Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on October 24, 2007
Chemical Senses 2008 33(2):107-118; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm069
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/2/107    most recent
bjm069v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, V.
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, V.
Right arrow Articles by Halpern, B. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Retronasal but Not Oral-Cavity-Only Identification of "Purely Olfactory" Odorants

Veronica Chen1,3 and Bruce P. Halpern1,2

1 Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 2 Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 3 Present address: 2023 Foothill Drive, Fullerton, CA 92833, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Bruce P. Halpern, Departments of Psychology and Neurobiology and Behavior, Uris Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-7601, USA. e-mail: bph1{at}cornell.edu


  Abstract

Identifications of 5 odorants selected to be nontrigeminal stimuli were compared using retronasal and oral-cavity-only (OCO) air-phase presentations, with OCO produced by both exhalation through the mouth and a nose clip that closed the nostrils. Nine identifiers were available on each trial; 1 or 2 were correct for each odorant. Correct retronasal identifications were more common than OCO identifications and exceeded chance across subjects and for each subject; OCO correct identifications did not exceed chance. Retronasal reaction times were briefer than OCO reaction times. Correct retronasal identifications for vanillin, octanoic acid, phenylethyl alcohol, coumarin, and octane were 88%, 73%, 87%, 70%, and 85%, respectively; correct OCO identifications were, respectively, 10%, 12%, 18%, 35%, and 33%. Identifiers selected for retronasally presented odorants differed from those for other retronasally presented odorants, but identifiers for OCO-presented odorants did not differ between odorants. Overall, the retronasal identifications of nontrigeminal odorants both depended upon the odorant that was presented and corresponded to previous reported orthonasal identifications. In contrast, the OCO identifications, characterized by low percentages of correct identifications and an absence of differences between odorants in selected identifiers, suggested that OCO responses to nontrigeminal, purely olfactory odorants lack sufficient sensory information for either correct or differential identification.

Key words: human psychophysics, olfaction, oral cavity, smell, trigeminal

Accepted 19 September 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.