Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on December 10, 2007
Chemical Senses 2008 33(2):193-199; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm080
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/2/193    most recent
bjm080v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Le Berre, E.
Right arrow Articles by Prescott, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Le Berre, E.
Right arrow Articles by Prescott, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Perceptual Processing Strategy and Exposure Influence the Perception of Odor Mixtures

Elodie Le Berre1,2, Thierry Thomas-Danguin1, Noëlle Béno1, Gérard Coureaud3, Patrick Etiévant1 and John Prescott2

1 UMR1129 FLAVIC, ENESAD, INRA, Université de Bourgogne, 17 rue Sully, BP 86510, 21065 Dijon Cedex, France 2 Department of Psychology, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia 3 Centre Européen des Sciences du Goût, UMR5170 CNRS, Université de Bourgogne, INRA, 15 rue Picardet, 21000 Dijon, France

Correspondence to be sent to: John Prescott, Department of Psychology, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4870, Australia. e-mail: john.prescott{at}jcu.edu.au


   Abstract

In flavor perception, both experience with the components of odor/taste mixtures and the cognitive strategy used to examine the interactions between the components influence the overall mixture perception. However, the effect of these factors on odor mixtures perception has never been studied. The present study aimed at evaluating whether 1) previous exposure to the odorants included in a mixture or 2) the synthetic or analytic strategy engaged during odorants mixture evaluation determines odor representation. Blending mixtures, in which subjects perceived a unique quality distinct from those of components, were chosen in order to induce a priori synthetic perception. In the first part, we checked whether the chosen mixtures presented blending properties for our subjects. In the second part, 3 groups of participants were either exposed to the odorants contributing to blending mixtures with a "pineapple" or a "red cordial" odor or nonexposed. In a following task, half of each group was assigned to a synthetic or an analytical task. The synthetic task consisted of rating how typical (i.e., representative) of the target odor name (pineapple or red cordial) were the mixtures and each of their components. The analytical task consisted of evaluating these stimuli on several scales labeled with the target odor name and odor descriptors of the components. Previous exposure to mixture components was found to decrease mixture typicality but only for the pineapple blending mixture. Likewise, subjects engaged in an analytical task rated both blending mixtures as less typical than did subjects engaged in a synthetic task. This study supports a conclusion that odor mixtures can be perceived either analytically or synthetically according to the cognitive strategy engaged.

Key words: blending mixture, odor, perceptual learning, perceptual processing strategy

Accepted 31 October 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.