Skip Navigation



Chemical Senses Advance Access published online on June 5, 2008

Chemical Senses, doi:10.1093/chemse/bjn029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/7/581    most recent
bjn029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wesson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wachowiak, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wesson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wachowiak, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Sniffing Behavior of Mice during Performance in Odor-Guided Tasks

Daniel W. Wesson, Tanya N. Donahou, Marc O. Johnson and Matt Wachowiak

Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA

Correspondence to be sent to: Daniel Wesson, Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. e-mail: wesson{at}bu.edu


   Abstract

Sniffing, a rhythmic inhalation and exhalation of air through the nose, is a behavior thought to play a critical role in shaping how odor information is represented and processed by the nervous system. Although the mouse has become a prominent model for studying olfaction, little is known about sniffing behavior in mice. Here, we characterized mouse sniffing behavior by measuring intranasal pressure transients in behaving mice. Sniffing was monitored during unstructured exploratory behavior and during performance of 3 commonly used olfactory paradigms: a habituation/dishabituation task, a sand digging–based discrimination task, and a nose poke–based discrimination task. We found that respiration frequencies in quiescent mice ranged from 3 to 5 Hz—higher than that reported for rats. During exploration, sniff frequency increased up to ~12 Hz and was highly dynamic, with rapid changes in frequency, amplitude, and waveform. Sniffing behavior varied strongly between tasks as well as for different behavioral epochs of each task. For example, mice performing the digging-based task showed little increase in sniff frequency prior to digging, whereas mice performing a nose poke–based task showed robust increases. Mice showed large increases in sniff frequency prior to reward delivery in all tasks. Mice also showed increases in sniff frequency when nose poking in a nonodor-guided task. These results show that mouse sniffing behavior is highly dynamic, varies with behavioral context, and is strongly modulated by olfactory as well as nonolfactory events.

Key words: digging, discrimination, go/no-go, habituation, nose poke, respiration

Accepted 6 May 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. W. Wesson, J. V. Verhagen, and M. Wachowiak
Why Sniff Fast? The Relationship Between Sniff Frequency, Odor Discrimination, and Receptor Neuron Activation in the Rat
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 1089 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. M. Carey, J. V. Verhagen, D. W. Wesson, N. Pirez, and M. Wachowiak
Temporal Structure of Receptor Neuron Input to the Olfactory Bulb Imaged in Behaving Rats
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 1073 - 1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.