Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on September 4, 2008
Chemical Senses 2009 34(1):27-35; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjn049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/1/27    most recent
bjn049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glatt, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Boughter, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glatt, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Boughter, J. D., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Variation in Nicotine Consumption in Inbred Mice Is Not Linked to Orosensory Ability

A. Rebecca Glatt, Kelley Denton and John D. Boughter, Jr

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: John D. Boughter Jr, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA. e-mail: jboughter{at}utmem.edu


   Abstract

Genetic studies of nicotine addiction in mice have utilized the oral self-administration model. However, it is unclear if strain differences in nicotine consumption are influenced by variation in bitter taste sensitivity. We measured both nicotine consumption and nicotine brief-access licking behavior in several commonly used inbred strains of mice that were previously shown to differ in nicotine consumption. A/J (A), C57BL/6J (B6), and DBA/2J (D2) mice were given a 2-bottle choice test with a single concentration of nicotine (75 µg/ml; nicotine vs. water). Mice of these strains were also tested with a range of nicotine concentrations (5–400 µg/ml) using a brief-access test, which measures orosensory response and minimizes postingestive effects. Although B6 mice consumed more 75-µg/ml nicotine than A or D2 mice in the 2-bottle test, these strains did not differ in level of aversion to nicotine when tested with the brief-access procedure. Strain differences in orosensory response to nicotine were not found; yet, differences emerged during the 2-bottle tests. This study provides evidence that variation in intake level of nicotine is likely not due to differences in taste or trigeminal sensitivity but likely due to postingestive factors.

Key words: A/J, aversion, C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, inbred, intake, mice, nicotine, orosensory, taste

Accepted 4 August 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.