Skip Navigation


Chemical Senses Advance Access originally published online on July 16, 2009
Chemical Senses 2009 34(7):559-563; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjp036
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/7/559    most recent
bjp036v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gamble, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gamble, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Discrimination of "Odorless" Mineral Oils Alone and as Diluents by Behaviorally Trained Mice

Katherine R. Gamble1 and David W. Smith1,2

1 Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 2 The Center for Smell and Taste, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: David W. Smith, Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. e-mail: dwsmith{at}ufl.edu


   Abstract

Odorant diluents are generally chosen because of their odorless qualities, allowing them to dilute a target odorant without otherwise altering its perception. Unpublished observations from our laboratory, however, suggest that mineral oil (MO), a common diluent for oil-based odorants, may possess a distinct odor when used in the behavioral testing of mice. To test this, mice were trained to discriminate between 4 brands of MO, using a commercial, liquid-dilution olfactometer and a 2-odorant discrimination task. The results demonstrate that mice were able to detect MOs and to discriminate between MO pairs obtained from different sources. Additionally, we sought to determine if mice could discriminate different MOs when used as a diluent for suprathreshold levels of cineole. Mice were required to discriminate between bottles containing identical concentrations of cineole diluted in different brands of MO. The results showed that the mice readily discriminated each cineole/MO pairing. These data demonstrate that mice are able to detect and discriminate MOs obtained from different sources, both when presented alone and in mixtures. The results also indicate that MO is not an odorless diluent and should be used with caution in olfactory experiments, as the perception of odors being diluted may be unintentionally altered.

Key words: odor diluent, odorant, odorant discrimination, odorant mixtures, olfaction, olfactometer

Accepted 3 June 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.