D. R. Hansen, K. J. Watson, and T. A. Gilbertson
Orosensory Detection of Fatty Acids by Obesity-Prone and Obesity-Resistant Rats: Strain and Sex Differences
Chem Senses, June 1, 2008; 33(5): 449 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
D. Gaillard, F. Laugerette, N. Darcel, A. El-Yassimi, P. Passilly-Degrace, A. Hichami, N. A. Khan, J.-P. Montmayeur, and P. Besnard
The gustatory pathway is involved in CD36-mediated orosensory perception of long-chain fatty acids in the mouse
FASEB J, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1458 - 1468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. Sclafani, K. Ackroff, and N. A. Abumrad
CD36 gene deletion reduces fat preference and intake but not post-oral fat conditioning in mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): R1823 - R1832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. Sclafani, S. Zukerman, J. I. Glendinning, and R. F. Margolskee
Fat and carbohydrate preferences in mice: the contribution of {alpha}-gustducin and Trpm5 taste-signaling proteins
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): R1504 - R1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.