Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wada, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ozaki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wada, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ozaki, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chem. Senses 26: 983-992, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Taste-enhancing Effects of Glycine on the Sweetness of Glucose

a Gustatory Aspect of Symbiosis between the Ant, Camponotus japonicus, and the Larvae of the Lycaenid Butterfly, Niphanda fusca

Ayako Wada, Yu Isobe1, Susumu Yamaguchi2, Ryohei Yamaoka and Mamiko Ozaki

Department of Applied Biology, Faculty of Textile Science, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Matsugasaki, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8585, Japan 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Nara Women's University, Nara 630-8506, Japan 2 205 Lakeside, 3-2-8 Ishikami-chyo, Nerima-ku, Tokyo 177-0041, Japan

Correspondence to be sent to: Mamiko Ozaki, Department of Applied Biology, Faculty of Textile Science, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto 606-8585, Japan. e-mail: mamiko{at}ipc.kit.ac.jp


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The lycaenid butterfly, Niphanda fusca, has a parasitic relationship with its host ant, Camponotus japonicus: the caterpillars may use chemical mimicry to enter the ant nest where they are fed mouth-to-mouth by the adult ants until pupation. Nevertheless, larvae offer their host ants a nutritious secretion that contains 160 mM glucose and 43 mM glycine. Using glucose and glycine mixture as artificial secretions, we investigated the gustatory effect of glucose and/or glycine on the ants. Glycine induced neither feeding behavior nor gustatory response in the ants if its concentration was <500 mM. In the presence of glycine at the concentration in the secretion, however, the ants improved their preference to glucose, and the sugar receptor cell exhibited electrophysiological enhancement of response to glucose in a glycine-concentration-dependent manner. By adding glycine to glucose in their secretions, therefore, the butterfly larvae can manipulate the gustatory sense of the ants. The alluring taste of `glycine-flavored glucose' could motivate the host ants to feed the larvae and thereby receive the secretions as a reward. The taste enhancement created by the combination of sugar and amino acid may play a role in the evolution of the parasitic relationships of these insects. The taste-enhancing effect appears to be analogous to taste enhancement by `umami' substances in humans.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The caterpillars of many species of lycaenid butterflies associate with ants and these interactions can range from parasitism to mutualism (Atsatt, 1981Go; Henning, 1983Go; Pierce, 1987Go; Thomas et al., 1989Go; Hölldobler and Wilson, 1990Go; Fiedler et al., 1996Go). One of the representative species in Japan, Niphanda fusca (Nagayama, 1950Go), remarkably and in contrast to most other ant-parasitic lycaenids, feeds on aphid honeydew instead of plants when young. They start to produce a sweet secretion from a specialized endocrine gland called the dorsal nectary organ (DNO) at the third instar stage. The ants, Camponotus japonicus, carry the larvae of this age to their nests and care for them over the winter months. The ants have a strong interest in the larval DNO secretions while feeding and grooming (see Figure 1A). They often tap on the back of the larva to stimulate secretion from the DNO (see Figure 1B). Once an ant has taken a drop of secretion, it holds it with its labial and maxillary palps (arrows in Figure 2A) and shares it with other nestmates. Thus, the DNO secretion is thought to be crucial in retaining the relationship between the butterfly larvae and the ants (Wardlaw et al., 2000Go). However, these behavioral observations have not been coupled with studies of the sensory physiology of the ants and how they perceive the taste of the secretion.



View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The ant, C. japonicus, and the larvae of the lycaenid butterfly, N. fusca. (A) An ant is feeding a larva of the lycaenid butterfly. (B) An ant tapping on the back of a larva to stimulate the DNO into producing a secretion.

 


View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Scanning electron microscope image of the taste sensilla of the ant. (A) Dorsal view of the head of a worker: mp, maxillary palps; lp, labial palps. The scale bar indicates 1 mm. (B) High magnification of a labial palp. The arrow indicates the taste sensillum used for electrophysiological experiments. Scale bar = 0.1 mm.

 

The secretions of N. fusca have only once analysed because of difficulty in capturing the larvae and in collecting the small amounts of secretion. The analysis of Nomura et al. (Nomura et al., 1992Go) showed that the secretion contains 160 mM glucose (75% of the total sugar) and 43 mM glycine (76% of the total amino acid). It has been reported that the larvae of other myrmecophilous butterflies, Jalmenus evagoras (Pierce, 1989Go; Pierce and Nash, 1999Go) and Lysandra hispana (Maschwitz et al., 1975Go) secrete serine and methionine instead of glycine, respectively (see Discussion). As for the sugar component, a separate study found that the secretion of N. fusca contained 600 mM glucose (45% of the total sugar) (D. Chogyoji, personal communication). This difference in concentration of glucose may be due to differences in the nutritional states of the colonies of host ants feeding the larvae of N. fusca.

Based on these data, we conducted behavioral and electro-physiological experiments on the taste of the DNO secretion of N. fusca, hypothesizing that the glucose—glycine combination in the DNO secretion could provide an especially alluring taste for workers of C. japonicus.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The ants

The ants, C. japonicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), were all collected from the same colony in the field. In our laboratory, they were kept in plastic boxes (350 x 225 x 55 mm) with only a supply of water. We subjected them to electrophysiological experiments 2 days after collection. Six days after collection, we used them for the behavior experiments, because the period of food deprivation increases the feeding sensitivity to be analysed. As the median of feeding threshold, K1/2, differed among groups of ants (see Figures 4A and 5A), data from a series of behavioral experiments were obtained in the same population.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Concentration—feeding response relationships for glucose and glycine. The percentages of ants showing feeding responses are plotted against the logarithmically scaled concentrations of glucose and glycine, respectively. The curve fittings correspond to with the equations y = 100x1.6/K1/21.6 + x1.6) and y = 100x1.2/(K1/21.2 + x1.2) on the concentration—response relationships for glucose and glycine, respectively. The error bars indicate standard deviations (n = 20).

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Effect of glycine on feeding responses to glucose. The percentage of the ants showing feeding response is plotted against concentration of glucose in the presence of (A) 0, (B) 50, (C) 100 and (D) 200 mM glycine. The curve fittings correspond to the equations, y = 100x1.8/(K1/21.8 + x1.8) for (A-C) and y = 100x1.6/(K1/21.6 + x1.6) for (D). The curve in (A) is indicated by broken lines in (B-D). The error bars indicate standard deviations (n = 20).

 

Behavioral tests

We conducted two types of behavior tests: (i) choice-and-drink tests to examine preference between two kinds of test solutions and (ii) feeding response tests to determine the feeding threshold of a test solution.

The choice-and-drink test was carried out according to the method of Tanimura et al. (Tanimura et al., 1982Go), which was originally designed for fruit flies. In order to determine the relative effects of glucose and glucose plus glycine, we used three test plates, each of which had 60 wells. In each plate, the 60 wells were alternately filled with 10 µl of glucose solution and glucose-plus-glycine solution. In plate 1, the glucose solution was stained with a blue food color (brilliant blue FCF) and the glucose-plus-glycine solution was colorless, so that the blue and the colorless wells made a checkered pattern. In plate 2, colorless glucose and blue glucose-plus-glycine solutions were used. In plate 3, both solutions were colorless. In preliminary experiments, we established that the blue food color used in our study affected neither electrophysiological nor feeding response to glucose. We placed four ants onto each of these three plates and let them drink freely for 3 h in the dark. The ants were then frozen and their crops were isolated. The crops were homogenized and extracted with 1 ml of 50 % ethanol. The absorbance of the extracts was measured at 630 nm with a spectrophotometer. In order to eliminate non-specific absorbance by the intrinsic crop extract, the absorbance of the stomach extract in the ants of plate 3 was subtracted from the absorbance of the crop extract of the ants of plates 1 and 2. Using the compensated absorbancies of the extracts of plates 1 (Abs.1) and 2 (Abs.2), the preference rates for glucose and glucose-plus-glycine solutions were defined as Abs.1/(Abs.1 + Abs.2) and Abs.2/(Abs.1 + Abs.2), respectively. If Abs.1/(Abs.1 + Abs.2) = Abs.2/(Abs.1 + Abs.2), the ants showed no difference between glucose and glucose plus glycine. If Abs.1/(Abs.1 + Abs.2) > Abs.2/(Abs.1 + Abs.2), the ants preferred glucose to glucose plus glycine. If Abs.1/(Abs.1 + Abs.2) < Abs.2/(Abs.1 + Abs.2), the ants preferred glucose plus glycine to glucose. Furthermore, we carried out similar experiments using methionine and serine instead of glycine, because the major amino acid in the DNO secretion is glycine in N. fusca, but serine has been reported to be the main amino-acid component of the DNO secretion in Jalmenus evagoras (Hunt et al., 1982Go) and methionine has been found in trace amounts in the DNO secretion of Lysandra hispana (Maschwitz et al., 1975Go).

For the feeding response tests, a glucose concentration series of the test solution was prepared (10 concentration steps using 1:2 dilutions with distilled water, starting from 2 M glucose) and three other glucose concentration series were prepared in the same way, but using 1:2 dilutions with 50, 100 or 200 mM glycine. Twenty ants were randomly chosen from a single colony and each was placed in a plastic pipette tip with the top cut to fit the head of the ant, so that the head of the ant stuck out of the opening. Thus restrained, the ants in the pipette tips were convenient to handle under the binocular microscope. A drop of test solution was placed under the microscope and carefully touched with the maxillary and the labial palps. Observing movements of the glossa, we quickly judged whether the ant was prepared to drink the test solution or not. We then counted the number of ants showing this feeding response with glossa extension. In drawing a concentration—feeding response curve based on this kind of experiment, the number of ants showing glossa extension was plotted against the logarithmically scaled concentration of glucose and curve fitting was done by computer.

Electrophysiological procedure

The isolated head of the ant was connected to an indifferent platinum electrode. A glass capillary containing the stimulus solution also contained the platinum wire of the recording electrode. Under the microscope, the long chemosensillum on the second segment of the labial palps (arrow in Figure 2B) was focused and the capillary was slipped over the tip of the sensillum. Thus, the sensory response was simultaneously recorded when the stimulus touched the sensillum tip (Hodgson et al., 1955Go). The stimulus solutions were prepared with various concentrations of glucose and/or glycine dissolved in 100 mM NaCl. The 100 mM NaCl solution alone did not induce significant responses (see Figure 6B). The duration of stimulation was 0.7-1 s and intervals of at least 3 min between stimuli were taken to avoid any effects of adaptation. We used only workers with responsive sensilla for these assays; a sensillum was considered to be responsive if it generated >9 impulses/0.5 s to glucose in 100 mM NaCl.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Impulse recordings of the responses in the sensillum on the labial palps. The impulses elicited by: (A) 500, (B) 100 and (C) 10 mM NaCl; (D) 400 mM glucose; and (E-G) 1 M glycine dissolved in 100 mM NaCl are seen. The impulses of the water receptor cell are indicated by dots.

 

Scanning electron microscope

The isolated heads of the ants were mildly sonicated in distilled water, dehydrated through the ethanol series of 70, 80, 85, 90, 95, 99 and 100% and finally treated with 100% acetone. They were then transferred into iso-amyl acetate. After they had been dried in the critical-point dryer, each specimen was put on a sample stage, coated with gold and observed with a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-2100A).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effects of glycine on glucose-feeding behavior

In the choice-and-drink experiment (Figure 3), we tested 400 mM glucose versus 400 mM glucose plus 50 (A), 100 (B), or 200 mM glycine (C). This concentration of glucose was the average value of measurements by Nomura et al. (Nomura et al., 1992Go) and D. Chogyoji (personal communication). The results showed that the preference for glucose alone decreased from 0.35 ± 0.04 (n = 4) to 0.09 ± 0.07 (n = 4), whereas the preference for glucose plus glycine increased from 0.65 ± 0.04 (n = 4) to 0.91 ± 0.07 (n = 4), as the concentration of glycine was increased from 50 to 200 mM. When we used 200 mM fructose instead of 400 mM glucose, taste enhancement was also observed in the presence of 100 mM glycine. We also examined the effects of 100 mM serine (E) and 100 mM methionine (F) on feeding preference for glucose in C. japonicus. However, serine and methionine did not affect the preference for glucose in C. japonicus. As shown in Figure 4, 400 mM glucose induced feeding in several sets of 20 ants, but <500 mM glycine did not induce feeding in any ants from the same colony.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Feeding preference for glucose in the absence or presence of glycine. The preference for 400 mM glucose plus (A) 50, (B) 100, or (C) 200 mM glycine is compared with that of 400 mM glucose alone in a sample of ants. The preference for 200 mM fructose plus 100 mM glycine (D) is compared with that for 200 mM fructose alone. The preference for 400 mM glucose plus (D) 100 mM glycine, (E) serine, or (F) methionine is compared with that for 400 mM glucose. The error bars indicate the standard deviations (n = 4).

 

In Figure 5, the percentage of ants showing a feeding response is plotted against the concentration of glucose in the presence of 0 (A), 50 (B), 100 (C) or 200 mM glycine (D). The concentrations of glucose at which 50 % of the ants showed the feeding response, K1/2, were 490, 320, 220 and 100 mM in the presence of 0, 50, 100 and 200 mM glycine, respectively. Statistically, the distribution of the feeding threshold is regarded as a logarithmic normal distribution, so that the value of K1/2 corresponds to the median of the feeding threshold in a test population (Hirakawa and Kijima, 1978Go). Thus, glycine, even at concentrations that are ineffective in eliciting feeding in the absence of glucose, significantly decreases the feeding threshold of the ants to glucose, resulting in an increase of their preference rate for glucose plus glycine, as shown in Figure 3.

Effects of glycine on the sugar taste response of the chemosensillum

The electron micrograph of Figure 2A shows the dorsal view of the head of C. japonicus. Pairs of maxillary and the labial palps are seen (arrows in A). At high magnification (B), an arrow indicates a long type of sensillum located on the second segment of the labial palps. From this type of sensillum, we recorded sensory responses. The ants use the palps to share droplets of the DNO secretion.

In preliminary observations by scanning electron microscopy, we found several types of chemosensilla in the mouth-parts. Among them, an elongate taste sensillum on the second segment of the labial palps was the most reliable in retaining normal function under laboratory conditions. Therefore, we investigated the effects of glycine on the electrophysiological response of this sensillum.

First, we recorded sensory responses from this sensillum to 500, 100 and 10 mM NaCl (Figure 6). Stimulation with 500 mM NaCl induced impulses of large amplitude (A), but stimulation with 100 (B) or 10 mM NaCl (C) did not. These impulses were derived from a salt receptor cell. Stimulation with 100 or 10 mM NaCl induced impulses of small amplitude, which were derived from a water receptor cell (dots). As is characteristic of impulses from water receptor cells, the frequency decreased as the concentration of NaCl increased.

Since 100 mM NaCl only induced a small number of impulses from the water receptor cell, we used 100 mM NaCl to dissolve sugars and/or glycine for stimulus solutions. When the sensillum was stimulated with 400 mM glucose dissolved in 100 mM NaCl (D), a few impulses from the water receptor cell (dots) were also seen, but all other impulses differed in amplitude from impulses typically observed in either water or salt receptor cells. We concluded that these impulses of middle amplitude were derived from the sugar receptor cell. The absolute amplitudes of impulses of the salt (to 500 mM NaCl), the water (to 100 mM NaCl) and the sugar receptor cells (to 400 mM glucose in 100 mM NaCl) are listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Amplitudes of impulses
 

One mole of glycine dissolved in 100 mM NaCl induced, in <20 % of the trials, a small number of impulses from the sugar receptor cell (E, F). In most cases, however, glycine induced no impulses (G) or occasionally a small number of impulses of the water receptor cell (data not shown). In Figure 6, the impulses in A-C were recorded in the sensillum of one ant and those in D-G in different sensilla of another ant.

As shown in Figure 6, 1 M glycine typically did not induce electrophysiological responses from the sugar receptor cell (G), but, rarely, such responses were observed (E, F). Therefore, the sugar receptor cells in the sensilla on the labial palps may have responsiveness to glycine, but this response may be masked because the threshold for glycine is higher than that for glucose. Even if the ants have other types of taste organs sensitive to glycine than the sensilla examined here, their threshold for glycine would still be higher than that for glucose, because Figure 4B shows that only 15% of ants tested responded to 1 M glycine.

In order to investigate the concentration-dependent effect of glycine on the taste reception of glucose, sensory responses were recorded to 100 mM NaCl solutions of 400 mM glucose plus 0 (A), 50 (B), 100 (C) and 200 mM glycine (D), respectively (Figure 7). We observed that the impulses of the sugar receptor cell increased as the concentration of glycine increased, although the tested concentrations of glycine on its own did not excite the sugar receptor cell. We counted the number of impulses generated for 0.5 s (between black arrows in Figure 7) starting from 0.1 s after the beginning of stimulation. The same experiment was repeated in the same type of sensillum in four different animals, as shown in the diagram of Figure 8. The magnitudes of response to 400 mM glucose plus 100 or 200 mM glycine are significantly different from those to 400 mM glucose alone (Student's t-test, P < 0.05).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7 Impulse recordings of the response to glucose in the presence of glycine. The impulses elicited by 400 mM glucose in the presence of (A) 0, (B) 50, (C) 100 and (D) 200 mM glycine are seen. The white arrow indicates the beginning of stimulation. The black arrows at 0.1 and 0.6 s mark the interval for which the number of impulses was counted for Figures 8 and 9.

 


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8 Effects of glycine on the taste response to glucose. The impulses of the sugar receptor cell generated for 0.5 s starting from 0.1 to 0.6 s after beginning of stimulation with 400 mM glucose plus 0, 50, 100 or 200 mM glycine are compared with each other. The error bars indicate standard deviations (n = 4).

 



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9 Effect of glycine on the concentration-response relationships for glucose. The numbers of impulses of the sugar receptor cell generated for 0.5 s starting from 0.1 to 0.6 s after beginning of stimulation were normalized to that of 1 M glucose in the absence of glycine and plotted against concentration of glucose in the absence (open circles) and presence (closed circles) of 200 mM glycine. The error bars indicate standard deviations (n = 3). Asterisks indicate significant differences between the presence and absence of 200 mM glycine (Student's t-test, P < 0.05).

 

Figure 9A shows the glucose concentration-response curves in the absence and presence of 200 mM glycine. The relative magnitudes of response normalized to the response to 1 M glucose in the absence of glycine are plotted. We could not confirm whether the maximum response to glucose was changed by glycine or not, because the responses to concentrations of glucose >1 M were reduced in their amplitudes for unknown reasons and were, therefore, difficult to count. After stimulation with high concentrations of glucose, the responsiveness of the sensilla tended to be unstable, so that 32 sensilla examinations resulted in only three complete pairs of concentration-response curves comparable in the same sensilla. However, in the presence of 200 mM glycine (closed circles), the concentration-response curve appeared to shift to the left of the control curve in the absence of glycine (open circles). Since 200 mM glycine itself did not induce any impulses of the sugar receptor cell, it would appear that glycine has a synergistic rather than an additive effect on the response to glucose.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Role of amino acid in DNO secretion

Myrmecophilous lycaenid butterflies have a wide range of life cycles. Some species, such as Jalmenus evagoras from Australia, feed on foliage throughout their larval stages. The larvae and pupae offer attendant ants nutritious secretions and, in return, the ants protect them against parasites and predators (Pierce, 1984Go, 1987Go; Pierce and Nash, 1999Go). Other species, such as Maculinea arion, begin feeding on flowers, but after the third instar, drop to the ground where they are picked up by ants and are carried into the nest. They feed on the ant brood until pupation (Hölldobler and Wilson, 1994Go). Niphanda fusca, a Japanese myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly, is likewise a parasite of the attendant ants, inducing their host ants, C. japonicus, to feed them mouth-to-mouth by trophallaxis inside the nest. The larvae of N. fusca are completely dependent upon their host ants for food. Nevertheless, why should they simultaneously reward ants with secretions from the DNO?

Although the DNO secretion may include other substances than sugars and amino acids, studies on larval attractiveness to ants have focused on amino acids, because the larvae of lycaenid species that feed on nitrogen-fixing plants are much more likely to associate with ants than other lycaenid species that feed on non-nitrogen-fixing plants (Pierce, 1985Go; Fiedler, 1995Go, 1996Go). The DNO secretions of some myrmecophilous lycaenid butterflies include particularly concentrated amino acids; their content is often an order of magnitude more than that found in most extrafloral nectaries or in honeydew of aphids (Pierce and Young, 1986Go; Pierce, 1987Go; Fiedler and Maschwitz, 1989Go; DeVries, 1991Go; Fiedler and Saam, 1995Go). The concentrated amino acids in the DNO secretions have been considered to be an important nitrogen source for the attendant ants. Camponotus japonicus cannot detect concentrations of glycine <500 mM (Figures 4 and 6), but ants attracted by the DNO secretion can take up glycine, which could be a metabolically inexpensive nitrogen source for them. Some social insects are known to use their larvae as a kind of collective stomach. The adult workers feed complex proteins to the brood. The brood digest these proteins and then regurgitate solutions rich in free amino acids back to the workers (Hunt et al., 1982Go). The workers can then use these amino acids as precursors for the many chemicals used in communication and/or metabolic processes. It is possible that the larvae of N. fusca use the secretions from the DNO as a means of mimicking the ant brood.

Camponotus japonicus did not respond to glycine, serine or methionine at the concentrations in the DNO secretion reported for N. fusca (Nomura et al., 1992Go) (Figure 4), Jalmenus evagoras (Hunt et al., 1982Go; Pierce, 1989Go) or Lysandra hispana (Maschwitz et al., 1975Go). However, C. japonicus obviously prefer `glycine-flavored glucose', which mimics the sugar-amino acid mixture in the DNO secretion of N. fusca, to plain glucose (Figure 3A-C). Lysandra hispana is a facultative and unspecific myrmecophile, whose ant visitors cover a range of ant taxa (Fiedler, 1990Go). This contrasts sharply with the situation found in Jalmenus evagoras, where the caterpillars do have a specific relationship with only a small number of Iridomyrmex species and records of associations with other ant species are from highly exceptional situations (Eastwood and Fraser, 1999Go). Therefore, while in the specific myrmecophile Jalmenus evagoras one might expect adaptation of secretions to the taste of the specific host ant, such a specialization would be extremely unlikely in the opportunistic myrmecophile Lysandra hispana. On the other hand, different species of ants are known to be able to detect and prefer some amino acids to others (Lanza, 1991Go; Lanza et al., 1993Go). The species of ants tending both Jalmenus evagoras and Lysandra hispana do not, however, include C. japonicus and thus would be expected to differ in their gustatory responses. Although we found that the Japanese species of ants Formica japonica and C. obscripes, which are not the attendant ants of N. fusca, would not prefer the `glycine-flavored glucose' to glucose alone, further comparisons between C. japonicus, the attendant ant of N. fusca, and the attendant ants of Jalmenus evagoras or Lysandra hispana should clarify the question of whether different kinds of amino acid increase feeding preference in different species of ant.

Sweet-taste enhancement by amino acid in the ant

In mammals, synergistic taste-enhancing effects of `umami' substances are well known. This is dramatically observed in synergistic interactions between amino acids and nucleotides, whose tastes are classified into the fifth fundamental taste, `umami' (Yamaguchi, 1967Go, 1991Go). `Umami' substances result in increase in the palatability of foods and an improvement of appetite in humans; similarly the taste-enhancing effects of glycine on the sweetness of glucose result in an improvement of appetite in the ant, C. japonicus (Figure 3).

Taste organs of insects have a unit structure containing a mechanoreceptor and four taste receptor cells that differ in their functions. The salt and the water receptor cells would not trigger feeding responses, as long as insects appropriately maintain intrinsic salt and water balance. The so-called `fifth cell' or `fourth taste receptor cell', for which adequate stimuli are not conclusively determined, appears to respond to alkali halides such as CsCl (Gillary, 1966Go), bitter substances such as quinine (Liscia and Solari, 2000Go) and lipophilic substances such as limonene (M. Ozaki, unpublished data). These stimuli do not induce feeding responses, but rather inhibit them and sometimes evoke aversion behavior in the blowfly (Dethier, 1976Go; Liscia and Solari, 2000Go; Nakamura, et al., 2000Go). Thus, even if the ants have this type of `fifth cell', it is unlikely to be involved in glucose taste enhancement by glycine. The taste receptor cell, excitation of which induces feeding response to sugars and other nutritious substances such as amino acids, is traditionally called the sugar receptor cell in insects. Because neither glucose (Figure 6D) nor glycine at high concentration (E, F) induced feeding response and evoked impulses of the sugar receptor cell, it is suggested that the taste-enhancement mechanism by glycine in C. japonicus is exclusively controlled by the sugar receptor cell.

In insects, the responsiveness of the sugar receptor cells to amino acids depends upon the species and their feeding style. The tsetse fly, for example, can respond to various amino acids (Van der Goes van Naters and Den Otter, 1998Go), but the fleshfly responds to some (Shimada, 1975Go; Shimada and Isono, 1978Go). The blowfly responds to various sugars, but few amino acids (Goldrich, 1973Go). Camponotus japonicus may be more like the blowfly than the tsetse fly or the fleshfly in the low responsiveness of its sugar receptor cell to glycine (Figure 6E-G) and other amino acids (data not shown). For enhancing the taste of glucose, however, glycine need not act as a gustatory stimulus by itself, because even at lower concentrations than the electrophysiological threshold, glycine enhanced the taste of glucose (Figures 7 and 8). In other words, the glycine receptor molecule would not mediate this taste enhancement.

The concentration-response curve shift observed in the presence of glycine (Figure 9) might be explained by an increase in stimulus affinity, the available number of receptor molecules or the efficacy of some steps of the intracellular transduction processes. As we have shown in the present study, however, 200 mM glycine enhanced taste responses in C. japonicus, not only to glucose but also to fructose (Figure 3). Considering the multiple-site hypothesis, exemplified by the coexistence of different receptor molecules for glucose and fructose on the sugar receptor cell in the fleshfly (Shimada et al., 1974Go) or the blowfly (Hara, 1983Go), taste enhancement by glycine in C. japonicus is presumed not to be a receptor-molecule-specific event. In order to clarify the precise mechanism of this taste enhancement, however, the target of glycine should be determined at the molecular level after characterization of receptor molecules and transduction mechanisms in the sugar receptor cell of the ants.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Mr H. Shimizu and Mr D. Chogyoji for helpful discussions and Professor T. Amakawa for kind permission to use his electrophysiological equipment. We also thank Professor N.E. Pierce for her critical reading of the paper and for helpful advice. This work was supported by a grant of Human Frontier Science Program to M.O.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Atsatt, P.R. (1981) Ant dependent oviposition by the mistletoe butterfly Ogyris amaryllis.Oecologia , 48,60 -63.

Dethier, V.G. (1976) The Hungry Fly. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

DeVries, P.J. (1991) Evolutionary and ecological patterns in myrmecophilous riodinid butterflies. In Huxley, C.R. and Cutler, D.F. (eds) Ant-Plant Interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 143-156.

Eastwood, R. and Fraser, A.M. (1999) Associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants in Australia.Austr. J. Ecol. , 24,503 -537.

Fiedler, K. (1990) European and north west African lycaenidae (Lepidoptera) and their associations with ants.J. Res. Lepid. , 28,239 -257.

Fiedler, K. (1995) Lycaenid butterflies and plants: is myrmecophily associated with particular hostplant preferences?Ethol. Ecol. Evol. , 7,107 -132.

Fiedler, K. (1996) Host-plant relationships of lycaenid butterflies: large-scale patterns, interactions with plant chemistry, and mutualism with ants. Ent. Exp. Appl.,80 , 259-267.

Fiedler, K. and Maschwitz, U. (1989) Functional analysis of the myrmecophilous relationships between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). 1. Release of food recruitment in ants by lycaenid larvae and pupae.Ethology , 80,71 -80.

Fiedler, K. and Saam, C. (1995) Ants benefit from attending facultatively myrmecophilous Lycaenidae caterpillars—evidence from a survival study.Oecologia , 104,316 -322.

Fiedler, K., Hölldobler, B. and Seufert, P. (1996) Butterflies and ants—the communicative domain. Experientia,52 , 14-24.

Gillary, H.L. (1966) Stimulation of the salt receptor of the blowfly. III. The alkali halides. J. Gen. Physiol., 50,359 -368.

Goldrich, N.R. (1973) Behavioral responses of Phormia regina (Meigen) to labellar stimulation with amino acids. J. Gen. Physiol., 61,74 -88.

Hara, M. (1983) Competition of polysaccharides with sugar for the pyranose and the furanose sites in the labellar sugar receptor cell of the blowfly, Phormia regina. J. Insect Physiol., 29,113 -118.

Henning, S.F. (1983) Biological groups within the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). J. Entomol. Soc. Southern Africa, 46,65 -85.

Hirakawa, Y. and Kijima, H. (1978) Behavioral analysis of glutathione receptor of Hydra. J. Comp. Physiol., 137,73 -81.

Hodgson, E.S., Lettvin, J.Y. and Roeder, K.D. (1955) Physiology of primary chemoreceptor unit.Science , 122,417 -418.

Hölldobler, B. and Wilson, E.O. (1990) The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Hölldobler, B. and Wilson, E.O. (1994) Journey to the Ants. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.

Hunt, J.H., Baker, I. and Baker, H.G. (1982) Similarity of amino acids in nectar and larval saliva: the nutritional bases for trophallaxis in social wasps.Evolution , 36,1318 -1322.

Lanza, J. (1991) Response of fire ants (Formicidae, Solenopsis invicta and S. geminata) to artificial nectars with amino acids. Ecol. Entomol.,16 , 203-210.

Lanza, J., Vargo, E.L., Pulim, S. and Chang, Y.Z. (1993) Preferences of the fire ants Solenopsis invicta and S. geminata (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) for amino-acid and sugar components of extrafloral nectars. Environ. Entomol., 22,411 -417.

Liscia, A. and Solari, P. (2000) Bitter taste recognition in the blowfly: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Physiol. Behav.,70 , 61-65.

Maschwitz, V., Wust, M. and Schrian, I. (1975) Blaulingsraupen als Zuckerlieferauten für Ameisen. Oecologia,18 , 17-21.

Nagayama, F. (1950) Life cycle of Niphanda fusca. Ecol. Entomol., 3,9 -18.

Nakamura, K., Kakiuchi, M., Kawahara, Y., Ozaki, M. and Yamaoka, R. (2000) Associative memories between taste of sucrose and limonene or coumarin odors in the blowfly, Phormia regina.Jpn. J. Taste Smell Res. , 7,389 -390.

Nomura, K., Hirukawa, N., Yamaoka, R. and Imafuku, M. (1992) Problems on the symbiosis between the lycaenid butterfly larva, Niphanda fusca Shijimia and the ant Camponotus japonicus (1). J. Lepidopterol. Soc. Jpn,43 , 138-143.

Pierce, N.E. (1984) Amplified species diversity: a case study of an Australian lycaenid butterfly and its attendant ants. In Vane-Write, R.I. and Ackery, P.R. (eds), The Biology of Butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp.197 -200.

Pierce, N.E. (1985) Lycaenid butterflies and ants: selection for nitrogen-fixing and other protein-rich food plants. Am. Nat., 125,888 -895.

Pierce, N.E. (1987) The evolution and biogeography of associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants. In Harvey, P.H. and Partridge, L. (eds), Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 4. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 89-116.

Pierce, N.E. (1989) Butterfly-ant mutualism. In Grubb, P.J. and Whittaker, J. (eds), Towards a More Exact Ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp.299 -324.

Pierce, N.E. and Nash, D.R. (1999) The Imperial Blue, Jalmenus evagoras (Lycaenidae). In Kitching, R.I., Sheermeyer, E., Jones, R. and Pierce, N.E. (eds),Monographs on Australian Lepidoptera, Vol. 6. The Biology of Australian Butterflies . CSIRO Press, Sydney, pp.277 -316.

Pierce, N.E. and Young, W.R. (1986) Lycaenid butterflies and ants: two species stable equilibria in mutualistic, commensal, and parasitic interactions. Am. Nat., 128,216 -227.

Shimada, I. (1975) Two receptor sites and their relation to amino acid stimulation in the labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly. J. Insect Physiol., 21,1675 -1680.

Shimada, I. and Isono, K. (1978) The specific receptor site for aliphatic carboxylate anion in the labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly. J. Insect Physiol.,24 , 807-811.

Shimada, I., Shiraishi, A., Kijima, H. and Morita, H. (1974) Separation of two receptor sites in a single labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly by treatment with p-chlormercuribenzoate. J. Insect Physiol.,20 , 605-621.

Tanimura, T., Isono, K., Takamura, K. and Shimada, I. (1982) Genetic dimorphism in the taste sensitivity to trehalose in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol.,147 , 433-437.

Thomas, J.A., Elmes, G.W., Wardlaw, J.C. and Woyciechowski, M. (1989) Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests.Oecologia , 79,452 -457.

Van der Goes van Naters, W.M. and Den Otter, C.J. (1998) Amino acids as taste stimuli for tsetse flies.Physiol. Entomol. , 23,278 -284.

Wardlaw, J.C., Thomas, J.A. and Elmes, G.W. (2000) Do Maculinea rebeli caterpillars provide vestigial mutualistic benefits to ants when living as social parasites in Myrmica ant nests? Ent. Exp. Appl.,95 , 97-103.

Yamaguchi, S. (1967) The synergistic taste effect of monosodium glutamate and disodium 5' inosinate. J. Food Sci., 32,473 -478.

Yamaguchi, S. (1991) Basic properties of umami and effects on humans. Physiol. Behav.,49 , 833-841.

Accepted June 13, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wada, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ozaki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wada, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ozaki, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?