Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ikai, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ikai, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 24: 1-6, 1999
© Oxford University Press

The Distribution of Sugar Chains on the Vomeronasal Epithelium Observed with an Atomic Force Microscope

Toshiya Osada, Shinichiro Takezawa, Arimichi Itoh, Hideo Arakawa, Masumi Ichikawa1 and Atsushi Ikai

Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-0026 1 Anatomy and Embryology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Neuroscience, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8526, Japan

Correspondence to be sent to: Dr Toshiya Osada, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-0026, Japan. e-mail: tosada{at}bio.titech.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The distribution of sugar chains on tissue sections of the rat vomeronasal epithelium, and the adhesive force between the sugar and its specific lectin were examined with an atomic force microscope (AFM). AFM tips were modified with a lectin, Vicia villosa agglutinin, which recognizes terminal N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (GalNAc). When a modified tip scanned the luminal surface of the sensory epithelium, adhesive interactions between the tip and the sample surface were observed. The final rupture force was calculated to be ~50 pN based on the spring constant of the AFM cantilever. Distribution patterns of sugar chains obtained from the force mapping image were very similar to those observed using fluorescence-labeled lectin staining. AFM also revealed distribution patterns of sugar chains at a higher resolution than those obtained with fluorescence microscopy. Most of the adhesive interactions disappeared when the scanning solution contained 1 mM GalNAc. The adhesive interactions were restored by removing the sugar from the solution. Findings suggest that the adhesion force observed are related to the binding force between the lectin and the sugars distributed across the vomeronasal epithelium.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The atomic force microscope (AFM) was developed as a scanning probe microscope which gives high resolution images by recording interactions between the scanning probe and sample surface (Binnig et al., 1982Go, 1986Go). Recently, AFM images using biological materials have been reported. For example, the typical circular structure of plasmid DNAs and complexes between DNA and proteins have been resolved with the AFM (Bustamante, et al., 1992Go; Vesenka et al., 1992Go; Hansma and Hoh, 1994Go). Other biological materials such as proteins (Weisenhorn et al., 1990Go; Hallett et al., 1995Go), viruses (Ikai et al., 1993Go; Imai et al., 1993Go) and cell surfaces (Paul et al., 1994Go; Eppell et al., 1995Go) have been extensively studied with the AFM. The AFM can be used for both conductive and insulating materials both in liquid and in air (Lal and John, 1994Go), which allows the AFM to be used in biological systems such as RNA polymerase activity (Kasas et al., 1997Go), the clotting process of fibrinogen (Drake et al., 1989Go) and cell growth of yeast cells (Gad and Ikai, 1995Go). As the AFM tip comes into contact with the sample surface, physical properties of the sample as well as its topography can be obtained (Ikai, 1996Go; Mitsui et al., 1996Go; Brown and Hoh, 1997Go; Oberleithner et al., 1997Go; Rief et al., 1997Go). AFM can also be used to measure specific forces between the probe tip and the sample surface. It is possible to measure the forces between the sample surface and any material selected by modifying the AFM tip with that material. It has been shown that the binding forces between DNA base pairs (Boland and Ratner, 1995Go), avidin and biotin (Lee et al., 1994Go; Ludwig et al., 1997Go), ligand and receptor (Florin et al., 1994Go; Moy et al., 1994Go) and antigen and antibody (Dammer et al., 1996Go; Hinterdorfer et al., 1996Go; Allen et al., 1997Go; You et al., 1997Go) can be measured using an AFM.

The vomeronasal organ is located at the base of the nasal septum and originates from the olfactory placode. The neuroepithelium of the vomeronasal organ (Wysocki, 1979Go; Halpern, 1987Go) is similar in structure to the olfactory epithelium, consisting of supporting cells, receptor neurons and precursor cells. The vomeronasal organ functions to detect substances such as pheromones associated with social and reproductive behaviors. These substances may be detected by receptors which are most likely located on the microvillar surface of vomeronasal sensory neurons.

In a previous paper (Osada et al., 1998Go) we described a new method for the preparation of vomeronasal tissue sections which allowed us to obtain AFM images comparable to images obtained using the transmission electron microscope (TEM). Most subcellular structures of the vomeronasal epithelium observed with the TEM were also observed with the AFM. In this report we describe another potential AFM application for the study of the vomeronasal organ. As the AFM tip makes contact with the sample surface, it is possible to measure the binding force between pheromone substances and their receptors. Since rat pheromones are not yet available, we used Vicia villosa agglutinin (VVA), which is reported to label the luminal surface of vomeronasal sensory epithelium (Takami et al., 1994Go).


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tissue sections

Sprague–Dawley rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, i.p.) and perfused with physiological saline followed by fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. The vomeronasal organs were removed and kept in the fixative solution overnight. The organs were cut into 20-µm-thick sections using a freezing microtome. Sections were mounted onto gelatin-coated slides and stored at –80°C until used.

Lectin staining

The sample sections were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled VVA (Sigma, St Louis, MO) for 1 h followed by washing in three changes of PBS for at least 10 min each. Sections were coverslipped with water-based mountant (PermaFlour Lipshaw) and observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (MRC-600, Bio-Rad, Tokyo, Japan).

Preparation of AFM tips

Free sulfhydryl groups were introduced onto VVA by derivatization with long-chain succinimidyl 6-[3'-(2-pyridyldithio)-propionamido] (Pierce, IL, USA) followed by the reduction with dithiothreitol (DTT). The sample solution was applied to Sephadex G-25 (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) to remove DTT. About four thiol groups were introduced on VVA as estimated from the determination of generated pyridine-2-thione with a spectrophotometer. Gold-coated AFM tips (OMCL-TR400PB; OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) with a nominal spring constant of 0.025 N/m were modified with the derived VVA through Au–S bonds.

Atomic force microscopy

AFM was performed in force volume mode using an NVB100 AFM (OLYMPUS) in combination with an inverted optical microscope. All experiments were done in Petri dishes filled with PBS. The scan area was divided into 16 x 16 sub-areas, where force curves were obtained in each sub-area. Both the horizontal and vertical scan rates were 1 Hz. The maximum pressure between the tip and the sample surface was controlled using the trigger mode, so that the maximum bending of the cantilever was limited to 10 nm.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In previous studies FITC-labeled VVA was reported to stain only the microvillar surface of the vomeronasal sensory epithelium (Takami et al., 1994Go). Figure 1Goa confirms these results and illustrates the intense fluorescence observed at the microvillar surface. Figure 1Gob shows an AFM cantilever over the section of the vomeronasal epithelium with a tip located at its end, although this cannot be seen in the figure. The position of the tip was controlled using an optical microscope.



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 (a)Binding of FITC-labeled VVA in a histological section of the rat vomeronasal organ. Very intense fluorescence is present in the microvilli surface of the sensory epithelium. The sensory epithelium (se), the lumen (lm) and a blood vessel (bv) can be seen. (b)Photomicrograph of an AFM cantilever over a histological section of the rat vomeronasal organ. A tip which is mounted on the end of the cantilever scans the sample surface. Scale bar = 100 µm.

 
Figure 2Goa shows a schematic drawing of the AFM force curve. The ordinate is the deflection of the cantilever and the abscissa is the distance moved by the piezoelectronics that drives the cantilever up or down relative to the sample surface. When the cantilever approaches, the force curve is initially flat until it reaches the sample surface, where it starts to be deflected linearly. After the cantilever starts to retract at the left end of the diagram, the curve closely follows the previous approach curve until the deflection returns to the initial level. When the cantilever is withdrawn, the adhesion force between the tip and the surface causes the cantilever to bend towards the sample for some distance. This distance can be used to estimate the rupture force required to break the adhesion (force = II x spring constant of the cantilever). The length of the sugar chain pulled by cantilever can be obtained by subtracting II from I. Force curves were obtained from 256 sub-areas to map the distribution of the specific sugar. Force curves are classified into three categories. The first group includes force curves with rupture events (Figure 2Gob), which indicates adhesion events between the lectin molecules and sugar chains. The second group includes force curves without rupture events (Figure 2Go), which shows no interaction between the tip and the sample. The last group contains force curves that appear when the tip could not reach the sample surface (data not shown). This indicates that the sample has a groove deeper than the vertical scan range (1 µm) of the force curve. These force curves were observed in this experiment when the tip scanned over the lumen of the vomeronasal epithelium.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (a) Schematic drawing of an AFM force curve. Typical examples of force curves are shown in (b) and (c). In (b), the retrace line of the force curve shows adhesion force between the tip and the sample, which represents the VVA-GalNAc interaction. In contrast, (c) shows no interaction, which indicates GalNAc was not present.

 
Figure 3Go shows the distribution of these three kinds of force curves. As shown in Figure 3Goa,b the adhesive points were distributed at the boundary of a groove and rarely existed on internal area as one can see in Figure 3Goc. The distributions shown in Figure 3Goa,b were reproduced in sequential scanning of the same area. Based on microscopic observation of the tip position during force mapping, it was determined that the zone of adhesion was on the microvillar surface of the sensory epithelium. The distribution of the adhesion observed with AFM corresponded to the fluorescence image in Figure 1Goa, except that the AFM adhesion zone seemed to make two lines where the fluorescence did not. To confirm this result we observed the VVA FITC-stained tissue section using a confocal microscope. When we focused on a thin layer at the top surface of the sample, we observed two lines of fluorescence (Figure 3God).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Distribution of adhesion force between the tip and the surface of the histological section (a, b, c). Each black pixel was interpreted as representing a position where GalNAc was present. Gray pixels indicate the lumen of the vomeronasal epithelium. (a) and (b) reveal that GalNAc is present at the microvillar surface. (c) shows the force mapping image on sensory epithelium, where there were few detected adhesions. These images show the force mapping in a 10 x 10 µm scanning area. To confirm the results of (a) and (b), we observed the VVA FITC-stained tissue section using confocal microscopy. When we focused on a thin layer of the top surface, two lines of fluorescence were observed (d). Scale bar = 50 µm.

 
In order to confirm that the observed adhesion was due to he specific binding of the lectin to N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (GalNAc), a competitive experiment was carried out. Figure 4Goa shows the force mapping within a 500 x 500 nm scanning area in the adhesive zone. Then GalNAc (1 mM) in PBS was added to the Petri dish and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The frequency of the adhesion was dramatically decreased, as shown in Figure 4Gob. The adhesion was recovered after the solution in the Petri dish was washed with PBS three times. Given these observations, together with the results illustrated in Figure 3Go showing the position specificity of the adhesion, we concluded that the measured adhesion force was due to specific binding between VVA and GalNAc.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 In order to clarify that the observed adhesion is due to the specific binding of the VVA to GalNAc, a competitive binding experiment was carried out. (a) The force mapping in the adhesive zone (500 x 500 nm). Then GalNAc (1 mM) was added to the Petri dish and incubated for 30 min. The frequency of the adhesions detected was dramatically decreased, as shown in (b). The adhesion recovered after the solution was replaced with PBS.

 
The advantage of using AFM to detect ligand distribution lies not only in its high resolution but also in its ability to detect the strength of the binding and the length of the interaction. We analyzed the force curves that show rupture events from this point of view. The binding force and length were determined as shown in Figure 2Goa. The histogram of the binding force (Figure 5Goa) showed a peak around 50 pN. This value represents the force needed to rupture the binding between the lectin and the sugar. Some very strong rupture forces may represent a multiple binding effect. The histogram of the length (Figure 5Gob) showed a more dispersed distribution, suggesting that the bound sugar chains were pulled for some length (~800 nm).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Histogram of binding forces showing a peak around 50 pN (a). This value represents the force needed to rupture the binding force between VVA and GalNAc. The histogram of the length showed a more dispersed distribution, which indicates that the bound sugar chains were pulled for some length (b).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
AFM tips modified with VVA have been employed to map the distribution of terminal GalNAc on vomeronasal epithelial sections. The results shown in Figure 3Goa,b illustrate the high resolution of specific sugar mapping with an AFM. The distribution of the sugar forming two bands was not seen with fluorescence microscopy. This illustrates the unique potential of the AFM method in determining the fine distribution of ligands or receptors. Findings suggest that GalNAc is enriched in the apical and basal thirds of microvilli but not in middle third. This distribution pattern of sugars has not been reported before. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that these are artificial structures due to sample preparation.

When the epithelial sections were mapped with only the gold-coated AFM tips without any modification, many adhesion forces were observed randomly (data not shown). This is due to non-specific interaction between gold and the ample surface as reported previously ( Allen et al., 1997Go). When the gold-coated AFM tips were modified with bovine serum albumin or other lectins which cannot stain vomeronasal epithelial sections, the non-specific interactions disappeared (data not shown). The modified tip with VVA can be used not only to detect specific binding between VVA and the sugar but also to reduce non-specific binding between gold and the sample surface. We confirmed that the adhesive forces observed here was specific binding between VVA and the sugar using competitive experiments, as shown in Figure 4Go.

Figure 5Go suggests that this method has the ability to examine properties of the detected binding. As we succeeded in measuring binding forces, it is possible to distinguish and compare the sites with different binding forces. This is important when several similar receptors with different binding forces to the same ligand are distributed in a tissue. Our method will open a new way to map individual receptors. The length of interaction was distributed divergently. This may come from the wide distribution of the length of the detected sugar chains. The other possibility is that the membrane where the sugar chains were anchored as deformed differently when pulled. Further investigation is needed to determine the cause of the observed distribution. This method may be useful for examining the interaction between pheromone and its receptor and the distribution of the receptors on the luminal surface of the sensory epithelium.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr R. Costanzo for critically reviewing the manuscript and for helpful discussion. We also thank N. Iwasaki for her technical assistance. This research was supported by CREST (J.S.T.).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Allen, S., Chen, X., Davies, J., Davies, M.C., Dawkes, A.C., Edwards, J.C., Roberts, C.J., Sefton, J., Tendler, S.J.B. and Williams, P.M. (1997) Detection of antigen–antibody binding events with the atomic force microscope. Biochemistry, 36,7457 –7463.[Medline]

Binnig, G., Quate, C.F., Gerber, C.H. and Weibel, E. (1982) Surface studies by scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 57–61.

Binnig, G., Rohrer, H. and Gerber, C.H. (1986) Atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett., 56,930 –933.[Web of Science][Medline]

Boland, T. and Ratner, B.D. (1995) Direct measurement of hydrogen binding in DNA nucleotide bases by atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 5297–5301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brown, H.G. and Hoh, J.H. (1997) Entropic exclusion by neurofilament sidearms: a mechanism for maintaining interfilament spacing. Biochemistry, 36, 15035–15040.[Medline]

Bustamante, C.J., Vesenka, J., Tang, C.L., Rees, W., Guthold, M. and Keller, R. (1992) Circular DNA molecules imaged in air by scanning force microscopy. Biochemistry, 31, 22–26.[Medline]

Dammer, U., Hegner, M., Anselmetti, D., Wagner, P., Dreier, M., Huber, W. and Guntherodt, H.J. (1996) Specific antigen/antibody interaction measured by force microscopy. Biophys. J., 70, 2437–2441.[Web of Science][Medline]

Drake, B., Orater, C.B., Weisenhorn, A.L., Gould, S.A.C., Albrecht, T.R., Quate, C.F., Cannell, D.S., Hansma, H.G. and Hansma, P.K. (1989) Imaging crystals, polymers and processes in water with the atomic force microscope. Science, 243, 1586–1589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eppell, S.J., Simmons, S.R., Albrecht, R.M. and Marchant, R.E. (1995) Cell surface receptors and proteins of platelet membranes imaged by scanning force microscopy using immunogold contrast enhancement. Biophys. J., 68, 671–680.[Web of Science][Medline]

Florin, E.L., Moy, V.T. and Gaub, H.E. (1994) Adhesion forces between individual ligand pairs. Science, 264, 415–417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gad, M. and Ikai, A. (1995) Method for immobilizing microbial cells on gel surface for dynamic AFM studies. Biophys. J., 69, 2226–2233.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hallett, P., Offer, G. and Miles, M.T. (1995) Atomic force microscopy of the myosin molecule. Biophys. J., 68, 1604–1606.[Web of Science][Medline]

Halpern, M. (1987) The organization and function of the vomeronasal system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 10,325 –362.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hansma, H.G. and Hoh, J. (1994) Biomolecular imaging with the atomic force microscope. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 23, 115–139.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hinterdorfer, P., Baumgartner, W., Gruber, H.J., Schilcher, K. and Schindler, H. (1996) Detection and localization of individual antibody– antigen recognition events by atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 3477–3481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ikai, A., Yoshimura, K., Arisaka, F., Ritani, A. and Imai, K. (1993) Atomic force microscopy of bacteriophage T4 and its tube–baseplate complex. FEBS Lett., 326, 39–41.[Web of Science][Medline]

Ikai, A. (1996) STM and AFM of bio/organic molecules and structure. Surface Sci. Rep., 26, 261–332.

Imai, K., Yoshimura, K., Tomitori, M., Nishikawa, O., Kokawa, R., Yamamoto, M., Kobayashi, M. and Ikai. A. (1993) Scanning tunneling and atomic force microscopy of T4 bacteriophage and tobacco mosaic viruses. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 32, 2962–2964.[Web of Science]

Kasas, S., Thomson, N.H., Smith, B.L., Hansma, H.G., Zhu, X., Guthold, M., Bustamante, C., Kool, E.T., Kashlev, M. and Hansma, P.K. (1997) Escherichia coli RNA polymerase activity observed using atomic force microscopy. Biochemistry, 36,461 –468.[Medline]

Lal, R. and John, S.A. (1994) Biological applications of atomic force microscopy. Am. J. Physiol., 266, C1–C21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee, G.U., Kidwell, D.A. and Colton R.C. (1994) Sensing discrete streptavidin–biotin interactions with atomic force microscopy. Langmuir, 10, 354–357.[Web of Science]

Ludwig, M., Dettmann, W. and Gaub, H.E. (1997) Atomic force microscope imaging contrast based on molecular recognition. Biophys. J., 72,445 –448.[Web of Science][Medline]

Mitsui, K., Hara, M. and Ikai, A. (1996) Mechanical unfolding of alpha-2-macroglobulin molecules with atomic force microscope. FEBS Lett., 385,29 –33.[Web of Science][Medline]

Moy, V.T., Florin, E.L. and Gaub, H.E. (1994) Intermolecular forces and energies between ligands and receptors. Science, 266,257 –259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oberleithner, H., Schneider, S.W. and Henderson, R.M. (1997) Structual activity of a cloned potassium channel (ROMK1) monitored with the atomic force microscope: the `molecular-sandwich' technique. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 14144–14149.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Osada, T., Arakawa, H., Ichikawa, M. and Ikai, A. (1998) Atomic force microscopy of histological sections using a new electron beam etching method. J. Microsc., 189, 43–49.

Paul, J.K., Nettikadan, S.R., Ganjeizadeh, Yamaguchi, M. and Takeyasu, K. (1994) Molecular imaging of Na+, K+-ATPase in purified kidney membranes. FEBS Lett.,346 , 289–294.[Web of Science][Medline]

Rief, M., Gautel, M., Oesterhelt, F., Fernandez, J.M. and Gaub, H.E. (1997) Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM. Science, 276, 1109–1112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takami, S., Getchell, M.L. and Getchell, T.V. (1993) Lectin histochemical localization of galactose, N-acetylgalactosamine and N-acetylglucosamine in glycoconjugates of the rat vomeronasal organ, with comparison to the olfactory and septal mucosae. Cell Tissue Res., 277, 211–230.[Web of Science]

Vesenka, J., Guthold, M., Tang, C.L., Keller, D., Delaine, E. and Bustamante, C. (1992) A substrate preparation for reliable imaging of DNA molecules with the scanning force microscope. Ultramicroscopy, 42/44, 1243–1249.

Weisenhorn, A.L., Drake, B., Prater, C.B., Gould, S.A.C., Hansma, P.K., Ohnesorge, F., Egger, M., Heyn, S.P. and Gaub, H.E. (1990) Immobilized proteins in buffer imaged at molecular resolution by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J., 58,1251 –1258.[Web of Science][Medline]

Wysocki, C.J. (1979) Neurobehavioral evidence for the involvement of the vomeronasal system in mammalian reproduction. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 3, 301–341.[Web of Science][Medline]

You, H. and Yu, L. (1997) Investigation of the image contrast of tapping-mode atomic force microscopy using protein-modified cantilever tips. Biophys. J., 73, 3299–3308.[Web of Science][Medline]

Accepted September 7, 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ikai, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ikai, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?