Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on May 7, 2007
Chemical Senses 2007 32(5):475-482; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/5/475    most recent
bjm016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wise, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Preti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wise, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Preti, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Human Odor Detection of Homologous Carboxylic Acids and Their Binary Mixtures

Paul M. Wise1, Toshio Miyazawa2, Michelle Gallagher1 and George Preti1,3

1 Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA 2 R&D Control Division, Flavor System & Technology Laboratory, Ogawa & Co., Ltd,15-7 Chidori Urayashu-shi, Chiba 279-0032, Japan 3 Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104

Correspondence to be sent to: Paul M. Wise, Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA. e-mail: pwise{at}monell.org


   Abstract

Does structural similarity of odorants influence detectability of their mixtures? To address this question, psychometric (probability of correct detection vs. concentration) functions were measured for aliphatic carboxylic acids and selected binary mixtures thereof. Unmixed stimuli included acetic (C2), butyric (C4), hexanoic (C6), and octanoic (C8) acids. Mixtures included C2 + C4, C2 + C6, and C2 + C8. Vapor-phase concentrations of individual compounds, as measured by a combination of solid-phase micro extraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, were always the same, whether presented singly or in a binary mixture. Additivity of detectability was assessed with respect to response addition (independent processing of mixture components). For C2 + C6, for which the mixture components differed by 4 methylene units, and C2 + C8, which differed by 6 methylene units, response addition provided a reasonably good description of detection at all levels of performance. In contrast, for C2 + C4, which differed by only 2 methylene units, detection showed a tendency to exceed additivity at low concentrations but fell below additivity at higher concentrations. These results suggest that interaction among odors in binary mixtures does depend on structural similarity, at least for detection of carboxylic acids. Future studies can determine if this result is particular to carboxylic acids.

Key words: interaction, olfaction, psychophysics, sensitivity, structure–activity

Accepted 6 March 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. Miyazawa, M. Gallagher, G. Preti, and P. M. Wise
Synergistic Mixture Interactions in Detection of Perithreshold Odors by Humans
Chem Senses, April 1, 2008; 33(4): 363 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Koulakov, A. Gelperin, and D. Rinberg
Olfactory Coding With All-or-Nothing Glomeruli
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3134 - 3142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.