Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tinti, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Nofre, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tinti, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Nofre, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 26: 231-237, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Responses of the Ant Lasius niger to Various Compounds Perceived as Sweet in Humans: a Structure–Activity Relationship Study

Jean-Marie Tinti and Claude Nofre

Faculty of Medicine of Lyon Laennec, University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France

Correspondence to be sent to: Claude Nofre, 114 Cours Albert Thomas, F-69008 Lyon, France. e-mail: cnofre{at}worldnet.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A behavioural study on the ant Lasius niger was performed by observing its feeding responses to 85 compounds presented in a two-choice situation (tested compound versus water control or sucrose solution). Among these compounds, only 21 were phagostimulating: six monosaccharides (D-glucose, 6-deoxy-D-glucose, L-galactose, L-fucose, D-fructose, L-sorbose), four derivatives of D-glucose (methyl {alpha}-D-glucoside, D-gluconolactone and 6-chloro- and 6-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose), five disaccharides (sucrose, maltose, palatinose, turanose and isomaltose), one polyol glycoside (maltitol), three trisaccharides (melezitose, raffinose and maltotriose) and two polyols (sorbitol and L-iditol). None of the 16 non-carbohydrate non-polyol compounds tested, although perceived as sweet in humans, was found to be active in ants. The molar order of effectiveness of the major naturally occuring compounds (melezitose > sucrose = raffinose > D-glucose > D-fructose = maltose = sorbitol) is basically different from the molar order of their sweetness potency in humans (sucrose > D-fructose > melezitose > maltose > D-glucose = raffinose = sorbitol). On a molar basis melezitose is in L. niger about twice as effective as sucrose or raffinose, while D-glucose and D-fructose are three and four times less effective, respectively, than sucrose or raffinose. From a structure–activity relationship study it was inferred that the active monosaccharides and polyols should interact with the ant receptor through only one type of receptor, through the same binding pocket and the same binding residues, via a six-point interaction. The high effectiveness of melezitose in L. niger mirrors the feeding habits of these ants, which attend homopterans and are heavy feeders on their honeydew, which is very rich in this carbohydrate.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Since the pioneering work of Schmidt (Schmidt, 1938Go), few studies on the feeding responses of ants towards carbohydrates (or related compounds) have been published (Ricks and Vinson, 1970Go; Vander Meer and Merdinger, 1990Go; Vander Meer et al., 1995Go). The purpose of the present work has been to investigate, through an extensive study of 85 compounds (37 monosaccharides and derivatives, 16 oligosaccharides and derivatives, 16 polyols and 16 non-carbohydrate non-polyol compounds known to taste sweet in humans), the feeding responses of the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in order to analyse the possible structure–activity relationships that can be deduced from the data thus obtained.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials

Lasius niger ants (black or common garden ants), living in their natural ‘field’ conditions, were used. This species is very common and widespread in Europe. The three colonies used in the present work were located in the area of Lyon (France). Tests were conducted during four successive years from mid-April to mid-June, in outdoor conditions and close to a nest entrance (<0.50 m). At the beginning of each annual session an artificial foraging area regularly visited by ants was created by using as initial bait a 200 g/l sucrose solution (placed in a multiwell plate with 48 wells of 25 µl).

Compounds in aqueous solution were placed on a polypropylene multiwell plate (GenNunc module no. 2-32298) provided with 48 wells of 25 µl. The dimensions of the wells (diameter 3 mm, depth 4 mm) were proportional to ant size (4–5 mm), which limited the number of insects (4–6) capable of feeding simultaneously at the same well. The short distance between the well sides (~6 mm) favoured methodical exploration of the wells by the ants. In order to reduce possible formation of pheromone trails and ensure a random comparison, wells were alternately filled with the test fluid and the water control.

All carbohydrates, derivatives and polyols were supplied by Sigma (except for {alpha}-D-glucose and L-threitol, which were obtained from Aldrich) and were tested at a concentration of 1 mol/l (pilot experiments with more dilute solutions gave noticeably lower recruitment, which increased the test duration and, as a result, fluid evaporation).

The reducing carbohydrates were dissolved in water ~24 h before the test in order to ensure completion of the mutarotational equilibrium (except for {alpha}-D-glucose and ß-D-glucose, which were tested in freshly prepared solutions to avoid {alpha} interconversion).

The 16 non-carbohydrate non-polyol compounds tested were obtained from commercial sources or synthesized according to published data. Each compound was tested: (i) at a concentration that was equivalent, on a sweetness basis, to that of a 50–100 g/l sucrose solution in humans; (ii) at its highest possible concentration. The compounds used (with their origin and their concentrations) were as follows: acesulfame-K (from Supelco; 5 x 10–3 and 1.6 mol/l); alitame [according to Brennan and Hendrick (Brennan and Hendrick, 1981Go); 0.15 x 10–3 and 0.39 x 10–3 mol/l]; aspartame (from Sigma; 1.7 x 10–3 and 34 x 10–3 mol/l); cyanosuosan [according to Tinti et al. (Tinti et al., 1982Go); 0.64 x 10–3 and 2.1 x 10–3 mol/l]; sodium cyclamate (from Sigma; 15 x 10–3 and 1 mol/l); dulcin (from Interchim, France; 4.4 x 10–3 and 6.9 x 10–3 mol/l); magap (N-[(S)-2-methylhexanoyl]-{alpha}-L-glutamyl 5-aminopyridine 2-carbonitrile) [according to Nofre and Tinti (Nofre and Tinti, 1994Go); 0.014 x 10–3 and 0.11 mol/l]; neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (from Sigma; 0.16 x 10–3 mol/l); neotame [according to Nofre and Tinti (Nofre and Tinti, 1996Go, 2000Go); 26 x 10–6 and 27 x 10–3 mol/l]; perillartine (from Sigma; 1.8 x 10–3 and 3.6 x 10–3 mol/l); saccharin (from Aldrich; 2.2 x 10–3 and 18.5 x 10–3 mol/l); stevioside (from Fluka; 0.5 x 10–3 and 1.5 x 10–3 mol/l); sucralose (from Redpath, Canada; 0.4 x 10–3 and 0.63 mol/l); sucrononate (N-[N-cyclononylamino(4-cyanophenylimino)-methyl]-2-aminoethanoic acid) [according to Nofre et al. (Nofre et al., 1990Go); 1.5 x 10–6 and 29.2 x 10–6 mol/l]; suosan [according to Petersen and Müller (Petersen and Müller, 1948Go); 0.63 x 10–3 and 2.1 x 10–3 mol/l]; superaspartame [N-(4-cyanophenylcarbamoyl)-L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanine methyl ester] [according to Nofre and Tinti (Nofre and Tinti, 1987Go); 23 x 10–3 mol/l].

Methods

Compounds were declared ‘effective’ when total consumption of the test solutions (24 x 25 µl, i.e. 600 µl/plate) was achieved within 1 h after arrival of the first forager; note that within this short 1 h test period spontaneous evaporation of the solution was always low (<10% of the initial volume). Results were validated by repeating the same procedure with the other two colonies. Note that the water control was not consumed by the ants, except during certain specific climatic conditions, such as high temperatures or prolonged drought; in this case the tests were discarded and repeated during more favourable weather conditions.

Compounds were declared ‘ineffective’ when the test solutions were not consumed after the 1 h test period and when no ant recruitment was observed. Results were validated by replicating the same procedure with the other two colonies.

The relative effectiveness of several of these compounds was evaluated in a ‘pairwise’ comparison with reference to sucrose. The evaluation was based on the observation that the rate of consumption of sucrose increases with its concentration; for example, we observed that the individual intake doubles when the sucrose concentration increases from 50 to 100 g/l, as already noted by Josens et al. (Josens et al., 1998Go) in Camponotus mus. In practice, a sucrose solution of 100 g/l (0.292 mol/l) and the test solution were presented on the same plate (replacing the water control by the 100 g/l sucrose solution). When both the fluids elicited high level recruitment, tests were carefully monitored and interrupted as soon as the most preferred fluid was completely consumed; note that owing to the high number of ants recruited on the plate, lowering of the same fluid in the wells was uniform. Each compound was successively tested at concentrations in fractions or multiples of that of sucrose (i.e. at 0.0146, 0.292, 0.584, 0.876, 1.168 or 2.336 mol/l) until the consumption rate of the test fluid matched the consumption rate of the 100 g/l sucrose reference. Results were ascertained after three coherent tests had been observed in each colony.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
At the beginning of the annual session the recruitment level, the feeding time and the individual intake (i.e. the mean volume ingested by one ant during its visit to the plate) were assessed. Thus, with a 100 g/l sucrose solution (0.292 mol/l), ~100 (or more) ants were found on the plate, most staying motionless with their mouthparts in continuous contact with the fluid for an average time of feeding not less than 30–45 s, while many others were competing for access to the solutions; the individual volume intake, which was evaluated in the course of a separate experiment, was ~1.5 µl/ant at this sucrose concentration. With a 50 g/l sucrose solution (0.146 mol/l) the number of ants recruited was lower (20–50), with the feeding time unchanged and individual intake lowered to ~0.8 µl. With a 20 g/l sucrose solution (0.058 mol/l) consumption of the fluid was still observed, but with a brief feeding time and weak recruitment (10–20 ants). With more diluted sucrose solutions ant recruitment was very weak, but fluid consumption was still observed up to and including 5 g/l sucrose (0.0146 mol/l); lower concentrations of sucrose were always ineffective under our experimental conditions. Note that the lowest concentration value of sucrose still giving a feeding response in ants (~5 g/l or ~14.6 x 10–3 mol/l) is close to the value of the human recognition threshold for sucrose (~5.8 g/l or ~17 x 10–3 mol/l) (Amerine et al., 1965Go), which reflects an approximately equal effectiveness between the physiological responses of ants and humans towards sucrose.

Among the 27 monosaccharides examined only six elicited a phagostimulating activity in L. niger: four aldohexoses (D-glucose, 6-deoxy-D-glucose, L-galactose and L-fucose) and two ketohexoses (D-fructose and L-sorbose) (Table 1). Note that for D-glucose only the {alpha}-anomer ({alpha}-D-glucopyranose), when tested pure in a freshly prepared solution, is active, while the pure ß-anomer is inactive under the same conditions. Among the 10 monosaccharide derivatives examined only four were phagostimulants (methyl {alpha}-D-glucoside, D-gluconolactone and 6-chloro and 6-fluoro-6-deoxy-D-glucose).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Responses of L. niger to monosaccharides and derivatives
 
Of the 16 oligosaccharides and derivatives investigated eight were able to elicit a feeding response in the black ant: five disaccharides (sucrose, maltose, isomaltose, palatinose and turanose), a polyol glycoside (maltitol) and three trisaccharides (melezitose, raffinose and maltotriose) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Responses of L. niger to oligosaccharides and derivatives (polyol glycosides)
 
Among the 16 polyols tested (namely: a diol, ethylene glycol; a triol, glycerol; three tetrols, erythritol, D-threitol and L-threitol; four pentols, adonitol, D-arabitol, L-arabitol and xylitol; four hexols, galactitol, L-iditol, mannitol and sorbitol; two cyclohexols, myo-inositol and quebrachitol; a polyol anhydride, 1,5-anhydro-D-mannitol) only two were phagostimulants, sorbitol (D-glucitol) and L-iditol.

It should be noted that among the 16 non-carbohydrate non-polyol compounds tested (namely acesulfame-K, alitame, aspartame, cyanosuosan, sodium cyclamate, dulcin, magap, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, neotame, perillartine, saccharin, stevioside, sucralose, sucrononate, suosan and superaspartame) none was active in L. niger, although all are known to be perceived as sweet by humans.

The approximate effectiveness values in L. niger of 13 selected active compounds, on a molar basis and with regard to a 100 g/l sucrose solution, are reported in Table 3. We observed that under these conditions melezitose is approximately twice as effective as sucrose and raffinose is as effective as sucrose [the high effectiveness of melezitose and raffinose in starved L. niger has already been noted by Schmidt (1938)Go], while D-glucose and D-fructose (in their equilibrium isomeric mixtures) are about three and four times less active, respectively, than sucrose. If we consider only the major naturally occuring compounds, their molar order of effectiveness in L. niger is as follows: melezitose > sucrose = raffinose > D-glucose > D-fructose = maltose = sorbitol. Their molar order of effectiveness in ants is therefore essentially different from their molar order of sweetness in humans, which is: sucrose > D-fructose > melezitose > maltose > D-glucose = raffinose = sorbitol (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Approximate effectiveness in L. niger of some carbohydrates and derivatives relative to sucrose; comparison with their sweetness potencies in humans relative to sucrose
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
From the above results certain relationships between the structures of the compounds tested and their phagostimulating activity in L. niger can be deduced.

For the active aldohexoses (such as D-glucose and 6-deoxy-D-glucose) our data permit us to infer that these monosaccharides interact with the sugar receptor of L. niger through six interaction points, namely through their 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-OH groups, their heterocyclic oxygen atom and their 6-CH2 (or 6-CH3) group (see Figure 1.1 and 1.2). For example, the 1{alpha}-OH hemiacetal group of D-glucopyranose must be required since only the {alpha}-anomer of D-glucopyranose (Figure 2.1) is effective and not the ß-anomer (Figure 2.2); moreover, the oxygen atom of the 1{alpha}-OH group must be involved (possibly as a hydrogen bond acceptor) since methyl {alpha}-D-glucoside (Figure 2.3) and D-gluconolactone (Figure 2.4) are both active. As the anomer distribution at mutarotational equilibrium is ~36% {alpha}-D-glucopyranose and ~64% ß-D-glucopyranose and as the phagostimulating activity of D-glucose at equilibrium is about one-third that of sucrose (Table 3), the calculated effectiveness value of {alpha}-D-glucopyranose should be near that of sucrose (~0.9 times that of sucrose on a molar basis); as a result, we deduce that sucrose should interact with the ant receptor in large part through its glucopyranosyl moiety. The three equatorial 2-, 3- and 4-OH alcohol groups of D-glucose must be involved since 2-deoxy-D-glucose (Figure 2.5), D-mannose (Figure 2.6), 3-deoxy-D-glucose (Figure 2.7), D-allose (Figure 2.8) and D-galactose (Figure 2.9) are ineffective. The 5-O heterocyclic oxygen is essential to the interaction, since 5-thio-D-glucose (Figure 2.10), a structural analogue of D-glucose, is inactive. Finally, only the 6-OH alcohol group of D-glucose can be deleted without affecting feeding stimulation: in fact, 6-deoxy-D-glucose (Figure 2.11) is as effective as D-glucose (Table 3). However, lack of the 6-CH2OH group, as found in D-xylose (Figure 2.12), precludes a feeding response, which substantiates a contribution of the 6-CH2 (or 6-CH3) group to the interaction with the receptor, probably through a steric interaction.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The putative interaction points (boxed groups and atoms) of (1) {alpha}-D-glucopyranose, (2) 6-deoxy-{alpha}-D-glucopyranose.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (1) {alpha}-D-Glucopyranose; (2) ß-D-glucopyranose; (3) methyl {alpha}-D-glucopyranoside; (4) D-gluconolactone; (5) 2-deoxy-{alpha}-D-glucopyranose; (6) {alpha}-D-mannopyranose; (7) 3-deoxy-{alpha}-D-glucopyranose; (8) {alpha}-D-allopyranose; (9) {alpha}-D-galactopyranose; (10) 5-thio-{alpha}-D-glucopyranose; (11) 6-deoxy-{alpha}-D-glucopyranose; (12) {alpha}-D-xylopyranose.

 
For the active ketohexoses (D-fructose and L-sorbose) we assume that these compounds should also interact with the ant receptor through a six-point interaction, namely through their 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-OH groups, their heterocyclic oxygen atom and their 6-CH2 group (see Figure 3.1 and 3.2), via the same sugar receptor type and the same receptor binding sites as those used by the active aldohexoses. For example, for ß-D-fructopyranose (which is the major constituent of the D-fructose isomeric mixture in aqueous solution) the 1-CH2OH alcohol group (Figure 4.1) must be required since D-arabinose (Figure 4.2) is ineffective. Its 2ß-OH hemiacetal group is necessary since 1,5-anhydro-D-mannitol (Figure 4.3) is inactive. Its two equatorial 3- and 4-OH alcohol groups must also be involved since D-psicose (Figure 4.4) and D-tagatose (Figure 4.5) are not phagostimulants. As L-sorbose (Figure 4.6), which differs from D-fructose only in the configurational position of the 5-OH alcohol group (compare Figure 4.1 and 4.6), has the same effectiveness as D-fructose (Table 3), the 5-OH group of these molecules must not take part in the interaction. Finally, we assume, by analogy with D-glucopyranose, that their 6-O heterocyclic oxygen and their 6-CH2 group should also be involved in the interaction. As the proportion of ß-D-fructopyranose is ~73% in the isomer mixture at equilibrium and as the phagostimulating activity of D-fructose is, at equilibrium, about one-fourth that of sucrose (Table 3), the calculated effectiveness value of ß-D-fructopyranose should be approximately one-third (~0.33) that of sucrose on a molar basis, lower than that of {alpha}-D-glucopyranose (~0.9 times that of sucrose).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 The putative interaction points (boxed groups and atoms) of (1) ß-D-fructopyranose, (2) {alpha}-L-sorbopyranose.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 (1) ß-D-Fructopyranose; (2) ß-D-arabinopyranose; (3) 1,5-anhydro-D-mannitol; (4) ß-D-psicopyranose; (5) ß-D-tagatopyranose; (6) {alpha}-L-sorbopyranose.

 
For the polyols the phagostimulating activities of sorbitol (Figure 5.1) and L-iditol (Figure 5.2) are probably the consequence of their ability to correctly position in space six groups able to play the role of the six interaction points postulated for the active aldohexoses and ketohexoses; compare, for example, the formulae of sorbitol (Figure 5.1) and {alpha}-D-glucopyranose (Figure 1.1) and those of L-iditol (Figure 5.2) and {alpha}-L-sorbopyranose (Figure 3.2). The inactivity of mannitol and galactitol, two epimers of sorbitol (D-glucitol), argue in favour of this view.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 The putative interaction points (boxed groups and atoms) of (1) sorbitol (D-glucitol), (2) L-iditol.

 
The foregoing structure–activity relationship data are consistent with the view that in L. niger all the effective monosaccharides (such as D-glucose and D-fructose) interact: (i) with only one type of carbohydrate gustatory receptor; (ii) through only one mode of interaction, i.e. via the same binding pocket and the same binding residues of the carbohydrate receptor. The mode of interaction of D-glucose and D-fructose in L. niger appears: (i) to be closely related to that reported in the acalyptrate fly Drosophila melanogaster, in which both these hexoses appear to interact with the receptor through the same mode of interaction (Wieczorek and Wolff, 1989Go); (ii) to be basically different from that recognised in the calyptrate flies (such as the blowfly Phormia regina or the fleshfly Boettcherisca peregrina), in which these two hexoses are known to interact with the receptor through two distinct modes of interaction (Evans, 1963Go; Omand and Dethier, 1969Go; Hanamori et al., 1974Go; Shimada et al., 1974Go; Shimada, 1987Go).

In conclusion, L. niger, which is polyphagous, like many ant species, is above all known for its preference for collecting nectar and attending aphids (El-Ziady and Kennedy, 1956Go; Kiss, 1981Go). Its gustatory preferences for certain specific carbohydrates, as noted in the present work, reflect its feeding choices, such as its marked predilection for the carbohydrates usually found in nectar (sucrose, D-fructose, D-glucose and raffinose) and in homopteran honeydew (mainly melezitose, but also its hydrolysis products, turanose, D-glucose and D-fructose) (Hussain et al., 1974Go; Owen, 1978Go; Belliardo et al., 1979Go; Lombard et al., 1987Go; Hendrix et al., 1992Go).


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors are grateful to Edith Le Bredonchel for technical assistance.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Amerine, M.A., Pangborn, R.M. and Roessler, E.B. (1965) Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food. Academic Press, New York, p. 88.

Belliardo, F., Buffa, M., Patetta, A. and Manino, A. (1979) Identification of melezitose and erlose in floral and honeydew honeys. Carbohydr. Res., 71, 335–338.

Brennan, T.M. and Hendrick, M.E. (1981) Branched amides of L-aspartyl-D-amino acid dipeptides and compositions thereof, European Patent Application 34 876.

El-Ziady, S. and Kennedy, J.S. (1956) Beneficial effects of the common garden ant, Lasius niger L., on the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae Scopoli. Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, 31, 61–65.

Evans, D.R. (1963) Chemical structure and stimulation by carbohydrates. In Zotterman, Y. (ed.), Olfaction and Taste I. Macmillan, New York, pp. 165–176.

Hanamori, T., Shiraishi, A., Kijima, H. and Morita, H. (1974) Structure of effective monosaccharides in stimulation of the sugar receptor of the fly. Chem. Senses Flavor, 1, 147–166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hendrix, D.L., Wei, Y.-A. and Leggett, J.E. (1992) Homopteran honeydew sugar composition is determined by both the insect and plant species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B, 101, 23–27.

Hussain, A, Forrest, J.M.S. and Dixon, A.F.G. (1974) Sugar, organic acid, phenolic acid and plant growth regulator content of extracts of honeydew of the aphid Myzus persicae and of its host plant Raphanus sativus. Ann. Appl. Biol., 78, 65–73.[Medline]

Josens, R.B., Farina, W.M. and Roces, F. (1998) Nectar feeding by the ant Camponotus mus: intake rate and crop filling as a function of sucrose concentration. J. Insect Physiol., 44, 579–585.[Web of Science][Medline]

Kiss, A. (1981) Melezitose, aphids and ants. Oikos, 37, 382.

Lombard, A., Buffa, M., Patetta, A., Manino, A. and Marletto, F. (1987) Some aspects of the carbohydrate composition of Callaphidid honeydew. J. Api. Res., 26, 233–237.

Nofre, C. and Tinti, J.-M. (1987) Sweetening agents, US Patent 4,645,678.

Nofre, C. and Tinti, J.-M. (1994) Sweetening agent derived from L-aspartic or L-glutamic acid, US patent 5,310,908.

Nofre, C. and Tinti, J.-M. (1996) Method of preparing a compound derived from aspartame, useful as sweetening agents, US Patent 5,510,508.

Nofre, C. and Tinti, J.-M. (2000) Neotame: discovery, properties, utility. Food Chem., 69, 245–257.

Nofre, C., Tinti, J.-M. and Ouar Chatzopoulos, F. (1990) Sweetening agents, US Patent 4,921,939.

Omand, E. and Dethier, V. G. (1969) An electrophysiological analysis of the action of carbohydrates on the sugar receptor of the blowfly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 62, 136–143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Owen, D.F. (1978) Why do aphids synthesize melezitose? Oikos, 31, 264–267.

Petersen, S. and Müller, E. (1948) Über eine neue Gruppe von Süßstoffen. Chem. Ber., 81, 31–38.

Ricks, B.L. and Vinson, S.B. (1970) Feeding acceptability of certain insects and various water-soluble compounds to two varieties of the imported fire ant. J. Econ. Entomol., 63, 145–148.

Schmidt, A. (1938) Geschmacksphysiologische Untersuchungen an Ameisen. Z. Vergl. Physiol., 25, 351–378.

Shimada, I. (1987) Stereospecificity of the mutiple receptor sites in the sugar taste receptor cell of the fleshfly. Chem. Senses, 12, 235–244.[Free Full Text]

Shimada, I., Shiraishi, A., Kijima, H., Morita, H. (1974) Separation of two receptor sites in a single labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly by treatment with p-chloromercuribenzoate. J. Insect Physiol., 20, 605–621.[Web of Science][Medline]

Tinti, J.-M., Nofre, C. and Peytavi, A.M. (1982) Interaction of suosan with the sweet taste receptor. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 175, 266–268.

Vander Meer, R.K. and Merdinger, E. (1990) Fire ant carbohydrate phagostimulants: laboratory and practical studies. Farmacia, 38, 93–102.

Vander Meer, R.K., Lofgren, C.S. and Seawright, J.A. (1995) Specificity of the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) phagostimulant response to carbohydrates. Fla Entomol., 78, 144–154.

Wieczorek, H. and Wolff, G. (1989) The labellar sugar receptor of Drosophila. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 164, 825–834.

Accepted October 4, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
B. Gordesky-Gold, N. Rivers, O. M. Ahmed, and P. A.S. Breslin
Drosophila melanogaster Prefers Compounds Perceived Sweet by Humans
Chem Senses, March 1, 2008; 33(3): 301 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tinti, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Nofre, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tinti, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Nofre, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?