Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on November 29, 2007
Chemical Senses 2008 33(2):173-179; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm078
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/2/173    most recent
bjm078v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Experience-Induced Changes in Sugar Taste Discrimination

Kristina M. Gonzalez1,2, Catherine Peo1,3, Todd Livdahl2 and Linda M. Kennedy1,2

1 Neuroscience Laboratory 2 Lasry Center for Bioscience, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610-1477, USA 3 Neuroscience Program, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Kristina M. Gonzalez, Clark University, Lasry Center for Bioscience, 950 Main Street, Worcester, MA 01610-1477, USA. e-mail: kgonzalez{at}clarku.edu


   Abstract

An apparent plasticity in glucose sensitivity was first noted while studying human taste variants, but the experimental design did not rule out regression to the mean. Since then, a human taste induction hypothesis that sensitivity for a taste stimulus increases with repeated exposure to it has been supported first by experience-induced changes in taste identification of monosodium glutamate and, subsequently, in sensory detection of glutaraldehyde, as well as in psychophysical and functional magnetic resonance imaging responses to novel taste stimuli. Yet, whether such plasticity occurs for the highly familiar taste of sugar remained unconfirmed. Therefore, we tested the taste induction hypothesis for sugar using a counterbalanced design, consisting of 3 pretreatment and 2 treatment conditions. The effects over time also were followed with an additional group of participants. The results showed that 1) experience with fructose significantly increases sensitivity for the taste of a sugar, glucose; 2) there are no significant differences in the sugar sensitivity between groups of randomly assigned participants before treatments; 3) a single session of 5 brief tastings of glucose has an effect on glucose sensitivity when tested 11 or 12 days later; and 4) without continued treatment, the increased sensitivity reverses within 33 or 34 days.

Key words: human psychophysics, plasticity, sugar, taste

Accepted 17 October 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. L. Youngentob and J. I. Glendinning
From the Cover: Fetal ethanol exposure increases ethanol intake by making it smell and taste better
PNAS, March 31, 2009; 106(13): 5359 - 5364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.