Skip Navigation

Chemical Senses 2005 30(Supplement 1):i273-i274; doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh220
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marcillac, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ferveur, J.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marcillac, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ferveur, J.-F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Chemical Senses Vol. 30 No. suppl 1 © Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved

Revisited Roles of Drosophila Female Pheromones

Fabrice Marcillac, Benjamin Houot and Jean-François Ferveur

Unité de Recherche 5548 Associée au Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Bourgogne, 6, Bd Gabriel, 21 000 Dijon, France

Correspondence to be sent to: Jean-François Ferveur, e-mail: jean-francois.ferveur{at}u-bourgogne.fr

Key words: co-adaptation, 7, 11-dienes, Drosophila, mate preference, sex pheromones, sexual isolation


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 Results
 Conclusion
 References
 
Chemical signals, or sex pheromones, are often required for the rapprochement of sex partners and to elicit or prevent courtship and reproduction (Wyatt, 2003Go). In many invertebrate species, sex pheromones are a part of complex mixtures because they are often associated with (or made of) multiple components inducing different effects (Cardé and Minks, 1997Go). The precise pheromonal influence of the various components of a complex bouquet is difficult to determine in live animals because the experimental methods involved in isolating and testing are invasive and do not parallel the ‘in vivo’ situation. Drosophila melanogaster is a favorable species to study pheromonal communication because the comparison of live transgenic flies producing various blends allows the evaluation of the ‘in vivo’ role of the pheromonal components that vary. Another non-invasive method allows for the ‘perfuming’ of flies by passive transfer of pheromones between flies of different genotypes (Coyne et al., 1994Go).

In D. melanogaster females of most strains (such as Canton-S = Cs), two cuticular hydrocarbons (CHs) are quantitatively predominant [7,11-heptacosadiene (7,11-HD = 400 ng) and 7,11-nonacosadiene (7,11-ND = 200 ng)] (Antony and Jallon, 1982Go; Antony et al., 1985Go). However, females of the variant strains collected in Caribbean and sub-Saharan areas produce much less 7,11-dienes (<100 ng; Ferveur et al., 1996Go). The genetic and molecular bases of this variation, together with its possible evolutionary and adaptative implications, were recently revealed (Coyne et al., 1999Go; Takahashi et al., 2001Go; Fang et al., 2002Go; Greenberg et al., 2003Go). These substances may play a role in sexual isolation because they are present in D. melanogaster and D. sechellia females, but not in females of the two closely related species D. simulans and D. mauritiana (Jallon and David, 1987Go).

Two studies carried out with the two transgenic female genotypes, hsp70 x UAS-transformer (hs-tra) and desat1, which respectively produce no or low amounts of 7,11-dienes (Savarit et al., 1999Go; Marcillac et al., 2004Go) revealed the multiple roles that these pheromones play in inter- and intraspecific male courtship and mating.


    Results
 Top
 Introduction
 Results
 Conclusion
 References
 
7,11-Dienes strongly prevent interspecific male courtship and mating

Flies with relatively high levels of 7,11-dienes induce no or very low courtship in D. simulans males, indicating that these substances are involved in reproductive isolation (Coyne et al., 1994Go; Coyne and Oyama, 1995Go). The strong inhibitory role of D. melanogaster female pheromones to D. simulans and D. mauritiana males, but not to D. sechellia males, was clearly shown with hs-tra females that were, or were not, perfumed with dienes (Savarit et al., 1999Go).

To measure the threshold of inhibition, mutant desat1 D. melanogaster females that were, or were not, perfumed with female pheromones of the control Cs strain were tested with males of three species (Table 1). The difference between non-perfumed and perfumed females [with, respectively, 46 ± 5 ng (n = 26) and 108 ± 12 ng (n = 34) of 7,11-dienes] was apparently detected by D. mauritiana males that courted and mated more often with non-perfumed than with perfumed desat1 females. Both frequencies of male courtship and mating were apparently lower than those induced by totally deprived females (hs-tra; Savarit et al., 1999Go) suggesting that D. mauritiana males are dose-dependently inhibited by quantities of 7,11-dienes ranging between 0 and 100 ng. Conversely, D. simulans males could be more sensitive to these substances because they were completely inhibited by non-perfumed females.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Courtship and mating of various females with males of three species
 
7,11-Dienes are not required to induce intraspecific male courtship and mating behaviors

Early experiments performed with natural fractions of CHs extracts tested on dead dummies suggested that 100 ng of 7,11-HD and 400 ng of 7,11-ND can induce the maximum excitation in Cs males (Antony et al., 1985Go). A study with living sex mosaic flies producing variable mixtures of female and male predominant CHs, suggested that <30 ng 7,11-dienes can elicit the maximal male courtship intensity (Ferveur and Sureau, 1996Go).

The hypothesis that 7,11-dienes are not required to induce strong male courtship was clear when intact hs-tra females (totally deprived of 7,11-dienes) and Cs females induced a similarly strong excitation in Cs males (Savarit et al., 1999Go). However, male flies mated less often (–25%) with intact hs-tra females and directed a weaker courtship (–30%) to decapitated hs-tra females if compared to control females. This suggests that the multiple sensory signals emitted by intact females could make up for the absence of 7,11-dienes; nevertheless, these substances seem to increase male propensity to mate.

7,11-Dienes enhance mate choice between homotypic partners, without any dose-dependent effect

To clearly assess the role on mating of female pheromones, live desat1 females were or were not perfumed (by crowding with Cs donor females) with 7,11-dienes. In both choice and non-choice experiments (carried out, respectively, with two or one desat1 females and one Cs male), perfumed females mated more often than non-perfumed desat1 females. Moreover, Cs males, but not Tai males, mated faster with perfumed than with non-perfumed females (Marcillac and Ferveur, 2004Go).

To measure for dose-dependent effect of 7,11-dienes, the ratio between donor Cs and receiver desat1 females was changed. Choice tests involving a Cs male with both a non-perfumed female and a perfumed female (carrying between 90 and 570 ng of 7,11-dienes) showed no dose effect for female preference and mating speed.

The presence of 7,11-dienes is correlated with increased copulation duration and decreased sex-ratio of the progeny

The transfer of Cs female’s pheromones on mutant desat1 females increased their copulation duration with Cs and Tai males. Furthermore, the presence of 7,11-dienes and longer copulation duration were both associated with a decreased production of female offspring in mating tests with Cs males. Perfumed females significantly produced fewer daughters, but a similar number of sons, than non-perfumed females. Therefore, the sex ratio in the progeny of perfumed females was biased towards an excess of sons whereas that of non-perfumed females was close to one. Moreover, individual females with the higher proportion of daughters showed the shorter copulation durations (Marcillac and Ferveur, 2004Go). These findings suggest that female pheromones cause reciprocal effects on the genes contributed by females and males that may have a consequence in sexual conflict (Rice, 1996Go).


    Conclusion
 Top
 Introduction
 Results
 Conclusion
 References
 
The predominant cuticular hydrocarbons (CHs) of D. melanogaster female (likely 7,11-dienes) play a much more complex pheromonal role than hitherto suspected. According to their quantity, these substances play a dual role on male inter- and intraspecific mating behavior. Less than 100 ng can efficiently prevent male interspecific mating and strongly reinforce sexual isolation. More than 100 ng of 7,11-dienes are sufficient to regulate several aspects of intraspecific mating, with strain differences. If these female pheromones did not increase the overall intensity of male courtship, they enhanced both mating speed and frequency, at least in homotypic situation. The fact that a large majority of males prefered to mate first with a perfumed female can explain the selection of the factor(s) coding for these pheromones. Females of many strains produce amounts of dienes that largely exceed the threshold required for mate preference and it is not yet clear whether increasing doses of female pheromones can proportionally increase copulation duration and decrease the number of daughter in the progeny. The high level of female pheromones could also reflect the fisherian selection process of this secondary sexual character (Fisher, 1930Go), or serve as a yet unknown signal during inter-individual communication both at strain and at species levels. Finally, the significant role played by 7,11-dienes on various sequences of reproduction that occur before, during and after mating suggest that these pheromones help to finely adjust the co-adaptation mechanisms between the sexes.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 Results
 Conclusion
 References
 
Antony, C. and Jallon, J.M. (1982) The chemical basis for sex recognition in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol., 28, 873–880.[CrossRef]

Antony, C., Davis, T.L., Carlson, D.A., Pechiné, J.M. and Jallon, J.M. (1985) Compared behavioral responses of male Drosophila melanogaster (Canton-S) to natural and synthetic aphrodisiacs. J. Chem. Ecol., 11, 1617–1629.[CrossRef][ISI]

Cardé, R.T. and Minks, A.K. (eds) (1997) Insect Pheromone Research: New Directions. Chapman & Hall, New York.

Coyne, J.A. and Oyama, R. (1995) Localization of pheromonal sexual dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster and its effect on sexual isolation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 9505–9509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Coyne, J.A., Crittenden, A.P. and Mah, K. (1994) Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science, 265, 1461–1464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Coyne, J.A., Wicker-Thomas, C. and Jallon, J.M. (1999) A gene responsible for a cuticular hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res., 73, 189–203.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fang, S., Takahashi, A. and Wu, C.I. (2002) A mutation in the promoter of desaturase 2 is correlated with sexual isolation between Drosophila behavioral races. Genetics, 162, 781–784.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ferveur, J.F. and Sureau, G. (1996) Simultaneous influence on male courtship of stimulatory and inhibitory pheromones produced by live sex-mosaic Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 263, 967–973.[Medline]

Ferveur, J.F., Cobb, M., Boukella, H. and Jallon, J.M. (1996) World-wide variation in Drosophila melanogaster sex pheromone: behavioural effects, genetic bases and potential evolutionary consequences. Genetica, 97, 73–80.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fisher, R.A. (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Greenberg, A.J., Moran, J.R., Coyne, J.A. and Wu, C.I. (2003) Ecological adaptation during incipient speciation revealed by precise gene replacement. Science, 302, 1754–1757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jallon, J.M. and David, J.R. (1987) Variations in cuticular hydrocarbons along the eight species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Evolution, 41, 487–502.

Marcillac, F. and Ferveur, J.F. (2004) A set of female pheromones affects reproduction before, during and after mating in Drosophila. J. Exp. Biol., 207, 3927–3933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marcillac, F., Grosjean, Y. and Ferveur, J.F. (2004) The production and the discrimination of Drosophila sex pheromones are affected by a single mutation in the same gene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (in press).

Rice, W.R. (1996) Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature, 381, 232–234.[CrossRef][Medline]

Savarit, F., Sureau, G., Cobb, M. and Ferveur, J.F. (1999) Genetic elimination of known pheromones reveals the fundamental chemical bases of mating and isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 9015–9020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takahashi, A., Tsaur, S.C., Coyne, J.A. and Wu, C.I. (2001) The nucleotide changes governing cuticular hydrocarbon variation and their evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 3920–3925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wyatt, T.D. (ed.) (2003) Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marcillac, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ferveur, J.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marcillac, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ferveur, J.-F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?